BACKGROUND: The recent approval of several fixed-dose combination long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) products has increased the use of dual bronchodilators in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Understanding the comparative safety of this combination is important for informing treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular (CCV) events associated with LABA/LAMA compared with a combination of LABA and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using health insurance claims data to identify COPD patients initiating LABA/LAMA or LABA/ICS. CCV outcomes included hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis for acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmia, stroke, or transient ischemic attack. Patients were followed until they experienced an event, discontinued treatment, initiated medication from the opposite cohort, or lost enrollment. Patients were matched 1:4 on propensity scores, and time to event was compared using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: After matching, there were 3842 patients in the LABA/LAMA cohort and 15 225 in the LABA/ICS cohort. Cardiovascular events in the LABA/LAMA cohort were lower than in the LABA/ICS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.794; 95% CI = 0.623-0.997. No significant difference in the risk of cerebrovascular events (HR = 1.166; 95% CI = 0.653-1.959) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns about the CCV effects of LAMA and LABA monotherapy, the LABA/LAMA combination had similar or lower risk of these events in comparison to LABA/ICS. Further studies are recommended to confirm these findings.
BACKGROUND: The recent approval of several fixed-dose combination long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) products has increased the use of dual bronchodilators in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Understanding the comparative safety of this combination is important for informing treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular (CCV) events associated with LABA/LAMA compared with a combination of LABA and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using health insurance claims data to identify COPDpatients initiating LABA/LAMA or LABA/ICS. CCV outcomes included hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis for acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmia, stroke, or transient ischemic attack. Patients were followed until they experienced an event, discontinued treatment, initiated medication from the opposite cohort, or lost enrollment. Patients were matched 1:4 on propensity scores, and time to event was compared using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: After matching, there were 3842 patients in the LABA/LAMA cohort and 15 225 in the LABA/ICS cohort. Cardiovascular events in the LABA/LAMA cohort were lower than in the LABA/ICS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.794; 95% CI = 0.623-0.997. No significant difference in the risk of cerebrovascular events (HR = 1.166; 95% CI = 0.653-1.959) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns about the CCV effects of LAMA and LABA monotherapy, the LABA/LAMA combination had similar or lower risk of these events in comparison to LABA/ICS. Further studies are recommended to confirm these findings.
Authors: Jesús Recio Iglesias; Jesús Díez-Manglano; Francisco López García; José Antonio Díaz Peromingo; Pere Almagro; José Manuel Varela Aguilar Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2020-05-07
Authors: Nicola C Day; Subramanya Kumar; Gerard Criner; Mark Dransfield; David M G Halpin; MeiLan K Han; C Elaine Jones; Morrys C Kaisermann; Sally Kilbride; Peter Lange; David A Lomas; Neil Martin; Fernando J Martinez; Dave Singh; Robert Wise; David A Lipson Journal: Respir Res Date: 2020-06-05
Authors: Lianne Parkin; Sheila Williams; David Barson; Katrina Sharples; Simon Horsburgh; Rod Jackson; Jack Dummer Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2021-01
Authors: Lianne Parkin; Sheila Williams; Katrina Sharples; David Barson; Simon Horsburgh; Rod Jackson; Billy Wu; Jack Dummer Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 8.989