Literature DB >> 28668287

Prognostic Value of PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression in Patients with High Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Laura-Maria Krabbe1, Barbara Heitplatz2, Sina Preuss3, Ryan C Hutchinson4, Solomon L Woldu4, Nirmish Singla4, Martin Boegemann3, Christopher G Wood5, Jose A Karam5, Alon Z Weizer6, Jay D Raman7, Mesut Remzi8, Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq9, Andrea Haitel10, Leonid M Rapoport11, Peter V Glybochko11, Marco Roscigno12, Christian Bolenz13, Karim Bensalah14, Arthur I Sagalowsky4, Shahrokh F Shariat8, Yair Lotan4, Evanguelos Xylinas15, Vitaly Margulis16.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the prognostic value of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in patients with high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue microarrays of 423 patients treated with extirpative surgery for high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma from the International Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma collaboration were stained for PD-1 and PD-L1 using antibodies, including Cell Marque™ NAT105 diluted 1:250 and prediluted E1L3N® via immunohistochemistry. A 1% or greater staining rate of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (PD-1) and tumor cells (PD-L1) was considered positive. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess independent prognosticators of survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Median patient age was 70.0 years and median followup was 37.0 months. PD-1 and PD-L1 were positive in 37.2% and 26.2% of patients, respectively. PD-1 positivity was significantly associated with adverse pathological characteristics while PD-L1 positivity was associated with favorable pT stage. On univariate analysis PD-1 expression was associated with worse recurrence-free, cancer specific and overall survival. On multivariate analysis PD-1 expression was an independent prognosticator of cancer specific survival (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.03-2.66, p = 0.039) and overall survival (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.05-2.24, p = 0.029) but not recurrence-free survival (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.16, p = 0.139). On univariate analysis PD-L1 expression was not significantly associated with survival outcomes. However, on multivariate analysis in patients with organ confined disease (pT2 or less, pN0/x and cM0), PD-L1 positivity was an independent prognosticator of recurrence-free survival (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.06-0.98, p = 0.046) and overall survival (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.11-0.63, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: PD-1 positivity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was associated with adverse pathological criteria and independent prognostication of worse survival outcomes. PD-L1 positivity of tumor cells was an independent prognosticator of favorable survival outcomes in cases of organ confined disease.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; carcinoma; lymphocytes; programmed cell death 1 receptor; tumor-infiltrating; urinary tract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28668287     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Prognostic value of PD-L1 combined positive score in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Chien-Hsu Chen; Mu-Yao Tsai; Ping-Chia Chiang; Ming-Tse Sung; Hao-Lun Luo; Jau-Ling Suen; Eing-Mei Tsai; Po-Hui Chiang
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.968

2.  The immune microenvironment and expression of PD-L1, PD-1, PRAME and MHC I in salivary duct carcinoma.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Achim A Jungbluth; Denise Frosina; Bayan Alzumaili; Nathaniel Aleynick; Elzbieta Slodkowska; Kevin Higgins; Alan Ho; Luc Morris; Ronald Ghossein; Nora Katabi
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Prognostic relevance of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Kyu Sang Lee; Kyoungyul Lee; Sumi Yun; Seyoung Moon; Yujun Park; Jung Ho Han; Chae-Yong Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Gheeyoung Choe
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Immunology: PD-1 and PD-L1 prognostic in UTUC.

Authors:  Louise Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  The clinicopathological and prognostic value of PD-L1 in urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaoan Wen; Yeda Chen; Xiaolu Duan; Wei Zhu; Chao Cai; Tuo Deng; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Development and validation of a PD-L1/PD-1/CD8 axis-based classifier to predict cancer survival of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Junyu Chen; Wenlong Zhong; Meng Yang; Weibin Hou; Xiaofei Wang; Kun Xia; Hao Yu; Meihua Yang; Bingkun Zhou; Bo Wang; Jian Huang; Tianxin Lin
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 7.  [Immunological biomarker research in uro-oncology-using the example of urothelial cancer].

Authors:  Markus Eckstein
Journal:  Urologie       Date:  2022-05-30

8.  The COX-2-PGE2 Pathway Promotes Tumor Evasion in Colorectal Adenomas.

Authors:  Jie Wei; Jinyu Zhang; Dingzhi Wang; Bo Cen; Jessica D Lang; Raymond N DuBois
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2022-05-03

9.  Expression of Phospho-ELK1 and Its Prognostic Significance in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Satoshi Inoue; Hiroki Ide; Kazutoshi Fujita; Taichi Mizushima; Guiyang Jiang; Takashi Kawahara; Seiji Yamaguchi; Hiroaki Fushimi; Norio Nonomura; Hiroshi Miyamoto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Risk stratification for upper tract urinary carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel Benamran; Thomas Seisen; Elias Naoum; Christophe Vaessen; Jérome Parra; Pierre Mozer; Shahrokh F Shariat; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.