Literature DB >> 28671881

Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Fusion or Decompression Alone Results in Similar Rates of Reoperation at 5 Years.

John S Vorhies1, Tina Hernandez-Boussard2, Todd Alamin1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Population-based analysis of administrative discharge records from California, Florida, and New York inpatient, ambulatory, and emergency department settings between 2005 and 2011, utilizing Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare, and characterize rates of reoperation and readmission among patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with surgical decompression alone versus fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis can be treated by decompression with or without fusion. Fusion has traditionally been preferred. We hypothesized that rates of reoperation after decompression alone would be higher than after fusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a population-based analysis of administrative discharge records from California, Florida, and New York inpatient, ambulatory, and emergency department settings between 2005 and 2011, with Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data. We identified all patients who had degenerative spondylolisthesis who were treated with decompression alone or with fusion and compared their rates of reoperation at 1, 3, and 5 years from the index operation. We used descriptive statistics and a hierarchical logistic regression model to generate risk-adjusted odds of all-cause readmissions.
RESULTS: Our study consisted of 75,024 patients with spondylolisthesis; 6712 (8.95%) of them underwent decompression alone and 68,312 (91.05%) of them underwent fusion. Rates of reoperation were higher for decompression versus fusion at 1 year; 6.87% versus 5.53% (P≤0.001), but at 3 years; 13.86% versus 12.91% (P=0.18) and 5 years; 16.9% versus 17.7% (P=0.398) years rates of reoperation were not statistically different. Patients treated with decompression alone that had a second operation tended to have the operation sooner 512.6 versus 567.4 days (P=0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with fusion or decompression alone results in similar rates of reoperation at 5 years. This medium term data indicate that decompression alone may be a viable treatment for some patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28671881     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  6 in total

1.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Decompression Alone Compared to Decompression With Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.

Authors:  Raymond Pranata; Michael Anthonius Lim; Rachel Vania; Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-02

3.  Leveraging Digital Data to Inform and Improve Quality Cancer Care.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Douglas W Blayney; James D Brooks
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Geriatric Patients with Central Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Novel Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Xiao-Kang Cheng; Bin Chen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Decompression alone or decompression and fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Fei-Long Wei; Cheng-Pei Zhou; Quan-You Gao; Ming-Rui Du; Hao-Ran Gao; Kai-Long Zhu; Tian Li; Ji-Xian Qian; Xiao-Dong Yan
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-07-16

Review 6.  Intervertebral Disc Diseases PART 2: A Review of the Current Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Intervertebral Disc Disease.

Authors:  Pang Hung Wu; Hyeun Sung Kim; Il-Tae Jang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.