| Literature DB >> 28667228 |
Jomme Claes1, Roselien Buys1, Catherine Woods2, Andrew Briggs3, Claudia Geue3, Moira Aitken3, Niall Moyna4, Kieran Moran4, Noel McCaffrey4, Ioanna Chouvarda5, Deirdre Walsh4, Werner Budts1,6, Dimitris Filos5, Andreas Triantafyllidis5, Nicos Maglaveras5, Véronique A Cornelissen7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) independently alters the clinical course of cardiovascular diseases resulting in a significant reduction in all-cause and cardiac mortality. However, only 15%-30% of all eligible patients participate in a phase 2 ambulatory programme. The uptake rate of community-based programmes following phase 2 CR and adherence to long-term exercise is extremely poor. Newer care models, involving telerehabilitation programmes that are delivered remotely, show considerable promise for increasing adherence. In this view, the PATHway (Physical Activity Towards Health) platform was developed and now needs to be evaluated in terms of its feasibility and clinical efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a multicentre randomised controlled pilot trial, 120 participants (m/f, age 40-80 years) completing a phase 2 ambulatory CR programme will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to PATHway or usual care. PATHway involves a comprehensive, internet-enabled, sensor-based home CR platform and provides individualised heart rate monitored exercise programmes (exerclasses and exergames) as the basis on which to provide a personalised lifestyle intervention programme. The control group will receive usual care. Study outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after completion of phase 2 of the CR programme. The primary outcome is the change in active energy expenditure. Secondary outcomes include cardiopulmonary endurance capacity, muscle strength, body composition, cardiovascular risk factors, peripheral endothelial vascular function, patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), well-being, mediators of behaviour change and safety. HRQoL and healthcare costs will be taken into account in cost-effectiveness evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This protocol has been approved by the director and clinical director of the PATHway study and by the ethical committee of each participating site. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations at congresses and events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02717806. This trial is currently in the pre-results stage. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation; design; exercise; randomized controlled trial; telemonitoring; telerehabilitation
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28667228 PMCID: PMC5726129 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Study schedule. CR, cardiac rehabilitation; PATHway, Physical Activity Towards Health.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the PATHway (Physical Activity Towards Health) trial
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
Men and women with documented cardiovascular disease who are enrolled for the first time in a CR programme Aged 40–80 years Participants are on optimal medical treatment and stable with regard to symptoms and pharmacotherapy for at least 4 weeks Participants must complete the ambulatory CR programme and receive clinical approval from their treating physician to continue exercising outside the hospital programme Internet access at home Sufficient space to deploy and use the system adequately | Significant illness during the last 6 weeks Known severe ventricular arrhythmia with functional or prognostic significance Significant myocardial ischaemia, haemodynamic deterioration or exercise-induced arrhythmia at baseline testing Cardiac disease that limits exercise tolerance (valve disease with significant haemodynamic consequences, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and so on) Comorbidity that may significantly influence 1-year prognosis Functional or mental disability that may limit exercise Acute or chronic inflammatory diseases or malignancy, the use of anti-inflammatory drugs or immune suppression Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (FEV1<50%) NYHA class 4 Participation in another clinical trial |
CR, cardiac rehabilitation.
Figure 2An overview of the PATHway (Physical Activity Towards Health) components: 1, the patient experiences a cardiac event; 2, the patient is treated in the hospital; 3, the patient participates in a phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme; 4+5+6, the patient uses PATHway after completion of phase 2 CR; 7, the patient is able to socially interact with other PATHway users via the system; 8, patient data are transmitted and used as feedback for the patient and health professionals; 9, this can allow an improvement of care by the health professional; 10+12, the patient can also monitor outdoor activities and upload them to the system afterwards; 11, patient data are aggregated and allow for possibility of undertaking large-scale, accurate, longitudinal health-based research—‘crowd sourced researching’ (13).
