Literature DB >> 28668360

Reproductive Coercion in High School-Aged Girls: Associations with Reproductive Health Risk and Intimate Partner Violence.

Jennifer L Northridge1, Ellen J Silver2, Hina J Talib3, Susan M Coupey3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of reproductive coercion, a form of intimate partner violence (IPV) including contraceptive sabotage and pregnancy pressure, among urban high school-aged girls and to examine its associations with reproductive health risks. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A self-administered survey completed by high school-aged girls living in high-poverty neighborhoods while awaiting medical care in a pediatric emergency room, inpatient service, school-based, and hospital-based clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-nine sexually active girls aged 14-17 years. INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To determine the prevalence of reproductive coercion and to examine associations with unprotected sex, sexually transmitted infections, physical IPV, and risk factors for abusive relationships.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 149 (19%) of girls reported reproductive coercion, most frequently that a romantic or sexual partner had ever: "told them not to use any birth control" (n = 23; 79%); "took off a condom during sex so they would get pregnant" (n = 12; 43%); and "said he would leave them if they didn't get pregnant" (n = 6; 21%). Girls reporting reproductive coercion were nearly 3 times more likely than those not coerced to have had chlamydia (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-7.19) and nearly 5 times more likely to report IPV (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.0-11.8). In addition, girls reporting coercion were less likely to have high recognition of abusive behaviors (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.8) and less likely to have high comfort communicating with their sexual partners (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7) than girls not reporting coercion.
CONCLUSION: Reproductive coercion is experienced by 1 in 5 high school-aged girls in a high-poverty community and is associated with chlamydia infection and IPV. Awareness of the high prevalence and health risks of coercion might allow for intervention.
Copyright © 2017 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Chlamydia trachomatis; Intimate partner violence; Reproductive coercion; Reproductive health; Unprotected sex

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28668360     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2017.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol        ISSN: 1083-3188            Impact factor:   1.814


  16 in total

1.  Adolescent Reproductive and Sexual Coercion: Measurement Invariance in a Population-Based Sample of Male and Female High School Students.

Authors:  Julianna M Nemeth; Nelie Viveiros; Kellie R Lynch; Tia Stevens Anderson; Bonnie Fisher
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2019-08-28

2.  Risk Markers for Physical Teen Dating Violence Victimization in the United States: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chelsea M Spencer; Kristin M Anders; Michelle L Toews; Sarah K Emanuels
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2020-01-23

3.  Coerced Choice: Resigned Contraceptive Usership Among Individuals Affected by Reproductive Coercion.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fay; Summer Corry; Rebecca G Simmons; Jami Baayd
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Integrating anti-violence efforts into sexual and reproductive health: Reproductive coercion as a case example.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fay; Chiamaka Onwuzurike; Ashley Finley; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Hybrid Masculinity and Young Men's Circumscribed Engagement in Contraceptive Management.

Authors:  Ann M Fefferman; Ushma D Upadhyay
Journal:  Gend Soc       Date:  2018-04-02

6.  "Having a Child Meant I had a Real Life": Reproductive Coercion and Childbearing Motivations Among Young Black Men Living in Baltimore.

Authors:  Kamila A Alexander; Renata Arrington Sanders; Karen Trister Grace; Roland J Thorpe; Elizabeth Doro; Lisa Bowleg
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2019-06-14

7.  Reproductive coercion, intimate partner violence, and pregnancy risk among adolescent women with a history of foster care involvement.

Authors:  Morgan E PettyJohn; Taylor A Reid; Elizabeth Miller; Katherine W Bogen; Heather L McCauley
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2020-11-19

8.  Birth Control Sabotage as a Correlate of Women's Sexual Health Risk: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Tiara C Willie; Kamila A Alexander; Amy Caplon; Trace S Kershaw; Cara B Safon; Rachel W Galvao; Clair Kaplan; Abigail Caldwell; Sarah K Calabrese
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-11-18

9.  Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Unintended Pregnancy Among Latina Women.

Authors:  Karen Trister Grace; Michele R Decker; Kamila A Alexander; Jacquelyn Campbell; Elizabeth Miller; Nancy Perrin; Nancy Glass
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2020-06-02

10.  Correlates of reproductive coercion among college women in abusive relationships: baseline data from the college safety study.

Authors:  Karen Trister Grace; Nancy A Perrin; Amber Clough; Elizabeth Miller; Nancy E Glass
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2020-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.