| Literature DB >> 28670634 |
Renay Ngobeni1, Amidou Samie1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Toxoplasma gondii is a zoonotic parasite that has arisen as an important opportunistic infection that causes morbidity and mortality especially in HIV positive patients. This study was carried out to determine the sero-prevalence of T. gondii (IgG and IgM) and the associated risk factors among HIV positive and negative patients in Northern South Africa.Entities:
Keywords: ELISA; HIV; Opportunistic infections; Sero-prevalence; Toxoplasma gondii
Year: 2017 PMID: 28670634 PMCID: PMC5476807 DOI: 10.21010/ajid.v11i2.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Infect Dis ISSN: 2006-0165
Demographic characteristics of the study population
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV status | HIV negative | 43 | 26.7 |
| HIV positive | 118 | 73.3 | |
| Hospital | Donald Fraser | 66 | 41.0 |
| Elim | 12 | 7.5 | |
| LTT | 15 | 9.3 | |
| Tshilidzini | 25 | 15.5 | |
| Univen | 43 | 26.7 | |
| Age group | Less than 25 years | 39 | 26.5 |
| 25 years- 45 years | 65 | 44.2 | |
| Above 45 years | 43 | 29.3 | |
| Gender | Male | 54 | 36.0 |
| Female | 96 | 64.0 | |
| Marital Status | Single | 81 | 54.0 |
| Married | 49 | 32.7 | |
| Divorced | 8 | 5.3 | |
The occurrence of T. gondii IgG in patients in relation to HIV status, place of infection, hospitals, age, gender and marital status of the patients.
| Variables | Characteristics | Toxo IgG Positive | Total | Statistics (χ2, p) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIV status | HIV negative | 7 (16.7%) | 42 | χ2=6.218, p=0.013 |
| HIV positive | 38 (38%) | 100 | ||
| Hospital | Donald Fraser | 22(40.0%) | 55 | χ2= 8.963, p=0.062 |
| Elim | 6 (54.5%) | 11 | ||
| LTT | 4 (26.7%) | 15 | ||
| Tshilidzini | 6 (31.6%) | 19 | ||
| Univen | 7 (16.7%) | 42 | ||
| Agegroup3 | 25 or less | 6 (16.2%) | 37 | χ2=7.425, p=0.024 |
| 25- 45 | 20 (35.1%) | 57 | ||
| Above 45 | 16 (45.7%) | 35 | ||
| Gender | Male | 14 (29.8%) | 47 | χ2=0.258, p=0.611 |
| Female | 29 (34.1%) | 85 | ||
| Marital status | Single | 21 (28.8%) | 73 | χ2=1.258, p= 0.739 |
| Married | 15 (35.7%) | 42 | ||
| Divorced | 3 (42.9%) | 7 | ||
| Widowed | 4 (40.0%) | 10 | ||
| Infected in Vhembe | NO | 3 (27.3%) | 11 | χ2=0.871, p=0.351 |
| YES | 34(42.0%) | 81 | ||
| Year of recruitment | 2010 | 36 (43.6%) | 104 | χ2=1.536, p= 0.215 |
| 2011 | 9 (23.7%) | 38 | ||
| WAZ less than -2 | Not underweight | 36 (30.5%) | 118 | χ2=2.154, p=0.142 |
| Underweight | 4(57.1%) | 7 | ||
| Prophylaxis | NO | 23 (38.3%) | 60 | χ2=0.149, p=0.700 |
| YES | 14 (42.4%) | 33 |
The occurrence of T. gondii IgG in HIV positive patients in relation to ARV treatment and the CD4 status of the patients
| Variables | Characteristics | Toxo IgG Positive | Total | Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARV | NO | 18(46.2%) | 39 | χ2=1.137, p= 0.286 |
| YES | 19 (35.2%) | 54 | ||
| Have you stopped | NO | 6 (33.3%) | 18 | |
| YES | 2(100.0%) | 2 | ||
| CD4 less than 50 | NO | 29 (39.7%) | 73 | χ2=0.007, p=0.932 |
| YES | 5 (38.5%) | 13 | ||
| CD4 count Less Than 200 | NO | 16 (37.2%) | 43 | χ2=0.195, p=0.659 |
| YES | 18 (41.9%) | 43 | ||
| CD4 count more than 300 | NO | 25 (41.7%) | 60 | χ2= 0.377, p=0.539 |
| YES | 9 (34.6%) | 26 | ||
| Viral load range | Low | 4(14.8%) | 27 | χ2=7.770, p=0.005 |
| High | 7 (58.3%) | 12 | ||
