Literature DB >> 28669003

Aggression, interference, and the functional response of coral-feeding butterflyfishes.

Shane A Blowes1,2,3, Morgan S Pratchett4, Sean R Connolly5,4.   

Abstract

Functional responses describing how foraging rates change with respect to resource density are central to our understanding of interspecific interactions. Competitive interactions are an important determinant of foraging rates; however, the relationship between the exploitation and interference components of competition has received little empirical or theoretical consideration. Moreover, little is known about the relationship between aggressive behavioural interactions and interference competition. Using a natural gradient of consumer and resource densities, we empirically examine how aggressiveness relates to consumer-consumer encounter rates and foraging for four species of Chaetodon reef fish spanning a range of dietary niche breadths. The probability of aggression was most strongly associated with both total consumer and resource densities. In contrast, total encounter rates were best predicted by conspecific consumer density, and were highest for the most specialised consumer (Chaetodon trifascialis), not the most aggressive (Chaetodon baronessa). The most specialised consumer, not the most aggressive, also exhibited the largest reduction in foraging rates with increasing consumer density. Our results support the idea of a positive link between the exploitation and interference components of competition for the most specialised consumer. Moreover, our results caution against inferring the presence of ecological interactions (competition) from observations of behaviour (aggression and agonism) alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Butterflyfish; Chaetodontidae; Competition; Coral reef; Prey risk; Territoriality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28669003     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3902-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  A comparative field study of the social behavior and related ecology of reef fishes of the family Chaetodontidae1)2).

Authors:  E S Reese
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1975-02

Review 3.  Monogamy in marine fishes.

Authors:  E A Whiteman; I M Côte
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2004-05

4.  Synthesizing mechanisms of density dependence in reef fishes: behavior, habitat configuration, and observational scale.

Authors:  J Wilson White; Jameal F Samhouri; Adrian C Stier; Clare L Wormald; Scott L Hamilton; Stuart A Sandin
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Mark A McPeek
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control.

Authors:  M P Hassell; G C Varley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Ecology and evolution of resource-related heterospecific aggression.

Authors:  Kathryn S Peiman; Beren W Robinson
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.875

8.  Heterospecific aggression and dominance in a guild of coral-feeding fishes: the roles of dietary ecology and phylogeny.

Authors:  Shane A Blowes; Morgan S Pratchett; Sean R Connolly
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  The functional response of a hoarding seed predator to mast seeding.

Authors:  Quinn E Fletcher; Stan Boutin; Jeffrey E Lane; Jalene M LaMontagne; Andrew G McAdam; Charles J Krebs; Murray M Humphries
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Mutual interference is common and mostly intermediate in magnitude.

Authors:  John P Delong; David A Vasseur
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.