Robert D Pesek1, Mallikarjuna Rettiganti2, Erin O'Brien3, Sarah Beckwith3, Caroline Daniel3, Chunqiao Luo2, Amy M Scurlock3, Peggy Chandler3, Rebecca A Levy4, Tamara T Perry3, Joshua L Kennedy3, Sheva Chervinskiy3, Maryelle Vonlanthen5, Helen Casteel5, Stephen C Fiedorek6, Troy Gibbons7, Stacie M Jones3. 1. Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children's Hospital and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas. Electronic address: rdpesek@uams.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Arkansas Children's Hospital and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas. 3. Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children's Hospital and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas. 4. Department of Pathology, Arkansas Children's Hospital and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas. 5. Pediatric Gastroenterology Associates, Little Rock, Arkansas. 6. Pediatric Clinic, North Little Rock, Arkansas. 7. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) foods are the most common disease triggers, but environmental allergens are also suspected culprits. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of environmental allergen sensitization on response to treatment in children with EoE in the southeastern United States. METHODS: Patients 2 to 18 years old who were referred to the Arkansas Children's Hospital Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders Clinic from January 2012 to January 2016 were enrolled in a prospective, longitudinal cohort study with collection of demographics, clinical symptoms, medical history, allergy sensitization profiles, and response to treatment over time. Comparisons were made between complete responders (peak esophageal eosinophil count <15 per high-power field [HPF]) and nonresponders (>25 eosinophils per HPF) after treatment with diet elimination alone, swallowed corticosteroids alone, or diet elimination and swallowed corticosteroids. Sensitization patterns to environmental allergens found in the southeastern United States were analyzed for the effect on treatment response. RESULTS: A total of 223 individuals were enrolled. Of these, 182 had environmental allergy profiling and at least one endoscopy while receiving proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Twenty-nine individuals had PPI-responsive EoE and were excluded from further analysis, leaving 123 individuals with non-PPI-responsive EoE who were further analyzed; 72 (58.5%) were complete responders and 33 (26.8%) were nonresponders. Seventeen individuals (13.8%) were partial responders (≥1 but ≤25 eosinophils per HPF) and excluded from further analysis. Nonresponders were more likely to be sensitized to perennial allergens (P = .02). There was no significant difference in response based on seasonal allergen sensitization. Individuals with mold or cockroach sensitization were more likely to fail combination diet and swallowed corticosteroid treatment (P = .02 and P = .002). CONCLUSION: Perennial allergen and mold sensitization may lead to nonresponse to EoE treatment in some patients. Additional studies are needed to further understand the effect of environmental allergens on EoE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01779154.
BACKGROUND: In children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) foods are the most common disease triggers, but environmental allergens are also suspected culprits. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of environmental allergen sensitization on response to treatment in children with EoE in the southeastern United States. METHODS:Patients 2 to 18 years old who were referred to the Arkansas Children's Hospital Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders Clinic from January 2012 to January 2016 were enrolled in a prospective, longitudinal cohort study with collection of demographics, clinical symptoms, medical history, allergy sensitization profiles, and response to treatment over time. Comparisons were made between complete responders (peak esophageal eosinophil count <15 per high-power field [HPF]) and nonresponders (>25 eosinophils per HPF) after treatment with diet elimination alone, swallowed corticosteroids alone, or diet elimination and swallowed corticosteroids. Sensitization patterns to environmental allergens found in the southeastern United States were analyzed for the effect on treatment response. RESULTS: A total of 223 individuals were enrolled. Of these, 182 had environmental allergy profiling and at least one endoscopy while receiving proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Twenty-nine individuals had PPI-responsive EoE and were excluded from further analysis, leaving 123 individuals with non-PPI-responsive EoE who were further analyzed; 72 (58.5%) were complete responders and 33 (26.8%) were nonresponders. Seventeen individuals (13.8%) were partial responders (≥1 but ≤25 eosinophils per HPF) and excluded from further analysis. Nonresponders were more likely to be sensitized to perennial allergens (P = .02). There was no significant difference in response based on seasonal allergen sensitization. Individuals with mold or cockroach sensitization were more likely to fail combination diet and swallowed corticosteroid treatment (P = .02 and P = .002). CONCLUSION: Perennial allergen and mold sensitization may lead to nonresponse to EoE treatment in some patients. Additional studies are needed to further understand the effect of environmental allergens on EoE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01779154.
Authors: Chris A Liacouras; Jonathan M Spergel; Eduardo Ruchelli; Ritu Verma; Maria Mascarenhas; Edisio Semeao; Jonathan Flick; Janice Kelly; Terry Brown-Whitehorn; Petar Mamula; Jonathan E Markowitz Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Jonathan M Spergel; Wendy M Book; Elizabeth Mays; Lihal Song; Samir S Shah; Nicholas J Talley; Peter A Bonis Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Swathi Eluri; Sara R Selitsky; Irina Perjar; Johnathan Hollyfield; Renee Betancourt; Cara Randall; Spencer Rusin; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen; Evan S Dellon Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Benjamin S Robey; Swathi Eluri; Craig C Reed; Maya R Jerath; Michelle L Hernandez; Scott P Commins; Evan S Dellon Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2019-03-02 Impact factor: 6.347