Literature DB >> 28678672

Acute versus Chronic Myocardial Infarction: Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Native T1 and T2 Mapping versus Assessment of Edema on Standard T2-weighted Cardiovascular MR Images for Differentiation.

Enver Tahir1, Martin Sinn1, Sebastian Bohnen1, Maxim Avanesov1, Dennis Säring1, Christian Stehning1, Bernhard Schnackenburg1, Christine Eulenburg1, Joshua Wien1, Ulf K Radunski1, Stefan Blankenberg1, Gerhard Adam1, Charles B Higgins1, Maythem Saeed1, Kai Muellerleile1, Gunnar K Lund1.   

Abstract

Purpose To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of native T1 and T2 mapping compared with visual and quantitative assessment of edema on T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images to differentiate between acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Materials and Methods This study had institutional ethics committee approval. Written informed consent was obtained from 67 consecutive patients (57 years ± 12; 78% men) with a first acute myocardial infarction, who were prospectively enrolled between April 2011 and June 2015. Four serial 1.5-T MR imaging examinations were performed at 8 days ± 5, 7 weeks ± 2, 3 months ± 0.5, and 6 months ± 1.4 after infarction and included T2-weighted, native T1/T2 mapping, and late gadolinium enhancement MR imaging. Complete follow-up data were obtained in 42 patients. Regional native T1/T2 relaxation time, T2-weighted ratio, and extracellular volume were serially measured in infarcted and remote myocardium. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the MR imaging parameters for discriminating between acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Results Native T1 of infarcted myocardium decreased from 1286 msec ± 99 at baseline to 1077 msec ± 50 at 6 months (P < .0001), whereas T2 decreased from 84 msec ± 10 to 58 msec ± 4 (P < .0001). The T2-weighted ratio decreased from 4.1 ± 1.0 to 2.4 ± 0.6 (P < .0001). Of all the MR imaging parameters obtained, native T1 and T2 yielded the best areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of 0.975 and 0.979, respectively, for differentiating between acute and chronic myocardial infarction. Visual analysis of the presence of edema at standard T2-weighted cardiac MR imaging resulted in an inferior AUC of 0.863 (P < .01). Conclusion Native T1 and T2 of infarcted myocardium are excellent discriminators between acute and chronic myocardial infarction and are superior to all other MR imaging parameters. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28678672     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  CMR-derived extracellular volume fraction (ECV) in asymptomatic heart transplant recipients: correlations with clinical features and myocardial edema.

Authors:  Yating Yuan; Jie Cai; Yue Cui; Jing Wang; Osamah Alwalid; Xuehua Shen; Yukun Cao; Yan Zou; Bo Liang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  T1 and T2 mapping in the identification of acute myocardial injury in patients with NSTEMI.

Authors:  Carlo Tessa; Jacopo Del Meglio; Alessio Lilli; Stefano Diciotti; Luca Salvatori; Marco Giannelli; Andreas Greiser; Claudio Vignali; Giancarlo Casolo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Clinical application and technical considerations of T1 & T2(*) mapping in cardiac, liver, and renal imaging.

Authors:  Ilona A Dekkers; Hildo J Lamb
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory heart diseases.

Authors:  Andrew J M Lewis; Matthew K Burrage; Vanessa M Ferreira
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-06

Review 5.  Clinical Importance of Myocardial T2 Mapping and Texture Analysis.

Authors:  Yasuo Amano; Yuko Omori; Chisato Ando; Fumi Yanagisawa; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Xiaoyan Tang; Hiroko Kobayashi; Ryo Takagi; Naoya Matsumoto
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 6.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Technical Developments and Initial Clinical Validation.

Authors:  G Cruz; O Jaubert; R M Botnar; C Prieto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Detection of Recent Myocardial Infarction Using Native T1 Mapping in a Swine Model: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Chen Cui; Shuli Wang; Minjie Lu; Xuejing Duan; Hongyue Wang; Liujun Jia; Yue Tang; Arlene Sirajuddin; Sanjay K Prasad; Peter Kellman; Andrew E Arai; Shihua Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Role of cardiac T1 mapping and extracellular volume in the assessment of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Laura C Saunders; Andrew J Swift; Jim M Wild; Sven Plein
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.596

9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance native T2 and T2* quantitative values for cardiomyopathies and heart transplantations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G J H Snel; M van den Boomen; L M Hernandez; C T Nguyen; D E Sosnovik; B K Velthuis; R H J A Slart; R J H Borra; N H J Prakken
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Diagnostic and prognostic significance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance native myocardial T1 mapping in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Laura C Saunders; Chris S Johns; Neil J Stewart; Charlotte J E Oram; David A Capener; Valentina O Puntmann; Charlie A Elliot; Robin C Condliffe; David G Kiely; Martin J Graves; Jim M Wild; Andy J Swift
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.