Literature DB >> 28668879

Correlation Between Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADCmin) and Tumor Cellularity: A Meta-analysis.

Alexey Surov1, Hans Jonas Meyer2, Andreas Wienke3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique based on measure of water diffusion that can provide information about tissue microstructure, especially about cell count. Increase of cell density induces restriction of water diffusion and decreases apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). ADC can be divided into three sub-parameters: ADC minimum or ADCmin, mean ADC or ADCmean and ADC maximum or ADCmax Some studies have suggested that ADCmin shows stronger correlations with cell count in comparison to other ADC fractions and may be used as a parameter for estimation of tumor cellularity. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to summarize correlation coefficients between ADCmin and cellularity in different tumors based on large patient data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this analysis, MEDLINE database was screened for associations between ADC and cell count in different tumors up to September 2016. For this work, only data regarding ADCmin were included. Overall, 12 publications with 317 patients were identified. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze associations between ADCmin and cellularity. The reported Pearson correlation coefficients in some publications were converted into Spearman correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: The pooled correlation coefficient for all included studies was ρ=-0.59 (95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.72 to -0.45), heterogeneity Tau2=0.04 (p<0.0001), I2=73%, test for overall effect Z=8.67 (p<0.00001).
CONCLUSION: ADCmin correlated moderately with tumor cellularity. The calculated correlation coefficient is not stronger in comparison to the reported coefficient for ADCmean and, therefore, ADCmin does not represent a better means to reflect cellularity. Copyright
© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient; meta-analysis; tumor cellularity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28668879     DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  21 in total

Review 1.  Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement of the parotid gland parenchyma.

Authors:  Maja Bruvo; Faisal Mahmood
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08

2.  Long-term apparent diffusion coefficient value changes in patients undergoing radiosurgical treatment of meningiomas.

Authors:  Jatta Berberat; Ulrich Roelcke; Luca Remonda; Lucia Schwyzer
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Combining hyperintense FLAIR rim and radiological features in identifying IDH mutant 1p/19q non-codeleted lower-grade glioma.

Authors:  Mingxiao Li; Xiaohui Ren; Xuzhu Chen; Jincheng Wang; Shaoping Shen; Haihui Jiang; Chuanwei Yang; Xuzhe Zhao; Qinghui Zhu; Yong Cui; Song Lin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Minimal apparent diffusion coefficient in predicting the Ki-67 proliferation index of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Yijing Xie; Shipeng Zhang; Xianwang Liu; Xiaoyu Huang; Qing Zhou; Yongjun Luo; Qian Niu; Junlin Zhou
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.701

5.  An analysis of Ki-67 expression in stage 1 invasive ductal breast carcinoma using apparent diffusion coefficient histograms.

Authors:  Maolin Xu; Qi Tang; Manxiu Li; Yulin Liu; Fang Li
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

6.  Associations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and KI 67 in different tumors: a meta-analysis. Part 2: ADCmin.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Hans Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-04

7.  Histological grades of rectal cancer: whole-volume histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient based on reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Yang Peng; Hao Tang; Xiaoyan Meng; Yaqi Shen; Daoyu Hu; Ihab Kamel; Zhen Li
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-01

8.  18F-FDG-PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for monitoring a BRAF and CDK 4/6 inhibitor combination therapy in a murine model of human melanoma.

Authors:  Ralf S Eschbach; Philipp M Kazmierczak; Maurice M Heimer; Andrei Todica; Heidrun Hirner-Eppeneder; Moritz J Schneider; Georg Keinrath; Olga Solyanik; Jessica Olivier; Wolfgang G Kunz; Maximilian F Reiser; Peter Bartenstein; Jens Ricke; Clemens C Cyran
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Proving of a Mathematical Model of Cell Calculation Based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Nikita Garnov
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Comparison of Two Mathematical Models of Cellularity Calculation.

Authors:  Hans Jonas Meyer; Nikita Garnov; Alexey Surov
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.