Literature DB >> 28670010

Systems science for universal health coverage.

Timothy G Evans1, Marie Paule Kieny2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28670010      PMCID: PMC5487979          DOI: 10.2471/BLT.17.192542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


× No keyword cloud information.
It is 20 years since an international consultation in Lejondal, Sweden, highlighted the need for more and better research “to understand and improve how societies organize themselves in achieving collective health goals, and how different actors interact in the policy and implementation processes to contribute to policy outcomes.” One outcome was the creation of the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. There have since been several important milestones on the path towards more and better health systems research. The Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research found its home at the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1998 and subsequently issued a series of reports on health systems., Health systems research entered the mainstream of global health policy – not only at WHO and the World Bank, but also with the founding of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, in 2000, and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria in 2002. Ministerial meetings on health research, in 2004 and 2008, increased the demand for – and the national priority given to – such research. In 2010, a biennial global symposium on health systems research was initiated and this development led to the first global society of health systems researchers: Health Systems Global. More recent efforts in low- and middle-income countries – e.g. the establishment of a knowledge platform in India – are indicative of a shift towards systems thinking at national level. Such encouraging developments need to be carefully balanced against areas where progress has not met expectations. The development of national capacity for financing and institutional leadership of health policy and systems research has been slow. Such research also remains constrained by several common challenges – e.g. the complexity of health systems, the context specificity of research findings and the large numbers of disciplines and epistemological perspectives involved. Looking forward, however, we see a brighter future for health policy and systems research. Sustainable development goal (SDG) 3 – particularly its target of universal health coverage – has promoted the establishment of common performance metrics against which the relative effectiveness of alternative policies and programmes can be compared. There is a growing global interdependence in health – as reflected by infectious diseases such as the Ebola virus – that requires systems’ knowledge and public health investments in global readiness. The rapid growth seen in the health sector is raising systems-wide demand for knowledge and innovation to improve value for money and overcome inefficiencies related to high prices, lack of equity and poor quality. Finally, the paradigm shift towards patients being recognized as the co-designers and co-creators of their own health and health care is raising the demand for evidence that would make it possible to navigate the promises and perils of accountable care, personalized medicine and big data. How can health policy and systems research seize this favourable context and contribute more effectively to universal health coverage, greater health security, improved value in health and effective engagement of citizens? First, we need a comprehensive review of the progress that has been made and the progress that might be anticipated in the future. Second, we need to accelerate the development of capacity and opportunity for health policy and systems research in low- and middle-income countries. A focus on results should be extended to cultivate a culture of learning for improvement. Third, we need a revitalized approach to stewardship that reflects the pluralistic reality of contemporary health systems and prioritizes health policy and systems research across all countries. Through such stewardship, we need to nurture a shared agenda around: (i) cross-country comparative research on health systems issues of common concern; (ii) agreements on the prioritization of global public goods related to the development of measures and methods for health policy and systems research; and (iii) best practices in evidence synthesis and knowledge translation. We need to appreciate the progress made over the last two decades and develop strategies to use systems science in progressing towards universal health coverage.
  6 in total

1.  The World Health Report 2006: working together for health.

Authors:  J-J Guilbert
Journal:  Educ Health (Abingdon)       Date:  2006-11

2.  The Global Campaign for the Health MDGs: challenges, opportunities, and the imperative of shared learning.

Authors:  Christopher J L Murray; Julio Frenk; Timothy Evans
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The Bamako call to action: research for health.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  An assessment of interactions between global health initiatives and country health systems.

Authors:  Badara Samb; Tim Evans; Mark Dybul; Rifat Atun; Jean-Paul Moatti; Sania Nishtar; Anna Wright; Francesca Celletti; Justine Hsu; Jim Yong Kim; Ruairi Brugha; Asia Russell; Carissa Etienne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Trends in health policy and systems research over the past decade: still too little capacity in low-income countries.

Authors:  Taghreed Adam; Saad Ahmad; Maryam Bigdeli; Abdul Ghaffar; John-Arne Røttingen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  India's new health systems knowledge platform-making research matter.

Authors:  Kabir Sheikh; Sanjiv Kumar; Rajani Ved; Satish Kumar; V R Raman; Abdul Ghaffar; Nhan Tran; Srinath Reddy; Soumya Swaminathan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Association of socioeconomic status with financial burden of disease among elderly patients with cardiovascular disease: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey.

Authors:  Chunyan Li; Belinda-Rose Young; Weiyan Jian
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Process evaluations of primary care interventions addressing chronic disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hueiming Liu; Alim Mohammed; Janani Shanthosh; Madeline News; Tracey-Lea Laba; Maree L Hackett; David Peiris; Stephen Jan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.