Literature DB >> 28677157

Fungal interactions reduce carbon use efficiency.

Daniel S Maynard1,2, Thomas W Crowther1,3, Mark A Bradford1.   

Abstract

The efficiency by which fungi decompose organic matter contributes to the amount of carbon that is retained in biomass vs. lost to the atmosphere as respiration. This carbon use efficiency (CUE) is affected by various abiotic conditions, including temperature and nutrient availability. Theoretically, the physiological costs of interspecific interactions should likewise alter CUE, yet the magnitude of these costs is untested. Here we conduct a microcosm experiment to quantify how interactions among wood-decay basidiomycete fungi alter growth, respiration and CUE across a temperature and nitrogen gradient. We show that species interactions induced consistent declines in CUE, regardless of abiotic conditions. Multispecies communities exhibited reductions in CUE of up to 25% relative to individual CUE, with this biotic effect being greater than the observed variation attributable to abiotic conditions. Our results suggest that the extent to which fungal-mediated carbon fluxes respond to environmental change may be influenced strongly by species interactions.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biogeochemical; biotic interactions; carbon cycle; diversity function; interference

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28677157     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  7 in total

1.  Competitive network determines the direction of the diversity-function relationship.

Authors:  Daniel S Maynard; Thomas W Crowther; Mark A Bradford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A trait-based understanding of wood decomposition by fungi.

Authors:  Nicky Lustenhouwer; Daniel S Maynard; Mark A Bradford; Daniel L Lindner; Brad Oberle; Amy E Zanne; Thomas W Crowther
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Life and death in the soil microbiome: how ecological processes influence biogeochemistry.

Authors:  Noah W Sokol; Eric Slessarev; Gianna L Marschmann; Alexa Nicolas; Steven J Blazewicz; Eoin L Brodie; Mary K Firestone; Megan M Foley; Rachel Hestrin; Bruce A Hungate; Benjamin J Koch; Bram W Stone; Matthew B Sullivan; Olivier Zablocki; Jennifer Pett-Ridge
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 78.297

4.  Competitive interaction with keystone taxa induced negative priming under biochar amendments.

Authors:  Lijun Chen; Yuji Jiang; Chao Liang; Yu Luo; Qinsong Xu; Cheng Han; Qiguo Zhao; Bo Sun
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 14.650

5.  Interactions in self-assembled microbial communities saturate with diversity.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Yu; Martin F Polz; Eric J Alm
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Decay stages of wood and associated fungal communities characterise diversity-decomposition relationships.

Authors:  Yu Fukasawa; Kimiyo Matsukura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Discrete taxa of saprotrophic fungi respire different ages of carbon from Antarctic soils.

Authors:  Kevin K Newsham; Mark H Garnett; Clare H Robinson; Filipa Cox
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.