Literature DB >> 28676314

Cerebrospinal fluid leaks after transsphenoidal surgery - Effect of a polyethylene glycol hydrogel dural sealant.

Erlick A C Pereira1, Carly A Grandidge2, Victoria A Nowak2, Simon A Cudlip2.   

Abstract

To investigate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rates after mainly endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery with and without polyethylene glycol hydrogel dural sealant (DuraSeal®), we prospectively collected data from a single-centre consecutive case series over four years from January 2007 to December 2010 inclusive. 250 patients were identified (135 male, 115 female; median age 52years, range 14-83). 180 patients received DuraSeal® (72%). 85 (34%) had intra-operative dural breach and 13 (5.2%) developed post-operative CSF leaks (3 without intra-operative dural breach) requiring lumbar drainage or formal repair. Of this group 5/251 (2.0%) patients required a formal repair. Post-operative CSF leak was seen in 5/189 (2.7%) of patients with pituitary adenoma, of which 2/5 (40%) were in cases undergoing revision surgery. 5/13 (38.4%) patients who developed a CSF leak presented with either Rathke's cleft cyst or craniopharyngioma. 3/71 patients not receiving DuraSeal® leaked (4.2%) and 10/180 patients receiving DuraSeal® leaked (5.6%). 11/234 patients without Tisseel (4.7%) and 2/16 receiving Tisseel (12.5%) leaked. 54 patients (22%) received intra-operative lumbar drains, one of whom developed subsequent CSF leak (1.9%), in contrast to 12/197 (6.1%) of patients without intra-operative lumbar drains who later developed CSF leak. The rate of post-operative CSF leak requiring re-exploration and nasoseptal flap repair was low (2.0%) in this mainly endoscopic case series without statistically significant benefit from either DuraSeal® or Tisseel. Intra-operative and post-operative lumbar drainage appears beneficial in patients at higher risk of post-operative CSF leak.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebrospinal fluid leak; DuraSeal®; Endoscopic; Tisseel; Transsphenoidal adenohypophysectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28676314     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  9 in total

1.  2D versus 3D Endoscopy: Head-to-Head Comparison in a Simulated Model of Endoscopic Endonasal Dural Suturing.

Authors:  Ivanna Nebor; Zoe Anderson; Juan C Mejia-Munne; Ahmed Hussein; Kora Montemagno; Rebecca Fumagalli; Ikrame Labiad; Yash Patil; Norberto Andaluz; Ahmad R Sedaghat; Mario Zuccarello; Jonathan A Forbes
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-11-08

2.  A Single Layer Synthetic Dural Substitute Inlay is an Effective Sellar Reconstruction Technique in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery.

Authors:  Mark B Chaskes; Tawfiq Khoury; Chandala Chitguppi; Pascal Lavergne; Gurston G Nyquist; Mindy R Rabinowitz; Marc R Rosen; James J Evans
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-12-14

3.  Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Dorismond; Griffin D Santarelli; Brian D Thorp; Adam J Kimple; Charles S Ebert; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-07

4.  Fibrin-coated collagen fleece versus absorbable dural sealant for sellar closure after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a comparative study.

Authors:  Justin Moore; Nathalie Zaidman; Isabel Fernandes Arroteia; Geoffrey Appelboom; Sami Barrit; Sébastien Carlot; Viviane De Maertelaer; Sergio Hassid; Olivier De Witte; Julien Spitaels
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol dural sealant system in cranial and spinal neurosurgical procedures: Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed Diab; Hieder Al-Shami; Ahmed Negida; Ahmed Gadallah; Hossam Farag; Doaa Mahmoud Elkadi; Mo'tasem Muhamed Gaber; Mahmoud Ahmed Ebada
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-04-26

6.  Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative Lumbar Drain in Endoscopic Skull Base Tumor Resection: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoming Guo; Yueli Zhu; Yuan Hong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Pedicled frontal periosteal rescue flap via eyebrow incision for skull base reconstruction (SevEN-002).

Authors:  Chang Ki Jang; Soo Jeong Park; Eui Hyun Kim; Jin Mo Cho; Ju Hyung Moon; Kyoung Su Sung; Je Beom Hong; Jaejoon Joon Lim; Minkyun Na; Chang-Ki Hong; Tae Hoon Roh; Jiwoong Oh
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.030

8.  A Simple Onlay Sellar Reconstruction Does Not Increase the Risk of Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak in Well-Selected Patients.

Authors:  Mark B Chaskes; Judd H Fastenberg; Swar Vimawala; Gurston F Nyquist; Mindy R Rabinowitz; Chandala Chitguppi; Meagan Falls; Tomas Garzon-Muvdi; Marc R Rosen; James J Evans
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-01-08

9.  Skull base repair following endonasal pituitary and skull base tumour resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danyal Z Khan; Ahmad M S Ali; Chan Hee Koh; Neil L Dorward; Joan Grieve; Hugo Layard Horsfall; William Muirhead; Thomas Santarius; Wouter R Van Furth; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Hani J Marcus
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.107

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.