Diego Cecchin1, Henryk Barthel2, Davide Poggiali3, Annachiara Cagnin3, Solveig Tiepolt2, Pietro Zucchetta4, Paolo Turco4, Paolo Gallo3, Anna Chiara Frigo5, Osama Sabri2, Franco Bui4. 1. Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. diego.cecchin@unipd.it. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. 3. Neurology, Department of Neurosciences (DNS), University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy. 4. Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. 5. Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In the initial evaluation of patients with suspected dementia and Alzheimer's disease, there is no consensus on how to perform semiquantification of amyloid in such a way that it: (1) facilitates visual qualitative interpretation, (2) takes the kinetic behaviour of the tracer into consideration particularly with regard to at least partially correcting for blood flow dependence, (3) analyses the amyloid load based on accurate parcellation of cortical and subcortical areas, (4) includes partial volume effect correction (PVEC), (5) includes MRI-derived topographical indexes, (6) enables application to PET/MRI images and PET/CT images with separately acquired MR images, and (7) allows automation. METHODS: A method with all of these characteristics was retrospectively tested in 86 subjects who underwent amyloid (18F-florbetaben) PET/MRI in a clinical setting (using images acquired 90-110 min after injection, 53 were classified visually as amyloid-negative and 33 as amyloid-positive). Early images after tracer administration were acquired between 0 and 10 min after injection, and later images were acquired between 90 and 110 min after injection. PVEC of the PET data was carried out using the geometric transfer matrix method. Parametric images and some regional output parameters, including two innovative "dual time-point" indexes, were obtained. RESULTS: Subjects classified visually as amyloid-positive showed a sparse tracer uptake in the primary sensory, motor and visual areas in accordance with the isocortical stage of the topographic distribution of the amyloid plaque (Braak stages V/VI). In patients classified visually as amyloid-negative, the method revealed detectable levels of tracer uptake in the basal portions of the frontal and temporal lobes, areas that are known to be sites of early deposition of amyloid plaques that probably represented early accumulation (Braak stage A) that is typical of normal ageing. There was a strong correlation between age and the indexes of the new dual time-point amyloid imaging method in amyloid-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: The method can be considered a valuable tool in both routine clinical practice and in the research setting as it will standardize data regarding amyloid deposition. It could potentially also be used to identify early amyloid plaque deposition in younger subjects in whom treatment could theoretically be more effective.
PURPOSE: In the initial evaluation of patients with suspected dementia and Alzheimer's disease, there is no consensus on how to perform semiquantification of amyloid in such a way that it: (1) facilitates visual qualitative interpretation, (2) takes the kinetic behaviour of the tracer into consideration particularly with regard to at least partially correcting for blood flow dependence, (3) analyses the amyloid load based on accurate parcellation of cortical and subcortical areas, (4) includes partial volume effect correction (PVEC), (5) includes MRI-derived topographical indexes, (6) enables application to PET/MRI images and PET/CT images with separately acquired MR images, and (7) allows automation. METHODS: A method with all of these characteristics was retrospectively tested in 86 subjects who underwent amyloid (18F-florbetaben) PET/MRI in a clinical setting (using images acquired 90-110 min after injection, 53 were classified visually as amyloid-negative and 33 as amyloid-positive). Early images after tracer administration were acquired between 0 and 10 min after injection, and later images were acquired between 90 and 110 min after injection. PVEC of the PET data was carried out using the geometric transfer matrix method. Parametric images and some regional output parameters, including two innovative "dual time-point" indexes, were obtained. RESULTS: Subjects classified visually as amyloid-positive showed a sparse tracer uptake in the primary sensory, motor and visual areas in accordance with the isocortical stage of the topographic distribution of the amyloid plaque (Braak stages V/VI). In patients classified visually as amyloid-negative, the method revealed detectable levels of tracer uptake in the basal portions of the frontal and temporal lobes, areas that are known to be sites of early deposition of amyloid plaques that probably represented early accumulation (Braak stage A) that is typical of normal ageing. There was a strong correlation between age and the indexes of the new dual time-point amyloid imaging method in amyloid-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: The method can be considered a valuable tool in both routine clinical practice and in the research setting as it will standardize data regarding amyloid deposition. It could potentially also be used to identify early amyloid plaque deposition in younger subjects in whom treatment could theoretically be more effective.
Authors: Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Stefan Teipel; Alexander Drzezga; Michel J Grothe; Henryk Barthel; Gaël Chételat; Norbert Schuff; Pawel Skudlarski; Enrica Cavedo; Giovanni B Frisoni; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Jochen René Thyrian; Chris Fox; Satoshi Minoshima; Osama Sabri; Andreas Fellgiebel Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Alberto Serrano-Pozo; Matthew P Frosch; Eliezer Masliah; Bradley T Hyman Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: Natalie Nelissen; Koen Van Laere; Lennart Thurfjell; Rikard Owenius; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Michel Koole; Guy Bormans; David J Brooks; Rik Vandenberghe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Walter A Rocca; David S Knopman; Michelle M Mielke; Val J Lowe; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Gregory M Preboske; Vernon S Pankratz; Prashanthi Vemuri; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Jana Thomas; Sharon Ooms; Marcel Verbeek; Jan Booij; Mark Rijpkema; Roy P C Kessels; Sebastiaan Overeem; Jurgen Claassen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 2.692