Nasser A Alsabaani1, Nabil J Awadalla2,3, Ibrahim H Abu Saq4, Zeyad M Abualiat4, Mohammed A Alshahrani4, Abdulaziz M Alqahtani4, Masoud M Alshuraym4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia. 2. Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. 3. Family and Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia. 4. Medical Intern, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dental practitioners are at high risk of occupational ocular incidents during their daily work practice. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, pattern and determinants of ocular incidents and to establish the use of eye protection by dental staff in southwestern Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted among dental practitioners working in private, military and Ministry of Health dental clinics in southwestern Saudi Arabia. A predesigned self-report questionnaire was used to elicit information on demographics, splash or foreign body ocular incidents, postincident practices and use of eye protection. RESULTS: Of the 233 dental practitioners examined, 29.6% and 51.1% reported ocular incidents as a result of foreign bodies and fluid splashing, respectively. The risk of ocular incidents as a result of fluid splashing was significantly higher in the absence of postgraduate qualification [odds ratio (OR) = 3.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.70-5.43], poor compliance with wearing eye protection (OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.49-4.28) and long work hours (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.17-3.96). The most frequent postexposure practice was to rinse eyes under running water (87.5%). Approximately 4.2% and 9.2% of dental practitioners reported incidents of ocular injury and infection, respectively, and 14% reported that they never wore any eye protection. CONCLUSION: Occupational ocular incidents as a result of splashing and foreign bodies are relatively common among dental practitioners in southwestern Saudi Arabia. The absence of postgraduate qualification, poor compliance with wearing eye protection and working long hours are predictors of ocular incidents. Awareness about eye safety is therefore considered mandatory for dental practitioners in southwestern Saudi Arabia. Also, dental clinic administrators should provide and promote the use of eye protection.
BACKGROUND: Dental practitioners are at high risk of occupational ocular incidents during their daily work practice. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, pattern and determinants of ocular incidents and to establish the use of eye protection by dental staff in southwestern Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted among dental practitioners working in private, military and Ministry of Health dental clinics in southwestern Saudi Arabia. A predesigned self-report questionnaire was used to elicit information on demographics, splash or foreign body ocular incidents, postincident practices and use of eye protection. RESULTS: Of the 233 dental practitioners examined, 29.6% and 51.1% reported ocular incidents as a result of foreign bodies and fluid splashing, respectively. The risk of ocular incidents as a result of fluid splashing was significantly higher in the absence of postgraduate qualification [odds ratio (OR) = 3.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.70-5.43], poor compliance with wearing eye protection (OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.49-4.28) and long work hours (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.17-3.96). The most frequent postexposure practice was to rinse eyes under running water (87.5%). Approximately 4.2% and 9.2% of dental practitioners reported incidents of ocular injury and infection, respectively, and 14% reported that they never wore any eye protection. CONCLUSION: Occupational ocular incidents as a result of splashing and foreign bodies are relatively common among dental practitioners in southwestern Saudi Arabia. The absence of postgraduate qualification, poor compliance with wearing eye protection and working long hours are predictors of ocular incidents. Awareness about eye safety is therefore considered mandatory for dental practitioners in southwestern Saudi Arabia. Also, dental clinic administrators should provide and promote the use of eye protection.
Authors: Jennifer L Cleveland; Laurie Barker; Barbara F Gooch; Elise M Beltrami; Denise Cardo Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.634