Literature DB >> 28678408

Longitudinal regret after treatment for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Lauren M Hurwitz1,2, Jennifer Cullen1,2,3, Daniel J Kim4, Sally Elsamanoudi1,2,4, Jane Hudak1,2,4, Maryellen Colston1,2,4, Judith Travis1,2,4, Huai-Ching Kuo1,2, Kevin R Rice1,4, Christopher R Porter1,5, Inger L Rosner1,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer patients diagnosed with low- and intermediate-risk disease have several treatment options. Decisional regret after treatment is a concern, especially when poor oncologic outcomes or declines in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) occur. This study assessed determinants of longitudinal decisional regret in prostate cancer patients attending a multidisciplinary clinic and treated with radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT), or active surveillance (AS).
METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center who attended a multidisciplinary clinic were enrolled into a prospective study from 2006 to 2014. The Decision Regret Scale was administered at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months posttreatment. HRQoL was also assessed at regular intervals using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and 36-item RAND Medical Outcomes Study Short Form questionnaires. Adjusted probabilities of reporting regret were estimated via multivariable logistic regression fitted with generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: A total of 652 patients met the inclusion criteria (395 RP, 141 EBRT, 41 BT, 75 AS). Decisional regret was consistently low after all of these treatments. In multivariable models, only African American race (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.47) was associated with greater regret across time. Age and control preference were marginally associated with regret. Regret scores were similar between RP patients who did and did not experience biochemical recurrence. Declines in HRQoL were weakly correlated with greater decisional regret.
CONCLUSION: In the context of a multidisciplinary clinic, decisional regret did not differ significantly between treatment groups but was greater in African Americans and those reporting poorer HRQoL. Cancer 2017;123:4252-4258.
© 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; multidisciplinary clinic; prostate cancer; regret; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28678408     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  Decision-making and improvements in health-related quality of life in patients with kidney stones: comparing surgery versus observation using a mixed methods analysis.

Authors:  Connor M Forbes; Kemberlee Bonnet; Tracy Bryant; David G Schlundt; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Ryan S Hsi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.861

2.  Reply to K.P. Weinfurt et al.

Authors:  Nnenaya Q Agochukwu; Daniela Wittmann; Nicholas R Boileau; Rodney L Dunn; James Montie; Tae Kim; David C Miller; James Peabody; Noelle E Carlozzi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 50.717

3.  Decision regret, adverse outcomes, and treatment choice in men with localized prostate cancer: Results from a multi-site randomized trial.

Authors:  Donna L Berry; Fangxin Hong; Traci M Blonquist; Barbara Halpenny; Niya Xiong; Christopher P Filson; Viraj A Master; Martin G Sanda; Peter Chang; Gary W Chien; Randy A Jones; Tracey L Krupski; Seth Wolpin; Leslie Wilson; Julia H Hayes; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Mitchell Sokoloff
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.954

4.  Changes in risk-group stratification of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy at the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology over time.

Authors:  Benjamin Shiff; Premal Patel; Kiril Trpkov; Geoffrey T Gotto
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-03-20

5.  Decision Regret and Quality of Life after Focal Therapy with Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy (TOOKAD®) for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Luka Flegar; Martin Baunacke; Bjoern Thorben Buerk; Rick Proschmann; Aristeidis Zacharis; Stefan Propping; Johannes Huber; Christian Thomas; Angelika Borkowetz
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.934

6.  Current Opinion Regarding Multidisciplinary Cancer Clinic Utilization for the Management of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel J Lama; Matthew Kasson; Connor Hoge; Tian Guan; Marepalli Rao; Timothy Struve; Sadhna Verma; Abhinav Sidana
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2021-05-28

7.  Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Nina C A Vermeer; Maxime J M van der Valk; Heleen S Snijders; Hans F A Vasen; Arthur Gerritsen van der Hoop; Onno R Guicherit; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Anne M Stiggelbout; Koen C M J Peeters
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.