Literature DB >> 28668595

Diagnosing ozone stress and differential tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with ethylenediurea (EDU).

Md Ashrafuzzaman1, Farzana Afrose Lubna2, Felix Holtkamp2, William J Manning3, Thorsten Kraska4, Michael Frei5.   

Abstract

Rising tropospheric ozone concentrations in Asia necessitate the breeding of adapted rice varieties to ensure food security. However, breeding requires field-based evaluation of ample plant material, which can be technically challenging or very costly when using ozone fumigation facilities. The chemical ethylenediurea (EDU) has been proposed for estimating the effects of ozone in large-scale field applications, but controlled experiments investigating constitutive effects on rice or its suitability to detect genotypic differences in ozone tolerance are missing. This study comprised a controlled open top chamber experiment with four treatments (i) control (average ozone concentration 16 ppb), (ii) control with EDU application, (iii) ozone stress (average 77 ppb for 7 h daily throughout the season), and (iv) ozone stress with EDU application. Three contrasting rice genotypes were tested, i.e. the tolerant line L81 and the sensitive Nipponbare and BR28. The ozone treatment had significant negative effects on plant growth (height and tillering), stomatal conductance, SPAD value, spectral reflectance indices such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), lipid peroxidation, as well as biomass and grain yields. These negative effects were more pronounced in the a priori sensitive varieties, especially the widely grown Bangladeshi variety BR28, which showed grain yield reductions by 37 percent. EDU application had almost no effects on plants in the absence of ozone, but partly mitigated ozone effects on foliar symptoms, lipid peroxidation, SPAD value, stomatal conductance, several spectral reflectance parameters, panicle number, grain yield, and spikelet sterility. EDU responses were more pronounced in sensitive genotypes than in the tolerant L81. In conclusion, EDU had no constitutive effects on rice and partly offset negative ozone effects, especially in sensitive varieties. It can thus be used to diagnose ozone damage in field grown rice and for distinguishing tolerant (less EDU-responsive) and sensitive (more EDU-responsive) genotypes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Breeding; Cereals; Food security; Global change; Phenotyping

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28668595     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  4 in total

1.  Clusia hilariana and Eugenia uniflora as bioindicators of atmospheric pollutants emitted by an iron pelletizing factory in Brazil.

Authors:  Luzimar Campos da Silva; Talita Oliveira de Araújo; Advanio Inácio Siqueira-Silva; Tiago Augusto Rodrigues Pereira; Letícia Nalon Castro; Eduardo Chagas Silva; Marco Antonio Oliva; Aristéa Alves Azevedo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Effects of ethylenediurea (EDU) on apoplast and chloroplast proteome in two wheat varieties under high ambient ozone: an approach to investigate EDU's mode of action.

Authors:  Sunil K Gupta; Marisha Sharma; Vivek K Maurya; Farah Deeba; Vivek Pandey
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 3.356

3.  Interactive effects of tropospheric ozone and blast disease (Magnaporthe oryzae) on different rice genotypes.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahedul Alam; Angeline Wanjiku Maina; Yanru Feng; Lin-Bo Wu; Michael Frei
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  Ethylenediurea reduces grain chalkiness in hybrid rice cultivars under ambient levels of surface ozone in China.

Authors:  Guoyou Zhang; Hamdulla Risalat; Kazuhiko Kobayashi; Rong Cao; Qinan Hu; Xiaoya Pan; Yaxin Hu; Bo Shang; Hengchao Wu; Zujian Zhang; Zhaozhong Feng
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 6.627

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.