Guilherme Thiesen1,2, B F Gribel3, M P M Freitas4, D R Oliver5, K B Kim5. 1. Department of Orthodontics, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Av. Madre Benvenuta, 1285 Santa Monica, 88035-001, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil. thiesen.guilherme@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA. thiesen.guilherme@gmail.com. 3. , Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. 4. Department of Orthodontics, Luteran University of Brazil, Canoas, Brazil. 5. Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics affecting different intensities of mandibular asymmetry in skeletal Class II adults using three-dimensional images. This study is clinically relevant since it allows professionals to evaluate the morphological components related to these deformities and more carefully obtain correct diagnosis and treatment plan for such patients. METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography data of 120 Class II patients (40 with relative symmetry, 40 with moderate asymmetry, and 40 with severe asymmetry) were imported to SimPlant Ortho Pro® 2.0 software (Dental Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Three reference planes were established and linear measurements were performed from specific landmarks to these planes, comparing the deviated side and the contralateral side in each group, as well as the differences between groups. The correlation between midline mandibular asymmetry and other variables was also evaluated. Statistical analyses considered a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Comparing the values obtained on the deviated side and on the contralateral side, there were significant differences for patients with moderate asymmetry and severe asymmetry. However, differences were seen more often in severe mandibular asymmetries. In those patients, there was a significant correlation of the gnathion deviation with lower dental midline deviation, difference in the lateral gonion positions, difference in the mandibular rami heights, and difference in the jugale vertical displacements. CONCLUSIONS: For skeletal Class II patients with mandibular asymmetry, some craniofacial features are related to chin deviation and require proper evaluation, including the bilateral differences in the ramus height, mandibular body length, transverse and vertical positioning of the gonion and jugale points.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics affecting different intensities of mandibular asymmetry in skeletal Class II adults using three-dimensional images. This study is clinically relevant since it allows professionals to evaluate the morphological components related to these deformities and more carefully obtain correct diagnosis and treatment plan for such patients. METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography data of 120 Class II patients (40 with relative symmetry, 40 with moderate asymmetry, and 40 with severe asymmetry) were imported to SimPlant Ortho Pro® 2.0 software (Dental Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Three reference planes were established and linear measurements were performed from specific landmarks to these planes, comparing the deviated side and the contralateral side in each group, as well as the differences between groups. The correlation between midline mandibular asymmetry and other variables was also evaluated. Statistical analyses considered a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Comparing the values obtained on the deviated side and on the contralateral side, there were significant differences for patients with moderate asymmetry and severe asymmetry. However, differences were seen more often in severe mandibular asymmetries. In those patients, there was a significant correlation of the gnathion deviation with lower dental midline deviation, difference in the lateral gonion positions, difference in the mandibular rami heights, and difference in the jugale vertical displacements. CONCLUSIONS: For skeletal Class II patients with mandibular asymmetry, some craniofacial features are related to chin deviation and require proper evaluation, including the bilateral differences in the ramus height, mandibular body length, transverse and vertical positioning of the gonion and jugale points.
Authors: R Burgersdijk; G J Truin; F Frankenmolen; H Kalsbeek; M van't Hof; J Mulder Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Date: 1991-04 Impact factor: 3.383
Authors: Karine Evangelista; Ana Beatriz Teodoro; Jonas Bianchi; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Maria Alves Garcia Silva; José Valladares-Neto Journal: Angle Orthod Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 2.079