Literature DB >> 28678070

Tranexamic Acid Does Not Influence Cardioprotection by Ischemic Preconditioning and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning.

Patrick van Caster1, Sandra Eiling1, Yvonne Boekholt1, Friederike Behmenburg1, Marianne Dorsch1, André Heinen2, Markus W Hollmann3, Ragnar Huhn1.   

Abstract

Prior studies have suggested that the antifibrinolytic drug aprotinin increases the infarct size after ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) and attenuates the effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Aprotinin was replaced by tranexamic acid (TXA) in clinical practice. Here, we investigated whether TXA influences I/R injury and/or cardioprotection initiated by IPC and/or remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC). Anesthetized male Wistar rats were randomized to 6 groups. Control animals were not further treated. Administration of TXA was combined with and without IPC and RIPC. Estimated treatment effect was 20%. Compared to control group (56% ± 11%), IPC reduced infarct size by 46% (30% ± 6%; mean difference, 26%; 95% confidence interval, 19-33; P < .0001), and RIPC reduced infarct size by 29% (40% ± 8%; mean difference, 16%; 95% confidence interval, 9-24; P < .011). Additional application of TXA had no effect on I/R injury and cardioprotection by IPC or RIPC. TXA does not abolish infarct size reduction by IPC or RIPC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28678070     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  1 in total

1.  Ischemic Preconditioning and the Role of Antifibrinolytic Drugs: Translation From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Quintin J Quinones; Jerrold H Levy
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.108

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.