Literature DB >> 28676243

Characteristics of hospitalizations for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction in the United States.

Udhay Krishnan1, Josef A Brejt2, Joshua Schulman-Marcus3, Rajesh V Swaminathan4, Dmitriy N Feldman2, S Chiu Wong2, Parag Goyal2, Evelyn M Horn2, Maria Karas2, Irina Sobol2, Robert M Minutello2, Geoffrey Bergman2, Harsimran Singh2, Luke K Kim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have reported a decline in mortality for patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction (CS-AMI), a finding which has been attributed to an increase in revascularization over the past decade. However, other studies that have focused on CS-AMI patients treated with early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have found no improvement in risk-adjusted mortality. To reconcile these discordances, we hypothesize that the clinical complexity of the PCI-population has changed over time, in ways not precisely adjusted for in previous studies.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2005-2012 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients with CS-AMI who underwent PCI within 24h of hospitalization were identified. Temporal trends in clinical characteristics and in-hospital mortality were analyzed.
RESULTS: There was no significant change in un-adjusted in-hospital mortality (30% in 2005-2006 and 27.8% in 2011-2012, OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.79-1.01, p=0.07). There was an increase in the proportion of patients with ≥3 Elixhauser comorbidities and comorbidity scores ≥5. The population of patients that suffered from cardiac arrest or needed intubation on the first hospital day increased from 27.8% to 42.6% (ptrend<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, mortality rates in 2011-2012 versus 2005-2006 decreased significantly (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65-0.85, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: During a period that corresponds to expanded PCI use and improved prehospital survival, risk-adjusted mortality declined. Much of the survival benefit attributable to early revascularization has been neutralized by an increase in prevalence of "extreme-risk" patients. This may contribute to the null effect on in-hospital mortality.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiac arrest; Cardiogenic shock; Mortality; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28676243     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cardiogenic Shock: Recent Developments and Significant Knowledge Gaps.

Authors:  Hiren Patel; Haider Nazeer; Neil Yager; Joshua Schulman-Marcus
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-24

2.  Baseline characteristics, management, and predictors of early mortality in cardiogenic shock: insights from the FRENSHOCK registry.

Authors:  Clement Delmas; François Roubille; Nicolas Lamblin; Laurent Bonello; Guillaume Leurent; Bruno Levy; Meyer Elbaz; Nicolas Danchin; Sebastien Champion; Pascal Lim; Francis Schneider; Alain Cariou; Hadi Khachab; Jeremy Bourenne; Marie-France Seronde; Guillaume Schurtz; Brahim Harbaoui; Gerald Vanzetto; Charlotte Quentin; Xavier Delabranche; Nadia Aissaoui; Nicolas Combaret; Stephane Manzo-Silberman; Danka Tomasevic; Benjamin Marchandot; Benoit Lattuca; Patrick Henry; Edouard Gerbaud; Eric Bonnefoy; Etienne Puymirat
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-12-31

3.  Factors Associated with the Prognosis of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Ke-Fu Feng; Min Wu; Li-Kun Ma
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-07-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.