Kimberly A Hepner1, Susan M Paddock1, Katherine E Watkins1, Songthip T Ounpraseuth1, Amy M Schrader1, Teresa J Hudson1. 1. Dr. Hepner, Dr. Paddock, and Dr. Watkins are with the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California. Dr. Ounpraseuth and Ms. Schrader are with the Department of Biostatistics, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, and Dr. Hudson is with the Division of Health Services Research, all at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock. Dr. Ounpraseuth, Ms. Schrader, and Dr. Hudson are also with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether eight quality measures assessing care for patients with a substance use disorder were associated with patient perceptions of their care, including perceived improvement and global rating of behavioral health care. METHODS: Secondary data analyses were conducted of administrative and patient survey data collected as part of a national evaluation of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) mental health and substance use services. Data for patients who received care for substance use disorders during October 2006-September 2007 paid for by the VHA and who participated in a telephone interview about their care (N=2,074) were included. Measures of patient perceptions of care included perceived improvement and global rating of behavioral health care. Eight quality measures based on administrative data assessed initiation and engagement in substance use disorder care, receipt of psychotherapy or psychosocial treatment, and follow-up after hospitalization. Regression models were conducted in which each quality measure predicted each outcome, with analyses adjusting for patient characteristics and functioning. RESULTS: Treatment engagement, two measures of psychotherapy receipt, and psychosocial treatment were significantly associated with perceived improvement, whereas treatment initiation and follow-up after hospitalization (seven and 30 days) were not. Psychotherapy receipt and follow-up after hospitalization (seven and 30 days) were significantly associated with global rating of behavioral health care. CONCLUSIONS: Some quality measures assessing care for substance use disorders were significantly associated with patient perceptions of care. Results provide additional support for these quality measures and suggest that patient perceptions of care are an important outcome in assessing care.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether eight quality measures assessing care for patients with a substance use disorder were associated with patient perceptions of their care, including perceived improvement and global rating of behavioral health care. METHODS: Secondary data analyses were conducted of administrative and patient survey data collected as part of a national evaluation of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) mental health and substance use services. Data for patients who received care for substance use disorders during October 2006-September 2007 paid for by the VHA and who participated in a telephone interview about their care (N=2,074) were included. Measures of patient perceptions of care included perceived improvement and global rating of behavioral health care. Eight quality measures based on administrative data assessed initiation and engagement in substance use disorder care, receipt of psychotherapy or psychosocial treatment, and follow-up after hospitalization. Regression models were conducted in which each quality measure predicted each outcome, with analyses adjusting for patient characteristics and functioning. RESULTS: Treatment engagement, two measures of psychotherapy receipt, and psychosocial treatment were significantly associated with perceived improvement, whereas treatment initiation and follow-up after hospitalization (seven and 30 days) were not. Psychotherapy receipt and follow-up after hospitalization (seven and 30 days) were significantly associated with global rating of behavioral health care. CONCLUSIONS: Some quality measures assessing care for substance use disorders were significantly associated with patient perceptions of care. Results provide additional support for these quality measures and suggest that patient perceptions of care are an important outcome in assessing care.
Entities:
Keywords:
patient perceptions; quality measures; substance use disorders
Authors: Meredith G Harris; Chrianna Bharat; Meyer D Glantz; Nancy A Sampson; Ali Al-Hamzawi; Jordi Alonso; Ronny Bruffaerts; José Miguel Caldas de Almeida; Alfredo H Cia; Giovanni de Girolamo; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Hristo Hinkov; Elie G Karam; Georges Karam; Sing Lee; Jean-Pierre Lépine; Daphna Levinson; Victor Makanjuola; John McGrath; Zeina Mneimneh; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; Marina Piazza; José Posada-Villa; Charlene Rapsey; Hisateru Tachimori; Margreet Ten Have; Yolanda Torres; Maria Carmen Viana; Somnath Chatterji; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler; Louisa Degenhardt Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-06-02 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Arthur Robin Williams; Edward V Nunes; Adam Bisaga; Harold A Pincus; Kimberly A Johnson; Aimee N Campbell; Remien H Remien; Stephen Crystal; Peter D Friedmann; Frances R Levin; Mark Olfson Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2018-06-02