Literature DB >> 28675881

Making sense of the noise: The effect of hydrology on silver carp eDNA detection in the Chicago area waterway system.

Jeffery W Song1, Mitchell J Small1, Elizabeth A Casman2.   

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is an emerging tool for monitoring the spread of aquatic invasive species. One confounding factor when interpreting eDNA sampling evidence is that eDNA can be present in the water in the absence of living target organisms, originating from excreta, dead tissue, boats, or sewage effluent, etc. In the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS), electric fish dispersal barriers were built to prevent non-native Asian carp species from invading Lake Michigan, and yet Asian carp eDNA has been detected above the barriers sporadically since 2009. In this paper the influence of stream flow characteristics in the CAWS on the probability of invasive Asian carp eDNA detection in the CAWS from 2009 to 2012 was examined. In the CAWS, the direction of stream flow is mostly away from Lake Michigan, though there are infrequent reversals in flow direction towards Lake Michigan during dry spells. We find that the flow reversal volume into the Lake has a statistically significant positive relationship with eDNA detection probability, while other covariates, like gage height, precipitation, season, water temperature, dissolved oxygen concentration, pH and chlorophyll concentration do not. This suggests that stream flow direction is highly influential on eDNA detection in the CAWS and should be considered when interpreting eDNA evidence. We also find that the beta-binomial regression model provides a stronger fit for eDNA detection probability compared to a binomial regression model. This paper provides a statistical modeling framework for interpreting eDNA sampling evidence and for evaluating covariates influencing eDNA detection.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beta-binomial regression; Environmental DNA; Hydrology; Invasive carp

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28675881     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

Review 1.  Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity.

Authors:  Jori B Harrison; Jennifer M Sunday; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Can nuclear aquatic environmental DNA be a genetic marker for the accurate estimation of species abundance?

Authors:  Toshiaki S Jo; Kenji Tsuri; Hiroki Yamanaka
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2022-07-21

3.  Detection of Galba truncatula, Fasciola hepatica and Calicophoron daubneyi environmental DNA within water sources on pasture land, a future tool for fluke control?

Authors:  Rhys Aled Jones; Peter M Brophy; Chelsea N Davis; Teri E Davies; Holly Emberson; Pauline Rees Stevens; Hefin Wyn Williams
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Nonlinear relationship between Silver Carp density and their eDNA concentration in a large river.

Authors:  David P Coulter; Ping Wang; Alison A Coulter; Grace E Van Susteren; Jessica J Eichmiller; James E Garvey; Peter W Sorensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Composition and distribution of fish environmental DNA in an Adirondack watershed.

Authors:  Robert S Cornman; James E McKenna; Jennifer A Fike
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in an endangered sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) monitoring program.

Authors:  Dan Yu; Zhongyuan Shen; Tao Chang; Sha Li; Huanzhang Liu
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-01

7.  Limitations of eDNA analysis for Carcinus maenas abundance estimations.

Authors:  Ariella M Danziger; Zachary H Olson; Markus Frederich
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.