Literature DB >> 28668180

Reducing risk and increasing confidence of decision making at a lower cost: In-situ pXRF assessment of metal-contaminated sites.

Marek Rouillon1, Mark P Taylor2, Chenyin Dong3.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the in-situ use of field portable X-ray Fluorescence (pXRF) for metal-contaminated site assessments, and assesses the advantages of increased sampling to reduce risk, and increase confidence of decision making at a lower cost. Five metal-contaminated sites were assessed using both in-situ pXRF and ex-situ inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analyses at various sampling resolutions. Twenty second in-situ pXRF measurements of Mn, Zn and Pb were corrected using a subset of parallel ICP-MS measurements taken at each site. Field and analytical duplicates revealed sampling as the major contributor (>95% variation) to measurement uncertainties. This study shows that increased sampling led to several benefits including more representative site characterisation, higher soil-metal mapping resolution, reduced uncertainty around the site mean, and reduced sampling uncertainty. Real time pXRF data enabled efficient, on-site decision making for further judgemental sampling, without the need to return to the site. Additionally, in-situ pXRF was more cost effective than the current approach of ex-situ sampling and ICP-MS analysis, even with higher sampling at each site. Lastly, a probabilistic site assessment approach was applied to demonstrate the advantages of integrating estimated measurement uncertainties into site reporting.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Field portable XRF spectrometry; In-situ pXRF; Measurement uncertainty; Metal-contamination; Site assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28668180     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  6 in total

1.  In situ investigation of heavy metals at trace concentrations in greenhouse soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  Kang Tian; Biao Huang; Zhe Xing; Wenyou Hu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Qualitative comparison of elemental concentration in soils and other geomaterials using FP-XRF.

Authors:  Pranjal Singh; Manoj Datta; G V Ramana; Sanjay Kumar Gupta; Tabarak Malik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Estimates of potential childhood lead exposure from contaminated soil using the USEPA IEUBK model in Melbourne, Australia.

Authors:  Mark A S Laidlaw; Callum Gordon; Mark P Taylor; Andrew S Ball
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  A general framework and practical procedure for improving pxrf measurement accuracy with integrating moisture content and organic matter content parameters.

Authors:  Zengsiche Chen; Ya Xu; Guoyuan Lei; Yuqiang Liu; Jingcai Liu; Guangyuan Yao; Qifei Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Cost Effectiveness of Environmental Lead Risk Mitigation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Bret Ericson; Jack Caravanos; Conrado Depratt; Cynthia Santos; Mishelle Gomez Cabral; Richard Fuller; Mark Patrick Taylor
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2018-02-22

6.  Identification of trace metals and potential anthropogenic influences on the historic New York African Burial Ground population: A pXRF technology approach.

Authors:  Carter K Clinton; Candice M Duncan; Richard K Shaw; Latifa Jackson; Fatimah L C Jackson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.