Literature DB >> 28671898

Patterns and Outcomes Associated With Timeliness of Initial Crystalloid Resuscitation in a Prospective Sepsis and Septic Shock Cohort.

Daniel E Leisman1, Chananya Goldman, Martin E Doerfler, Kevin D Masick, Susan Dries, Eric Hamilton, Mangala Narasimhan, Gulrukh Zaidi, Jason A D'Amore, John K D'Angelo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to 1) assess patterns of early crystalloid resuscitation provided to sepsis and septic shock patients at initial presentation and 2) determine the association between time to initial crystalloid resuscitation with hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation, ICU utilization, and length of stay.
DESIGN: Consecutive-sample observational cohort.
SETTING: Nine tertiary and community hospitals over 1.5 years. PATIENTS: Adult sepsis and septic shock patients captured in a prospective quality improvement database inclusion criteria: suspected or confirmed infection, greater than or equal to two systemic inflammatory response criteria, greater than or equal to one organ-dysfunction criteria.
INTERVENTIONS: The primary exposure was crystalloid initiation within 30 minutes or lesser, 31-120 minutes, or more than 120 minutes from sepsis identification.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 11,182 patients. Crystalloid initiation was faster for emergency department patients (β, -141 min; CI, -159 to -125; p < 0.001), baseline hypotension (β, -39 min; CI, -48 to -32; p < 0.001), fever, urinary or skin/soft-tissue source of infection. Initiation was slower with heart failure (β, 20 min; CI, 14-25; p < 0.001), and renal failure (β, 16 min; CI, 10-22; p < 0.001). Five thousand three hundred thirty-six patients (48%) had crystalloid initiated in 30 minutes or lesser versus 2,388 (21%) in 31-120 minutes, and 3,458 (31%) in more than 120 minutes. The patients receiving fluids within 30 minutes had lowest mortality (949 [17.8%]) versus 31-120 minutes (446 [18.7%]) and more than 120 minutes (846 [24.5%]). Compared with more than 120 minutes, the adjusted odds ratio for mortality was 0.76 (CI, 0.64-0.90; p = 0.002) for 30 minutes or lesser and 0.76 (CI, 0.62-0.92; p = 0.004) for 31-120 minutes. When assessed continuously, mortality odds increased by 1.09 with each hour to initiation (CI, 1.03-1.16; p = 0.002). We observed similar patterns for mechanical ventilation, ICU utilization, and length of stay. We did not observe significant interaction for mortality risk between initiation time and baseline heart failure, renal failure, hypotension, acute kidney injury, altered gas exchange, or emergency department (vs inpatient) presentation.
CONCLUSIONS: Crystalloid was initiated significantly later with comorbid heart failure and renal failure, with absence of fever or hypotension, and in inpatient-presenting sepsis. Earlier crystalloid initiation was associated with decreased mortality. Comorbidities and severity did not modify this effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28671898     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  22 in total

Review 1.  The surviving sepsis campaign: fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy research priorities in adult patients.

Authors:  Ishaq Lat; Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-03-01

2.  Getting to the Heart of the Matter: What We Know About Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Heart Failure Patients.

Authors:  Timothy W Jones; Sydney Finder; Andrea Sikora Newsome; Susan E Smith
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Evaluation and Predictors of Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Authors:  Hani I Kuttab; Joseph D Lykins; Michelle D Hughes; Kristen Wroblewski; Eric P Keast; Omobolawa Kukoyi; Jason A Kopec; Stephen Hall; Michael A Ward
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Sepsis in a Panorama: What the Cardiovascular Physician Should Know.

Authors:  Deepa B Gotur
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

5.  Sepsis Presenting in Hospitals versus Emergency Departments: Demographic, Resuscitation, and Outcome Patterns in a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort.

Authors:  Daniel E Leisman; Catalina Angel; Sandra M Schneider; Jason A D'Amore; John K D'Angelo; Martin E Doerfler
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 6.  Skin and sepsis: contribution of dermatology to a rapid diagnosis.

Authors:  A Pulido-Pérez; E Bouza; M Bergón-Sendín; R Suárez-Fernández; P Muñoz-Martín
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Normal saline versus Normosol™-R in sepsis resuscitation: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ryan A Duffy; Mathab B Foroozesh; Robert D Loflin; Susanti R Ie; Bradley L Icard; Allison N Tegge; Jonathan R Nogueira; Damon R Kuehl; Dan C Smith; Anthony L Loschner
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2018-07-05

8.  Influencing outcomes with automated time zero for sepsis through statistical validation and process improvement.

Authors:  Karen Jiggins Colorafi; Ken Ferrell; Alyson D'Andrea; Joseph Colorafi
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2019-09-17

9.  The Effect of Body Mass Index and Weight-Adjusted Fluid Dosing on Mortality in Sepsis.

Authors:  Michael A Ward; Hani I Kuttab; Joseph D Lykins V; Kristen Wroblewski; Michelle D Hughes; Eric P Keast; Jason A Kopec; Erron M Rourke; John Purakal
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.510

10.  Predicting mortality among septic patients presenting to the emergency department-a cross sectional analysis using machine learning.

Authors:  Adam Karlsson; Willem Stassen; Amy Loutfi; Ulrika Wallgren; Eric Larsson; Lisa Kurland
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.