Literature DB >> 28674947

Rectal axis and enterocele on proctogram may predict laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy outcomes for rectal intussusception.

F Ris1,2, K J Gorissen3, J Ragg3, M P Gosselink3, N C Buchs3, R Hompes3, C Cunningham3, O Jones3, A Slater4, I Lindsey3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) has become a well-established treatment for symptomatic high-grade internal rectal prolapse. The aim of this study was to identify proctographic criteria predictive of a successful outcome.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty consecutive patients were evaluated from a prospectively maintained pelvic floor database. Pre- and post-operative functional results were assessed with the Wexner constipation score (WCS) and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI). Proctogram criteria were analyzed against functional results. These included grade of intussusception, presence of enterocele, rectocele, excessive perineal descent and the orientation of the rectal axis at rest (vertical vs. horizontal).
RESULTS: Ninety-one patients completed both pre- and post-operative follow-up questionnaires. Median pre-operative WCS was 14 (range 10-17), and median FISI was 20 (range 0-61), with 28 patients (31%) having a FISI above 30. The presence of an enterocele was associated with more frequent complete resolution of obstructed defecation (70 vs. 52%, p = 0.02) and fecal incontinence symptoms (71 vs. 38%, p = 0.01) after LVMR. Patients with a more horizontal rectum at rest pre-operatively had significantly less resolution of symptoms post-operatively (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: These data show that proctographic findings can help predict functional outcomes after LVMR. Presence of an enterocele and a vertical axis of the rectum at rest may be associated with a better resolution of symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterocele; Fecal incontinence; Intussusception; Obstructed defaecation; Proctogram; Rectal prolapse; Rectocele; Rectopexy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28674947     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1643-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  23 in total

1.  Horizontal inclination of the longitudinal axis of the colonic J-pouch: defining causes of evacuation difficulty.

Authors:  J Hida; M Yasutomi; T Maruyama; T Tokoro; T Uchida; T Wakano; R Kubo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Defecographic measurements of rectal intussusception and prolapse in patients and in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  F Pomerri; M Zuliani; C Mazza; F Villarejo; A Scopece
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Lessons learned after more than 400 laparoscopic ventral rectopexies.

Authors:  B van Geluwe; A Wolthuis; F Penninckx; A D'Hoore
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.090

4.  Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.

Authors:  P J Shorvon; S McHugh; N E Diamant; S Somers; G W Stevenson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectoanal intussusception: postoperative evaluation with proctography.

Authors:  Akira Tsunoda; Tomoyuki Ohta; Yoshiyuki Kiyasu; Hiroshi Kusanagi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Sacral neuromodulation for persistent faecal incontinence after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for high-grade internal rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A Mishra; S Prapasrivorakul; M P Gosselink; K J Gorissen; R Hompes; O Jones; C Cunningham; K E Matzel; I Lindsey
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Proficiency gain curve and predictors of outcome for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.

Authors:  Hugh Mackenzie; Anthony R Dixon
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence: is the outcome compromised in patients with high-grade internal rectal prolapse?

Authors:  Siriluck Prapasrivorakul; Martijn P Gosselink; Martijn Gosselink; Kim J Gorissen; Simona Fourie; Roel Hompes; Oliver M Jones; Chris Cunningham; Ian Lindsey
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  What happens in stapled transanal rectum resection?

Authors:  Lars Boenicke; David G Jayne; Mia Kim; Joachim Reibetanz; Robert Bolte; Werner Kenn; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Christoph Isbert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  4 in total

1.  Posterior pelvic tilt is a risk factor for rectal prolapse: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  C Cantiani; D Sgamma; E Grossi; D Saccá; O R Meli; Q Lai; F Gaj
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Fine-tuning indications for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.

Authors:  A D'Hoore
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Ventral Prosthesis Rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Manatakis; Nikolaos Gouvas; George Pechlivanides; Evangelos Xynos
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-19

4.  Short term outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal and complex pelvic organ prolapse: case series.

Authors:  Fatma Ayça Gültekin
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-06-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.