Samantha M McEvedy1, Jan Cameron2, Eugene Lugg3, Jennifer Miller4, Chris Haedtke4, Muna Hammash5, Martha J Biddle4, Kyoung Suk Lee6, Justin A Mariani2,3,7, Chantal F Ski8, David R Thompson8, Misook Lee Chung4, Debra K Moser4. 1. 1 School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 2. 2 Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 3. 3 St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia. 4. 4 College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 5. 5 School of Nursing, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. 6. 6 College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea. 7. 7 Heart Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 8. 8 Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: End-of-life implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions should commence before device implantation and be ongoing, yet many implantable cardioverter defibrillators remain active in patients' last days. AIM: To examine associations among implantable cardioverter defibrillator knowledge, patient characteristics and attitudes to implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using the Experiences, Attitudes and Knowledge of End-of-Life Issues in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients Questionnaire. Participants were classified as insufficient or sufficient implantable cardioverter defibrillator knowledge and the two groups were compared. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients ( n = 270, mean age 61 ± 14 years; 73% male) were recruited from cardiology and implantable cardioverter defibrillator clinics attached to two tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, and two in Kentucky, the United States. RESULTS: Participants with insufficient implantable cardioverter defibrillator knowledge ( n = 77, 29%) were significantly older (mean age 66 vs 60 years, p = 0.001), less likely to be Caucasian (77% vs 87%, p = 0.047), less likely to have received implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks (26% vs 40%, p = 0.031), and more likely to have indications of mild cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <24: 44% vs 16%, p < 0.001). Insufficient implantable cardioverter defibrillator knowledge was associated with attitudes suggesting unwillingness to discuss implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation, even during the last days towards end of life ( p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients, especially those who are older or have mild cognitive impairment, often have limited knowledge about implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation. This study identified several potential teachable moments throughout the patients' treatment trajectory. An interdisciplinary approach is required to ensure that discussions about implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation issues are initiated at appropriate time points, with family members ideally also included.
BACKGROUND: End-of-life implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions should commence before device implantation and be ongoing, yet many implantable cardioverter defibrillators remain active in patients' last days. AIM: To examine associations among implantable cardioverter defibrillator knowledge, patient characteristics and attitudes to implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using the Experiences, Attitudes and Knowledge of End-of-Life Issues in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients Questionnaire. Participants were classified as insufficient or sufficient implantable cardioverter defibrillator knowledge and the two groups were compared. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients ( n = 270, mean age 61 ± 14 years; 73% male) were recruited from cardiology and implantable cardioverter defibrillator clinics attached to two tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, and two in Kentucky, the United States. RESULTS:Participants with insufficient implantable cardioverter defibrillator knowledge ( n = 77, 29%) were significantly older (mean age 66 vs 60 years, p = 0.001), less likely to be Caucasian (77% vs 87%, p = 0.047), less likely to have received implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks (26% vs 40%, p = 0.031), and more likely to have indications of mild cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <24: 44% vs 16%, p < 0.001). Insufficient implantable cardioverter defibrillator knowledge was associated with attitudes suggesting unwillingness to discuss implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation, even during the last days towards end of life ( p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients, especially those who are older or have mild cognitive impairment, often have limited knowledge about implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation. This study identified several potential teachable moments throughout the patients' treatment trajectory. An interdisciplinary approach is required to ensure that discussions about implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation issues are initiated at appropriate time points, with family members ideally also included.
Authors: Loreena Hill; Sonja McIlfatrick; Brian Taylor; Lana Dixon; Mark Harbinson; Donna Fitzsimons Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Ingela Thylén; Debra K Moser; Misook L Chung; Jennifer Miller; Christina Fluur; Anna Strömberg Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vessel Date: 2013-11-13
Authors: Rik Stoevelaar; Arianne Brinkman-Stoppelenburg; Anne Geert van Driel; Rozemarijn L van Bruchem-Visser; Dominic Amj Theuns; Rohit E Bhagwandien; Agnes Van der Heide; Judith Ac Rietjens Journal: Heart Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Holly Standing; Richard G Thomson; Darren Flynn; Julian Hughes; Kerry Joyce; Trudie Lobban; Stephen Lord; Dan D Matlock; Janet M McComb; Paul Paes; Chris Wilkinson; Catherine Exley Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 2.692