Literature DB >> 28678574

Active Surveillance of Nonfatty Renal Masses in Patients With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: Use of CT Features and Patterns of Growth to Differentiate Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cancer.

Nilo A Avila1,2, Andrew J Dwyer3, Joel Moss2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report our experience with active surveillance of nonfatty renal masses in a large cohort of patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), correlate their CT features and patterns of growth with histopathology results, and provide guidelines for management. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Yearly CT examinations were performed of 367 women (age range, 21-75 years; mean age, 47 years). For the 31 patients with 37 nonfatty renal masses that were biopsied, excised, or followed for ≥ 5 years, CT enhancement characteristics and patterns of growth were compared with the histopathology results.
RESULTS: Four of 37 nonfatty renal masses were biopsied without follow-up CT examinations: Two were heterogeneous renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), one was a heterogeneous nonfatty angiomyolipoma (AML), and one was homogeneous nonfatty AML. In the remaining 33 nonfatty renal masses with multiple follow-up CT examinations, two growth patterns were identified. Four showed a continuous increase in size of > 0.5 cm/y in some years, and all four in this first group were heterogeneous and were biopsy-proven RCC. The second group was composed of the remaining 29 masses. These 29 masses showed yearly no change, increase, or decrease in diameter. Eight were heterogeneous, and 21 were homogeneous. Of the masses showing a yearly increase, the increase was < 0.5 cm/y in all except one. In the one exception, the increase followed a decrease. Nine of the 29 masses were biopsied, and all nine were nonfatty renal masses (five homogeneous, four heterogeneous).
CONCLUSION: Our data provide further evidence in a large prospective study with longterm follow-up that active surveillance is an appropriate strategy in the management of nonfatty renal masses in patients with LAM. Our analysis of the growth patterns reveals duration of growth in addition to growth rate as criteria for biopsy or excision. Biopsy should be reserved for nonfatty renal masses that show sustained growth or growth > 0.5 cm/y during follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active surveillance; lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM); nonfatty renal angiomyolipoma (AML); renal cancer; renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28678574      PMCID: PMC8690630          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.17530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  36 in total

1.  A general model for ontogenetic growth.

Authors:  G B West; J H Brown; B J Enquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Imaging characteristics of minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma with histologic correlations.

Authors:  Jason Hafron; James D Fogarty; David M Hoenig; Maomi Li; Robert Berkenblit; Reza Ghavamian
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass.

Authors:  Steven C Campbell; Andrew C Novick; Arie Belldegrun; Michael L Blute; George K Chow; Ithaar H Derweesh; Martha M Faraday; Jihad H Kaouk; Raymond J Leveillee; Surena F Matin; Paul Russo; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Various radiological appearances of angiomyolipomas in the same kidney.

Authors:  F Obuz; N Karabay; M Seçil; E Igci; A Kovanlikaya; K Yörükoglu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  The management of renal angiomyolipoma.

Authors:  J E Oesterling; E K Fishman; S M Goldman; F F Marshall
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Enhancing renal masses with zero net growth during active surveillance.

Authors:  David A Kunkle; Paul L Crispen; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Natural history of renal masses followed expectantly.

Authors:  W Kassouf; A G Aprikian; M Laplante; S Tanguay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.

Authors:  Jeong Kon Kim; Soo-Youn Park; Jeong-Hee Shon; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT.

Authors:  Naoki Takahashi; Shuai Leng; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Daniel Gomez-Cardona; Prabin Thapa; Rickey E Carter; Bradley C Leibovich; Kewalee Sasiwimonphan; Kohei Sasaguri; Akira Kawashima
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  The Three-Gene Signature in Urinary Extracellular Vesicles from Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Giuseppe De Palma; Fabio Sallustio; Claudia Curci; Vanessa Galleggiante; Monica Rutigliano; Grazia Serino; Pasquale Ditonno; Michele Battaglia; Francesco P Schena
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.207

View more
  2 in total

1.  Can we predict the existence of extrarenal feeders to renal angiomyolipomas?

Authors:  Xixi Zhang; Ryohei Kuwatsuru; Hiroshi Toei; Daiske Yashiro; Shingo Okada; Hitomi Kato
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Efficacy and safety of prophylactic superselective embolization for angiomyolipoma at the renal hilum.

Authors:  Tatsuro Inoue; Xixi Zhang; Ryohei Kuwatsuru; Shingo Okada; Hitomi Kato; Hiromi Ozu; Masataka Yanagida; Yuki Yamashiro
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.