Literature DB >> 28669503

Impact of Adverse Events and Length of Stay on Patient Experience After Lung Cancer Resection.

Emma J M Grigor1, Jelena Ivanovic1, Caitlin Anstee2, Zach Zhang3, Sebastian Gilbert2, Donna E Maziak4, Farid M Shamji2, Sudhir Sundaresan2, Patrick J Villeneuve2, Tim Ramsay5, Andrew J E Seely6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative adverse events (AEs), prolonged length of stay (PLOS), and patient experience are common quality measures after thoracic surgical procedures. Our objective was to investigate the relationship of postoperative AEs on patient experience and hospital length of stay (LOS) after lung cancer resection.
METHODS: AEs (using Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system based on Clavien-Dindo schema) and LOS were prospectively collected for all patients undergoing lung cancer resection. A 21-item questionnaire, retrospectively asking about patient experience, was mailed to patients twice (October 2015 and January 2016). The impact of AEs on experience was investigated and stratified by hospital LOS, with PLOS defined as the 75th percentile. Univariate analysis used parametric (t test) and nonparametric (Mann-Whitney) tests according to test conditions.
RESULTS: Of 288 patients who responded to the survey (70% response rate), 175 (61%) had no AEs, 113 (39%) had experienced at least one AE, and 52 (18%) had experienced PLOS. Lung cancer patients who experienced PLOS showed significantly decreased experience on several questionnaire items, including their impression of comprehensiveness of surgeons information provision during inpatient period (p = 0.008), inpatient recovery from operation (p = 0.001), quality of life 30 days after operation (p = 0.032), follow-up care, (p = 0.022), and satisfaction with outcome 1 year after operation during follow-up care (p = 0.022). The presence of postoperative AEs led only to reduced impression about inpatient recovery from the operation (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, postoperative AEs were minimally associated with negative patient experience. However, patients who experienced PLOS demonstrated a marked reduction in experience after thoracic surgical procedures.
Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28669503     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to avoid pulmonary complications after lung cancer resection.

Authors:  Patrick James Villeneuve
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  A Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of an Exercise Program for Lung Cancer Survivors After Curative-Intent Treatment.

Authors:  Duc Ha; Jacqueline Kerr; Andrew L Ries; Mark M Fuster; Scott M Lippman; James D Murphy
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated using video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy.

Authors:  Like Zhang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  The Effect of Major and Minor Complications After Lung Surgery on Length of Stay and Readmission.

Authors:  Christian J Finley; Housne A Begum; Kendra Pearce; John Agzarian; Waël C Hanna; Yaron Shargall; Noori Akhtar-Danesh
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-02-01

5.  Measuring adverse events following hip arthroplasty surgery using administrative data without relying on ICD-codes.

Authors:  Martin Magnéli; Maria Unbeck; Cecilia Rogmark; Olof Sköldenberg; Max Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.