Keith B Allen1, Adnan K Chhatriwalla2, David J Cohen2, John T Saxon3, Sanjeev Aggarwal3, Anthony Hart3, Suzanne Baron2, J Russell Davis3, Alex F Pak3, Danny Dvir4, A Michael Borkon2. 1. Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri; University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri. Electronic address: kallen2340@aol.com. 2. Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri; University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri. 3. Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri. 4. St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement is less effective in small surgical bioprostheses. We evaluated the feasibility of bioprosthetic valve fracture with a high-pressure balloon to facilitate valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS: In vitro bench testing on aortic tissue valves was performed on 19-mm and 21-mm Mitroflow (Sorin, Milan, Italy), Magna and Magna Ease (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA), Trifecta and Biocor Epic (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN), and Hancock II and Mosaic (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). High-pressure balloons Tru Dilation, Atlas Gold, and Dorado (C.R. Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) were used to determine which valves could be fractured and at what pressure fracture occurred. RESULTS: Mitroflow, Magna, Magna Ease, Mosaic, and Biocor Epic surgical valves were successfully fractured using high-pressures balloon 1 mm larger than the labeled valve size whereas Trifecta and Hancock II surgical valves could not be fractured. Only the internal valve frame was fractured, and the sewing cuff was never disrupted. Manufacturer's rated burst pressures for balloons were exceeded, with fracture pressures ranging from 8 to 24 atmospheres depending on the surgical valve. Testing further demonstrated that fracture facilitated the expansion of previously constrained, underexpanded transcatheter valves (both balloon and self-expanding) to the manufacturer's recommended size. CONCLUSIONS: Bench testing demonstrates that the frame of most, but not all, bioprosthetic surgical aortic valves can be fractured using high-pressure balloons. The safety of bioprosthetic valve fracture to optimize valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in small surgical valves requires further clinical investigation.
BACKGROUND: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement is less effective in small surgical bioprostheses. We evaluated the feasibility of bioprosthetic valve fracture with a high-pressure balloon to facilitate valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS: In vitro bench testing on aortic tissue valves was performed on 19-mm and 21-mm Mitroflow (Sorin, Milan, Italy), Magna and Magna Ease (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA), Trifecta and Biocor Epic (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN), and Hancock II and Mosaic (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). High-pressure balloons Tru Dilation, Atlas Gold, and Dorado (C.R. Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) were used to determine which valves could be fractured and at what pressure fracture occurred. RESULTS: Mitroflow, Magna, Magna Ease, Mosaic, and Biocor Epic surgical valves were successfully fractured using high-pressures balloon 1 mm larger than the labeled valve size whereas Trifecta and Hancock II surgical valves could not be fractured. Only the internal valve frame was fractured, and the sewing cuff was never disrupted. Manufacturer's rated burst pressures for balloons were exceeded, with fracture pressures ranging from 8 to 24 atmospheres depending on the surgical valve. Testing further demonstrated that fracture facilitated the expansion of previously constrained, underexpanded transcatheter valves (both balloon and self-expanding) to the manufacturer's recommended size. CONCLUSIONS: Bench testing demonstrates that the frame of most, but not all, bioprosthetic surgical aortic valves can be fractured using high-pressure balloons. The safety of bioprosthetic valve fracture to optimize valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in small surgical valves requires further clinical investigation.
Authors: R Yazan Kherallah; Srikanth Koneru; Zvonimir Krajcer; Ourania Preventza; Kathryn G Dougherty; Melissa L McCormack; Briana T Costello; Stephanie Coulter; Neil E Strickman; Juan Carlos Plana Gomez; Ali Mortazavi; Jose G Díez; James J Livesay; Joseph S Coselli; Guilherme V Silva Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2021-09
Authors: Dmitry Levin; G Burkhard Mackensen; Mark Reisman; James M McCabe; Danny Dvir; Beth Ripley Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Anupama Shivaraju; Jonathan Michel; Antonio H Frangieh; Ilka Ott; Christian Thilo; Heribert Schunkert; Adnan Kastrati; Martin B Leon; Danny Dvir; Susheel Kodali; Vinayak Bapat; Mayra Guerrero; Albert M Kasel Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-07-07 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Horea Feier; Andrei Grigorescu; Lucian Falnita; Oana Rachita; Marian Gaspar; Constantin T Luca Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 4.241