| Bactrim | NO | 28 (38.9%) | 72 | χ2= 0.107, P=0.744 |
| YES | 9 (42.9%) | 21 | ||
| Zidovudine | NO | 17(34.7%) | 49 | χ2= 0.056, P=0.813 |
| YES | 2(40.0%) | 5 | ||
| Efavirenz | NO | 4 (33.3%) | 12 | χ2= 0.023, P=0.870 |
| YES | 15 (35.7%) | 42 | ||
| Lamivudine | NO | 0 (0.0 | 1 | χ2= 0.553, P=0.457 |
| YES | 19(35.8%) | 53 | ||
| Tenofovir | NO | 14 (37.8%) | 37 | χ2=0.363, P=0.547 |
| YES | 5 (29.4%) | 17 | ||
| Nevirapine | NO | 15 (33.3%) | 45 | χ2= 0.406, P=0.524 |
| YES | 4(44.4%) | 9 | ||
| Stavudine | NO | 7 (31.8%) | 22 | χ2=0.185, P=0.667 |
| YES | 12 (37.5%) | 32 |
The prevalence of T. gondii IgG in patients who kept animals in the house
| Variables | Characteristics | Toxo IgG Positive | Total | Statistics (x2, p) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animals in house | NO | 39 (34.5%) | 113 | χ2=0.920, p=0.337 |
| YES | 5 (23.8%) | 21 | ||
| Chicken | NO | 41(33.1%) | 124 | χ2=0.538, p=0.463 |
| YES | 3 (23.1%) | 13 | ||
| Cattle | NO | 43 (32.3%) | 133 | χ2=0.096, p=0.757 |
| YES | 1 (25.0%) | 4 | ||
| Dogs | NO | 42 (31.8%) | 132 | χ2=0.148, p=0.701 |
| YES | 2 (40.0%) | 5 | ||
| Cats | NO | 44 (32.4%) | 13 | χ2=0.477, p=0.490 |
| YES | 38(23.4%) | 13 | ||
| Goats | NO | 43 (32.3%) | 133 | χ2=0.096, p=0.757 |
| YES | 1(25.0%) | 4 |
The occurrence of T. gondii IgG in relation to the different water sources used
| Variables | Characteristics | Toxo IgG Positive | Total | Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water source | Communal tap | 31 (30.7%) | 101 | χ2=1.159, p=0.763 |
| Tap in the house | 9(39.1%) | 23 | ||
| River/Spring | 2 (50.0%) | 4 | ||
| Borehole | 2 (33.3%) | 6 | ||
| Water storage | Two days or less | 27 (31.0%) | 87 | χ2=0.30, p=0.866 |
| 3 to 5 days | 7 (36.8%) | 19 | ||
| More than 5 days | 9 (34.6%) | 26 | ||
| Treated Source | NO | 4 (40.0%) | 10 | χ2=0.251, p=0.616 |
| YES | 40 (32.3%) | 124 | ||
| Do you treat water | YES | 42 (32.1%) | 131 | χ2=1.593, p=0.207 |
| NO | 2 (66.7%) | 3 |
The occurrence of T. gondii IgM in HIV patients from different hospitals, place of infection, age groups, gender and marital status of patients.
| Variables | Characteristics | Toxo IgM Positive | Total | Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIV status | Negative | 3 (7.1%) | 42 | χ2=0.668, p=0.414 |
| Positive | 4 (3.9%) | 102 | ||
| Hospital | Donald Fraser | 3 (5.8%) | 52 | χ2=2.460, p=0.652 |
| Elim | 0 (0.0%) | 10 | ||
| LTT | 1(6.7%) | 15 | ||
| Tshilidzini | 0(0.0%) | 25 | ||
| Univen | 3 (7.1%) | 42 | ||
| Age group | 25 or less | 3 (7.9%) | 38 | χ2=1.398, p=0.497 |
| 25-45 | 2 (3.6%) | 55 | ||
| Above 45 | 1 (2.6%) | 38 | ||
| Gender | Male | 4 (8.0%) | 50 | χ2=2.314, p=0.128 |
| Female | 2 (2.4%) | 84 | ||
| Marital status | Single | 3 (4.0%) | 75 | χ2= 1.674, p= 0.643 |
| Married | 2(4.8%) | 42 | ||
| Divorced | 1 (12.5%) | 8 | ||
| Widowed | 0 (0.0%) | 9 | ||
| Infected in Vhembe | NO | 1 (11.1%) | 9 | χ2= 1.985, p= 0.159 |
| YES | 2 (2.4%) | 84 | ||
| Year of recruitment | 2010 | 5 (4.9%) | 103 | χ2= 0.000, p= 0.995 |
| 2011 | 2 (4.9%) | 41 | ||
| WAZ-2 | Not underweight | 5(4.1%) | 121 | χ2= 1.185, p= 0.276 |
| Under weight | 1 (12.5%) | 8 | ||
| Prophylaxis | NO | 3 (4.8%) | 62 | χ2= 1.599, p=0.206 |
| YES | 0 (0.0%) | 32 |
The prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii (IgM) in HIV patients taking different ARV’s and the CD4 status the patients.
