| Literature DB >> 28675137 |
Sabrina Rasheed1, Swapan Kumar Roy2, Susmita Das3, Syeda Nafisa Chowdhury4, Mohammad Iqbal3, Syeda Mahsina Akter2, Khurshid Jahan2, Shahadat Uddin5, Anne Marie Thow4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Appropriate infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices are essential for nutrition of infants and young children. Bangladesh has one of the highest levels of malnutrition globally along with sub-optimal IYCF practices. A supportive policy environment is essential to ensure that effective IYCF interventions are scaled up. The objectives of our study were to assess the support for IYCF in the national policy environment through policy analysis and stakeholder analysis and in so doing identify opportunities to strengthen the policy environment.Entities:
Keywords: Content analysis; IYCF; Policy; Stakeholder
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28675137 PMCID: PMC5496023 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4338-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Characteristics of the participants
| Group | Number | Organizations represented |
|---|---|---|
| Government | 7 | DGHS, NNS, IPHN, MoHFW, Community Clinic project |
| UN/Donor | 5 | Food and Agriculture Organization, UNICEF, World Health organization, World Food program |
| NGO/Civil society | 6 | Save the children, World vision, Plan International, TAHN Foundation, Bangladesh Breastfeeding Foundation, BRAC |
| Research and Academia | 7 | icddr,b, International Food Policy Research Institute, Home Economics College, Medical college, Institute of Child and Mother Hospital, OGSB |
| Other | 4 | Kaler Kantho, Prothom Alo, The independent, Dr. Talukdar, Dr. Samina Chowdhury |
Fig. 1a Visual representation of technical support network among stakeholders and their attributes. b Visual representation of funding support network among stakeholders and their attributes
Top ten entities based on network measures for technical support
| Rank | In-degree | Out-degree | Betweenness | Closeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NNS (36) | NNS (13) | NNS (3251.7) | NNS(0.010) |
| 2 | NWG (13) | MOHFW (10) | MOHFW (990.7) | UNICEF (0.007) |
| 3 | BBF (12) | UNICEF (10) | NWG (658.8) | MoHFW(0.007) |
| 4 | MOHFW (7) | IYCF alliance(10) | UNICEF (560.7 | BBF (0.007) |
| 5 | DGHS (6) | USAID (10) | DGHS (419.3) | DGHS (0.006) |
| 6 | DGFP (5) | DGHS (5) | BBF (311.9) | NWG (0.006) |
| 7 | BRAC (4) | DGFP (3) | IYCF alliance(297.9) | IYCF alliance(0.006) |
| 8 | A &T (4) | BRAC (3) | USAID (267.0) | DGFP (0.006) |
| 9 | CARE (3) | WHO (3) | A&T (184.1) | USAID (0.006) |
| 10 | Plan (3) | WFP (3) | BRAC (163.2) | BRAC (0.006) |
Top ten entities based on network measures for funding support
| b | In-degree | Out-degree | Betweenness | Closeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NNS (7) | USAID (11) | USAID (267.8) | NNS (0.018) |
| 2 | BBF (6) | GATES (10) | UNICEF (252.8) | USAID (0.018) |
| 3 | BRAC (4) | UNICEF (9) | GATES (203.6) | GATES (0.017) |
| 4 | WB (4) | EU/EC (3) | NNS (165.9) | WB (0.017) |
| 5 | A&T (3) | WHO (3) | BRAC (113.9) | BRAC (0.016) |
| 6 | CARE (3) | BRAC (2) | A&T (109.4) | UNICEF (0.015) |
| 7 | BKMI (2) | WB (2) | WB (93.8) | CARE (0.015) |
| 8 | FHI 360 (2) | MOHFW (2) | BBF (80.8) | BBF (0.015) |
| 9 | HKI (2) | AED (2) | CARE (62.4) | A&T (0.014) |
| 10 | NNP (2) | NNS (1) | AED (56) | EU/EC (0.013) |
Fig. 2a Visual representation of community structure for technical support network. b Visual representation of community structure for funding support network