Literature DB >> 28671972

DiapHRaGM: A mnemonic to describe the work of breathing in patients with respiratory failure.

Aiman Tulaimat1, William E Trick2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The assessment of the work of breathing in the definitions of respiratory failure is vague and variable.
OBJECTIVE: Identify a parsimonious set of signs to describe the work of breathing in hypoxemic, acutely ill patients.
METHODS: We examined consecutive medical ICU patients receiving oxygen with a mask, non-invasive ventilation, or T-piece. A physician inspected each patient for 10 seconds, rated the level of respiratory distress, and then examined the patient for vital signs and 17 other physical signs. We used the rating of distress as a surrogate for measuring the work of breathing, constructed three multivariate models to identify the one with the smallest number of signs and largest explained variance, and validated it with bootstrap analysis.
RESULTS: We performed 402 observations on 240 patients. Respiratory distress was absent in 78, mild in 157, moderate in 107, and severe in 60. Respiratory rate, hypoxia, heart rate, and frequency of most signs increased as distress increased. Respiratory rate and hypoxia explained 43% of the variance in respiratory distress. Diaphoresis, gasping, and contraction of the sternomastoid explained an additional 28%. Heart rate, blood pressure, alertness, agitation, body posture, nasal flaring, audible breathing, cyanosis, tracheal tug, retractions, paradox, scalene or abdominal muscles contraction did not increase the explained variance in respiratory distress.
CONCLUSION: Most of the variance is respiratory distress can be explained by five signs summarized by the mnemonic DiapHRaGM (diaphoresis, hypoxia, respiratory rate, gasping, accessory muscle). This set of signs may allow for efficient, standardized assessments of the work of breathing of hypoxic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28671972      PMCID: PMC5495207          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  43 in total

1.  A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise.

Authors:  S Grant; T Aitchison; E Henderson; J Christie; S Zare; J McMurray; H Dargie
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  At the Critical Time of Deciding on Extubation, It Is Too Late to Assess Patient Breathlessness.

Authors:  Arnaud W Thille; Florence Boissier
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS.

Authors:  Todd W Rice; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; Douglas L Hayden; David A Schoenfeld; Lorraine B Ware
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Facial signs of respiratory distress after cardiac surgery. A plea for the clinical approach to mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  A Gilston
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation vs Oxygen Therapy on Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Virginie Lemiale; Djamel Mokart; Matthieu Resche-Rigon; Frédéric Pène; Julien Mayaux; Etienne Faucher; Martine Nyunga; Christophe Girault; Pierre Perez; Christophe Guitton; Kenneth Ekpe; Achille Kouatchet; Igor Théodose; Dominique Benoit; Emmanuel Canet; François Barbier; Antoine Rabbat; Fabrice Bruneel; Francois Vincent; Kada Klouche; Kontar Loay; Eric Mariotte; Lila Bouadma; Anne-Sophie Moreau; Amélie Seguin; Anne-Pascale Meert; Jean Reignier; Laurent Papazian; Ilham Mehzari; Yves Cohen; Maleka Schenck; Rebecca Hamidfar; Michael Darmon; Alexandre Demoule; Sylvie Chevret; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Ventilatory failure, ventilator support, and ventilator weaning.

Authors:  Martin J Tobin; Franco Laghi; Amal Jubran
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 9.090

7.  Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in acute respiratory distress without prior chronic respiratory failure.

Authors:  W Patrick; K Webster; L Ludwig; D Roberts; P Wiebe; M Younes
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Underestimation of Patient Breathlessness by Nurses and Physicians during a Spontaneous Breathing Trial.

Authors:  Hege S Haugdahl; Sissel L Storli; Barbro Meland; Knut Dybwik; Ulla Romild; Pål Klepstad
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Position and diaphoresis in acute asthma.

Authors:  B E Brenner; E Abraham; R R Simon
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

Authors:  V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Multimode optical fiber specklegram smart bed sensor array.

Authors:  Stephen C Warren-Smith; Adam D Kilpatrick; Kabish Wisal; Linh V Nguyen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.758

2.  Development of a Medium Care Unit Using an Inexperienced Respiratory Staff: Lessons Learned during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Olivier Van Hove; Alexis Gillet; Jérôme Tack; Gregory Reychler; Magda Guatteri; Asuncion Ballarin; Justine Thomas; Rolando Espinoza; Frédéric Bonnier; Michelle Norrenberg; Pauline Daniel; Michel Toussaint; Dimitri Leduc; Bruno Bonnechère; Olivier Taton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.