Lars Thrysoee1, Anna Strömberg2, Axel Brandes1, Jeroen M Hendriks2,3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 2. Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. 3. Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To gain in-depth knowledge of patients' experiences of the consultation processes at a multidisciplinary atrial fibrillation outpatient clinic in a university hospital in Denmark. BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with morbidity and mortality if not diagnosed and treated as recommended. Patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation preferably should be managed in an outpatient setting which includes medical examination, patient education and decision-making on medical therapy. DESIGN: This is a qualitative study of 14 patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, ranging from asymptomatic patients, to those with mild to severe symptoms; they were all referred from general practitioners. METHODS: Data were generated in 2013-2015 using participant observation during each consultation, followed by individual interviews postconsultation. RESULTS: Patients were referred with limited information on AF and knowledge about the management consultation procedures. The consultations were performed in a professional way by the cardiologist as well as by the nurses with an emphasis on the medical aspects of atrial fibrillation. The understanding that atrial fibrillation is not a fatal disease in itself was very important for patients. At the same time, visiting the clinic was overwhelming, information was difficult to understand, and patients found it difficult to be involved in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that patients were uncertain on what AF was before as well as after their consultation. The communication was concentrated on the medical aspects of atrial fibrillation and visiting the clinic was an overwhelming experience for the patients. They had difficulty understanding what atrial fibrillation was, why they were treated with anticoagulation, and that anticoagulating was a lifelong treatment. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study demonstrates some lack of patient-centred care and an absence of tailored patient AF-related education. Furthermore, the study highlights the need for and importance of active patient involvement.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To gain in-depth knowledge of patients' experiences of the consultation processes at a multidisciplinary atrial fibrillationoutpatient clinic in a university hospital in Denmark. BACKGROUND:Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with morbidity and mortality if not diagnosed and treated as recommended. Patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation preferably should be managed in an outpatient setting which includes medical examination, patient education and decision-making on medical therapy. DESIGN: This is a qualitative study of 14 patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, ranging from asymptomatic patients, to those with mild to severe symptoms; they were all referred from general practitioners. METHODS: Data were generated in 2013-2015 using participant observation during each consultation, followed by individual interviews postconsultation. RESULTS:Patients were referred with limited information on AF and knowledge about the management consultation procedures. The consultations were performed in a professional way by the cardiologist as well as by the nurses with an emphasis on the medical aspects of atrial fibrillation. The understanding that atrial fibrillation is not a fatal disease in itself was very important for patients. At the same time, visiting the clinic was overwhelming, information was difficult to understand, and patients found it difficult to be involved in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that patients were uncertain on what AF was before as well as after their consultation. The communication was concentrated on the medical aspects of atrial fibrillation and visiting the clinic was an overwhelming experience for the patients. They had difficulty understanding what atrial fibrillation was, why they were treated with anticoagulation, and that anticoagulating was a lifelong treatment. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study demonstrates some lack of patient-centred care and an absence of tailored patientAF-related education. Furthermore, the study highlights the need for and importance of active patient involvement.
Authors: Caroline Thorup Ladegaard; Carsten Bamberg; Mathias Aalling; Dorthea Marie Jensen; Nina Kamstrup-Larsen; Christoffer Valdorff Madsen; Sadaf Kamil; Henrik Gudbergsen; Thomas Saxild; Michaela Louise Schiøtz; Julie Grew; Luana Sandoval Castillo; Anne Frølich; Helena Domínguez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Vanessa W S Ng; Chung-Wah Siu; Patrick K C Chiu; Carolyn P L Kng; Elizabeth Jamieson; Ian C K Wong; May P S Lam Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Mark Lown; Christopher R Wilcox; Stephanie Hughes; Miriam Santer; George Lewith; Michael Moore; Paul Little Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Aileen Murphy; Stephen Brosnan; Stephen McCarthy; Paidi O'Raghallaigh; Colin Bradley; Ann Kirby Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 2.692