Literature DB >> 28673033

Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for comprehensive assessment of 16S rRNA bacterial diversity in marine biofilms using high-throughput sequencing.

Natàlia Corcoll1, Tobias Österlund2, Lucas Sinclair3, Alexander Eiler3, Erik Kristiansson2, Thomas Backhaus1, K Martin Eriksson4.   

Abstract

High-throughput DNA sequencing technologies are increasingly used for the metagenomic characterisation of microbial biodiversity. However, basic issues, such as the choice of an appropriate DNA extraction method, are still not resolved for non-model microbial communities. This study evaluates four commonly used DNA extraction methods for marine periphyton biofilms in terms of DNA yield, efficiency, purity, integrity and resulting 16S rRNA bacterial diversity. Among the tested methods, the Plant DNAzol® Reagent (PlantDNAzol) and the FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (FastDNA Soil) methods were best suited to extract high quantities of DNA (77-130 μg g wet wt-1). Lower amounts of DNA were obtained (<37 μg g wet wt-1) with the Power Plant® Pro DNA Isolation Kit (PowerPlant) and the Power Biofilm® DNA Isolation Kit (PowerBiofilm) methods, but integrity and purity of the extracted DNA were higher. Results from 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing demonstrate that the choice of a DNA extraction method significantly influences the bacterial community profiles generated. A higher number of bacterial OTUs were detected when DNA was extracted with the PowerBiofilm and the PlantDNAzol methods. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential bias in metagenomic diversity estimates associated with different DNA extraction methods. © FEMS 2017. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S amplicon sequencing; DNA; bacteria; biofilms; extraction methods; metagenomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28673033     DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnx139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.742


  10 in total

1.  Potential use of high-throughput sequencing of bacterial communities for postmortem submersion interval estimation.

Authors:  Jing He; Juanjuan Guo; Xiaoliang Fu; Jifeng Cai
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Linn Sgier; Stephanie N Merbt; Ahmed Tlili; Alexandra Kroll; Anze Zupanic
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  Community profiling of the urinary microbiota: considerations for low-biomass samples.

Authors:  Lisa Karstens; Mark Asquith; Vincent Caruso; James T Rosenbaum; Damien A Fair; Jonathan Braun; W Thomas Gregory; Rahel Nardos; Shannon K McWeeney
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Microbiome of the freshwater sponge Ephydatia muelleri shares compositional and functional similarities with those of marine sponges.

Authors:  Scott Sugden; Johannes Holert; Erick Cardenas; William W Mohn; Lisa Y Stein
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 11.217

5.  Highly Reproducible 16S Sequencing Facilitates Measurement of Host Genetic Influences on the Stickleback Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Clayton M Small; Mark Currey; Emily A Beck; Susan Bassham; William A Cresko
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 6.496

6.  Utilizing field collected insects for next generation sequencing: Effects of sampling, storage, and DNA extraction methods.

Authors:  Kimberly M Ballare; Nathaniel S Pope; Antonio R Castilla; Sarah Cusser; Richard P Metz; Shalene Jha
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Development of a robust protocol for the characterization of the pulmonary microbiota.

Authors:  Nathan Dumont-Leblond; Marc Veillette; Christine Racine; Philippe Joubert; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-02-05

8.  Elucidating biofilm diversity on water lily leaves through 16S rRNA amplicon analysis: Comparison of four DNA extraction kits.

Authors:  Kathrin Janssen; Shook Ling Low; Yan Wang; Qi-Yong Mu; Gabriele Bierbaum; Carole T Gee
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 1.936

9.  Developing whole cell standards for the microbiome field.

Authors:  Chrysi Sergaki; Saba Anwar; Martin Fritzsche; Ryan Mate; Robert J Francis; Kirsty MacLellan-Gibson; Alastair Logan; Gregory C A Amos
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 16.837

10.  Optimum DNA Extraction Methods for Edible Bird's Nest Identification Using Simple Additive Weighting Technique.

Authors:  Meei Chien Quek; Nyuk Ling Chin; Sheau Wei Tan
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.