| Variables | Characteristics | Toxo IgM Positive | Total | Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARV | NO | 1 (2.3%) | 44 | χ2=0.226, p=0.635 |
| YES | 2 (4.0%) | 50 | ||
| Zidovudine | NO | 1 (2.2%) | 45 | χ2=2.932, p=0.087 |
| YES | 1 (16.7%) | 6 | ||
| Efavirenz | NO | 1 (7.7%) | 13 | χ2=0.658, p=0.417 |
| YES | 1 (2.6%) | 38 | ||
| Lamivudine | NO | 0(0.0%) | 2 | χ2=0.085, p=0.771 |
| YES | 2 (4.1%) | 49 | ||
| Tenofovir | NO | 2(6.7%) | 30 | χ2=1.457, p=0.227 |
| YES | 0 (0.0%) | 21 | ||
| Nevirapine | NO | 1 (2.4%) | 42 | χ2=1.499, p=0.221 |
| YES | 1 (11.1%) | 9 | ||
| Alternative medicine | NO | 3 (3.3%) | 91 | χ2= 0.102, p=0.749 |
| YES | 0 (0.0%) | 3 | ||
| Bactrim | NO | 3 (4.0%) | 75 | χ2=0.785, p=0.376 |
| YES | 0 (0.0%) | 19 | ||
| Diarrhea at ARV start | NO | 2 (4.1%) | 49 | χ2=0.127, p=0.721 |
| YES | 0 (0.0%) | 3 | ||
| CD4 less than 50 | NO | 1 (1.4%) | 72 | χ2=1.708, p=0.191 |
| YES | 1 (7.1%) | 14 | ||
| CD4 count Less Than 200 | NO | 1 (2.3%) | 43 | χ2=0.000, p=1.000 |
| YES | 1 (2.3%) | 43 | ||
| CD4 More than 300 | NO | 1 (1.7%) | 58 | χ2=0.284, p=0.594 |
| YES | 1(3.6%) | 28 |
The prevalence of T. gondii IgM in patients who keep animals in their houses
| Variables | Characteristics | Toxo IgM Positive | Total | Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animals in house | NO | 5 (4.4%) | 114 | χ2= 0.001, p=0.973 |
| YES | 1(4.5%) | 22 | ||
| Chicken | NO | 6 (4.8%) | 125 | χ2= 0.205, p=0.651 |
| YES | 1(7.7%) | 13 | ||
| Cattle | NO | 6(4.5%) | 133 | χ2=2.401, p= 0.121 |
| YES | 1(20.0%) | 5 | ||
| Dogs | NO | 6 (4.6%) | 131 | χ2=1.300, p=0.254 |
| YES | 1 (14.3%) | 7 | ||
| Cats | NO | 7(5.1%) | 138 | |
| YES | 0 | 0 | ||
| Goats | NO | 6 (4.5%) | 134 | χ2=3.397, p=0.065 |
| YES | 1 (25.0%) | 4 |
The prevalence of T. gondii in relation to water source and the quality of water.
| Variables | Characteristics | Toxo IgM Positive | Total | Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water source | Communal tap | 5(4.9%) | 102 | χ2=7.439, p=0.311 |
| Tap in the house | 0 (0.0%) | 25 | ||
| River/Spring | 1 (33.3%) | 3 | ||
| Borehole | 0(0.0%) | 6 | ||
| Treated Source | NO | 1(11.1%) | 9 | χ2=1.026, p=0.311 |
| YES | 5 (3.9%) | 127 | ||
| Do you treat water | NO | 6 (4.5%) | 134 | χ2=0.094, p=0.760 |
| YES | 0 (0.0%) | 2 | ||
| Water storage | Two days or less | 4 (4.7%) | 85 | χ2=0.029, p=0.986 |
| 3 to 5 days | 1 (4.2%) | 24 | ||
| More than 5 days | 1 (4.0%) | 25 |