Literature DB >> 28674779

Analysis of three-dimensional endocardial and epicardial strains from cardiac magnetic resonance in healthy subjects and patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Xiaodan Zhao1, Ru San Tan1,2, Hak Chiaw Tang1, Shuang Leng1, Jun-Mei Zhang1, Liang Zhong3,4.   

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disease that leads to left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy with or without the presence of LV outflow tract obstruction. The aim of this study was to find an easy and useful indicator based on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images for control subjects and patients with and without obstruction. CMR scans were performed for 19 control subjects and 19 HCM patients. Endocardial strain was defined as [Formula: see text], with [Formula: see text] being the length of endocardium at end-diastole (end-systole); similarly for epicardial strain ([Formula: see text]). The strains were evaluated in cine CMR two-, three- and four-chamber views. Six atrioventricular junction (AVJ) points from three CMR views were semi-automatically tracked. The peak systolic velocity (Sm1), peak early diastolic velocity and late diastolic velocity (Em, Am) were extracted and analysed. Compared with control subjects, HCM patients had significantly smaller three-dimensional strains and AVJ motion incorporating measurements from three long-axis views (all P < 0.05). Moreover, ROC analysis found that three-dimensional global epicardial strain <17.2% had the best sensitivity 94.4% and specificity 94.7% to differentiate HCM from control (AUC = 0.97). Therefore, three-dimensional endocardial and epicardial strains provide an easy and effective approach to manage and triage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrioventricular junction motion; Endocardial strain; Epicardial strain; Feature tracking; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28674779     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1674-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  29 in total

1.  Updated meta-analysis of septal alcohol ablation versus myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Shikhar Agarwal; E Murat Tuzcu; Milind Y Desai; Nicholas Smedira; Harry M Lever; Bruce W Lytle; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Doppler tissue imaging for the assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: a systematic approach for the sonographer.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Hill; Richie A Palma
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  MRI of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: part I, MRI appearances.

Authors:  Mark W Hansen; Naeem Merchant
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Impact of surgical ventricular restoration on ventricular shape, wall stress, and function in heart failure patients.

Authors:  L Zhong; Y Su; L Gobeawan; S Sola; R-S Tan; J L Navia; D N Ghista; T Chua; J Guccione; G S Kassab
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Regional ejection fraction and regional area strain for left ventricular function assessment in male patients after first-time myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Soo-Kng Teo; F J A Vos; Ru-San Tan; Liang Zhong; Yi Su
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Three-Dimensional Tricuspid Annular Motion Analysis from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature-Tracking.

Authors:  Shuang Leng; Meng Jiang; Xiao-Dan Zhao; John Carson Allen; Ghassan S Kassab; Rong-Zhen Ouyang; Ju-Le Tan; Ben He; Ru-San Tan; Liang Zhong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Epidemiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-related death: revisited in a large non-referral-based patient population.

Authors:  B J Maron; I Olivotto; P Spirito; S A Casey; P Bellone; T E Gohman; K J Graham; D A Burton; F Cecchi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Automated quantitative assessment of cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived atrioventricular junction velocities.

Authors:  Shuang Leng; Xiao-Dan Zhao; Fei-Qiong Huang; Jia-Ing Wong; Bo-Yang Su; John Carson Allen; Ghassan S Kassab; Ru-San Tan; Liang Zhong
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 9.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Perry Elliott; William J McKenna
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-05       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a large community-based population: clinical outcome and identification of risk factors for sudden cardiac death and clinical deterioration.

Authors:  Marcel J M Kofflard; Folkert J Ten Cate; Chris van der Lee; Ron T van Domburg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  4 in total

1.  3-Dimensional regional and global strain abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Alessandro Satriano; Bobak Heydari; Namrata Guron; Kate Fenwick; Matthew Cheung; Yoko Mikami; Naeem Merchant; Carmen P Lydell; Andrew G Howarth; Nowell M Fine; James A White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Real-world clinical validity of cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking in primitive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Palumbo; Francesco Masedu; Camilla De Cataldo; Ester Cannizzaro; Federico Bruno; Silvia Pradella; Francesco Arrigoni; Marco Valenti; Alessandra Splendiani; Antonio Barile; Andrea Giovagnoni; Carlo Masciocchi; Ernesto Di Cesare
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Normal Values of Myocardial Deformation Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in a Healthy Chinese Population: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Junping Peng; Xiaodan Zhao; Lei Zhao; Zhanming Fan; Zheng Wang; Hui Chen; Shuang Leng; John Allen; Ru-San Tan; Angela S Koh; Xiaohai Ma; Mingwu Lou; Liang Zhong
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Left Ventricular Wall Stress Is Sensitive Marker of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Xiaodan Zhao; Ru-San Tan; Hak-Chiaw Tang; Soo-Kng Teo; Yi Su; Min Wan; Shuang Leng; Jun-Mei Zhang; John Allen; Ghassan S Kassab; Liang Zhong
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.