Simon Tobitt1, Robert Percival2. 1. a South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Croydon Recovery & Rehabilitation Team , London , UK and. 2. b Salomons Centre for Applied Psychology, Canterbury Christ Church University , Canterbury , UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: UK society is undergoing a technological revolution, including meeting health needs through technology. Government policy is shifting towards a "digital by default" position. Studies have trialled health technology interventions for those experiencing psychosis and shown them to be useful. AIMS: To gauge levels of engagement with mobile phones (Internet-enabled or cell phone), computers and the Internet in the specific population of community mental health rehabilitation. METHOD: Two surveys were conducted: with service-users on use/non-use of technologies, and interest in technology interventions and support; and with placements on facilities and support available to service-users. RESULTS: Levels of engagement in this population were substantially less than those recorded in the general UK and other clinical populations: 40.2% regularly use mobiles, 17.5% computers, and 14.4% the Internet. Users of all three technologies were significantly younger than non-users. Users of mobiles and computers were significantly more likely to live in lower support/higher independence placements. Of surveyed placements, 35.5% provide a communal computer and 38.7% IT skills sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Community mental health rehabilitation service-users risk finding themselves excluded by a "digital divide". Action is needed to ensure equal access to online opportunities, including healthcare innovations. Clinical and policy implications are discussed.
BACKGROUND: UK society is undergoing a technological revolution, including meeting health needs through technology. Government policy is shifting towards a "digital by default" position. Studies have trialled health technology interventions for those experiencing psychosis and shown them to be useful. AIMS: To gauge levels of engagement with mobile phones (Internet-enabled or cell phone), computers and the Internet in the specific population of community mental health rehabilitation. METHOD: Two surveys were conducted: with service-users on use/non-use of technologies, and interest in technology interventions and support; and with placements on facilities and support available to service-users. RESULTS: Levels of engagement in this population were substantially less than those recorded in the general UK and other clinical populations: 40.2% regularly use mobiles, 17.5% computers, and 14.4% the Internet. Users of all three technologies were significantly younger than non-users. Users of mobiles and computers were significantly more likely to live in lower support/higher independence placements. Of surveyed placements, 35.5% provide a communal computer and 38.7% IT skills sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Community mental health rehabilitation service-users risk finding themselves excluded by a "digital divide". Action is needed to ensure equal access to online opportunities, including healthcare innovations. Clinical and policy implications are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Internet; digital divide; mental health rehabilitation; mobile phone; psychosis; technology
Authors: Ben Greer; Dan Robotham; Sara Simblett; Hannah Curtis; Helena Griffiths; Til Wykes Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-01-09 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Lucia Bonet; Blanca Llácer; Miguel Hernandez-Viadel; David Arce; Ignacio Blanquer; Carlos Cañete; Maria Escartí; Ana M González-Pinto; Julio Sanjuán Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2018-07-25