Literature DB >> 28674740

Changes in gait pattern and early functional results after ACL repair are comparable to those of ACL reconstruction.

Benedikt Schliemann1, Johannes Glasbrenner2, Dieter Rosenbaum3, Katharina Lammers2, Mirco Herbort2, Christoph Domnick2, Michael J Raschke2, Clemens Kösters2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) has been introduced as a new technique to repair the torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and to restore knee joint kinematics after an acute ACL tear. Aim of the present study was to compare the early post-operative activity, restoration of gait pattern and functional results after DIS in comparison with primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) for acute ACL tears. It was hypothesized that functional results, post-operative activity and changes in gait pattern after DIS are comparable to those after ACLR.
METHODS: Sixty patients with acute ACL tears were included in this study and underwent either DIS or ACLR with an anatomic semitendinosus autograft in a randomized manner. Patients were equipped with an accelerometric step counter for the first 6 weeks after surgery in order to monitor their early post-operative activity. 3D gait analysis was performed at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Temporal-spatial, kinematic and kinetic parameters were extracted and averaged for each subject. Functional results were recorded at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after surgery using the Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score and Lysholm score.
RESULTS: Patients who underwent DIS showed an increased early post-operative activity with significant differences at week 2 and 3 (p = 0.0241 and 0.0220). No significant differences between groups were found for knee kinematic and kinetic parameters or the functional scores at any time of the follow-up. Furthermore, the difference in anterior tibial translation was not significantly different between the two groups (n.s.).
CONCLUSION: Early functional results and changes in gait pattern after DIS are comparable to those of primary ACLR. Therefore, ACL repair may be an alternative to ACLR in this cohort of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; ACL repair; ACL tear; Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization; Gait analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28674740     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4618-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  Augmented repair and early mobilization of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  H H Paessler; J Deneke; L E Dahners
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation.

Authors:  William T Wilson; Graeme P Hopper; Paul A Byrne; Gordon M MacKay
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2016-10-26

3.  The anterior cruciate ligament: a technique of repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  J L Marshall; R F Warren; T L Wickiewicz; B Reider
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The reliability and diagnostic accuracy of assessing the translation endpoint during the lachman test.

Authors:  Edward P Mulligan; Daniel Q McGuffie; Katherine Coyner; Michael Khazzam
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-02

5.  Gait patterns after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are related to graft type.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Joanne E Wittwer; Jason O'Brien; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Alterations in joint kinematics during walking following hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel Andernord; Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Mattias Ylander; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  [Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in single bundle technique].

Authors:  W Petersen; P Forkel; A Achtnich; S Metzlaff; T Zantop
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Survival of the anterior cruciate ligament graft and the contralateral ACL at a minimum of 15 years.

Authors:  Henry E Bourke; Lucy J Salmon; Alison Waller; Victoria Patterson; Leo A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: novel technique for preserving the ruptured ACL.

Authors:  S Eggli; H Kohlhof; M Zumstein; P Henle; M Hartel; D S Evangelopoulos; H Bonel; S Kohl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  14 in total

1.  Surgeon experience with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization does not influence risk of failure.

Authors:  Philipp Henle; Kathrin S Bieri; Janosch Haeberli; Nele Arnout; Jan Victor; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Koesters; Stefan Eggli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Dynamic augmentation restores anterior tibial translation in ACL suture repair: a biomechanical comparison of non-, static and dynamic augmentation techniques.

Authors:  Roy A G Hoogeslag; Reinoud W Brouwer; Rianne Huis In 't Veld; Joanna M Stephen; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  ACL suturing using dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation showing good clinical outcome but a high reoperation rate: a retrospective independent study.

Authors:  Martin Meister; Jonathan Koch; Felix Amsler; Markus P Arnold; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  High complication rate following dynamic intraligamentary stabilization for primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Michael Osti; Rene El Attal; Wolfgang Doskar; Paul Höck; Vinzenz Smekal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Review of Recent Literature (2016-2017).

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-05

6.  Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair.

Authors:  B Schliemann; C Kösters; J Glasbrenner; M Fischer; M J Raschke; T Briese; M Müller; E Herbst; C Kittl
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears seems safe but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harmen D Vermeijden; Inger N Sierevelt; Gregory S DiFelice; Arthur van Noort; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Long Pang; Pengcheng Li; Tao Li; Yinghao Li; Jing Zhu; Xin Tang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 9.  Anterior cruciate ligament repair - past, present and future.

Authors:  Piyush Mahapatra; Saman Horriat; Bobby S Anand
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-06-15

10.  RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional-biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls-experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study.

Authors:  Sebastian Müller; Linda Bühl; Corina Nüesch; Geert Pagenstert; Annegret Mündermann; Christian Egloff
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.