Tabulated summary of study schedule
| Enrolment | Baseline | FU3m | FU6m | |
| Eligibility screen | X | |||
| Informed consent | X | |||
| Allocation | X | |||
| PATHway intervention | ||||
| Usual care (control) intervention | ||||
| Assessments | ||||
| Physical activity | X | X | X | |
| Demographic characteristics | X | X | ||
| Health-related physical fitness | ||||
| CPET | X | X | X | |
| Muscle strength and flexibility | X | X | X | |
| Quality of the vascular system | X | X | X | |
| Blood sampling | X | X | ||
| Body composition | X | X | X | |
| Health-related QoL and psychosocial well-being | ||||
| PHQ-9 | X | X | X | |
| EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | X | X | x | |
| SF-36 questionnaire | X | X | X | |
| Exercise self-efficacy scale | X | X | X | |
| Medication adherence | X | X | X | |
| Exercise barriers | X | X | X | |
| Perceived stress scale | X | X | X | |
| ENRICHD | X | X | X | |
| Satisfaction/usability tests | X | |||
| Resource use data collection | X | X | X | |
| Safety monitoring | ||||
| Three-day ECG Holter monitoring | X | X | X | |
| Adverse event reporting | ||||
| Process evaluation (assessment of DSS) | ||||
| Validation of DSS outcomes captured in reports by clinical experts | X | X | X | |
Satisfaction/usability test will only be performed in the intervention group.
CPET, cardiopulmonary exercise test; DSS, decision support system; ENRICHD, Enhancing Recovery In Coronary Heart Disease; EQ-5D-5L, EuroQol-Five Dimensions-Five Levels Questionnaire; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire 9; QoL, Quality of Life; SF-36, Short Form 36; T, timepoint.
Questionnaires for assessment of psychological well-being and intervention effectiveness
| Questionnaire | Reference |
| Short Form-36 | Cruz LN, Camey SA, Fleck MP, Polanczyk CA. WHO quality of life instrument-brief and Short Form-36 in patients with coronary artery disease: do they measure similar quality of life concepts? Psychol Health Med. 2009 Oct;14(5):619–28. |
| Physical Health Questionnaire | Razykov, I., Ziegelstein, R., Whooley, M., & Thombs, B. (2012). The PHQ-9 versus the PHQ-8 - Is item nine useful for assessing suicide risk in coronary artery disease patients? Data from the Heart and Soul Study. Journal Of Psychosomatic Research, 73, 163–168. |
| Perceived Stress Scale | Cohen, S., Kamark, T., Mermelstein, R. (1982). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 24, 4: 385–396. |
| Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease | Vaglio J., Conard M., Poston W.S., O'Keefe J., Haddock C.K., House J. and Spertus J.A. (2004) Testing the performance of the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument in cardiac patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes; 2: 24. |
| Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale | Shields CA, Brawley LR. (2006). Preferring proxy-agency: impact on self-efficacy for exercise. J Health Psychol. 11(6):904–14. |
| Exercise Barriers | McAuley, E. (1992). The role of efficacy cognitions in the prediction of exercise behavior in middle-aged adults. |
| Exercise Intentions | Sniehotta, FF., Shwarzer, R., Sholz, U., & Shuz, B. (2005). Action plans and coping plans for long term lifestyle change: Theory and Assessment, European Journal of Social Psychology. 35, 565–576. |
| Medication Adherence | Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, Ward HJ: Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2008, 10:348–354. |
| Alcohol Use Disorders Test | Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Saunders J. and Grant M. |
| Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire | Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. (2006) The brief illness perception questionnaire. |
| Smoking Status | Four self-developed questions about quantity of smoking now and in the past. |
| Mediterranean Diet Score | Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Garcia-Arellano A, Toledo E. (2012) A 14-item Mediterranean diet assessment tool and obesity indexes among high risk subjects: The PREDIMED trial. |
| Physical Activity (PACE+) | Murphy MH, Rowe DA, Belton S, Woods CB. (2015) Validity of a two item physical activity questionnaire for assessing attainment of physical activity guidelines in youth. |
| Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale | Ng Fat L, Scholes S, Boniface S, Mindell J, Stewart-Brown S. (2016) Evaluating and establishing national norms for mental well-being using the short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS): findings from the Health Survey for England. |
Overview of main categories for health economics assessment
| Concomitant medications | |
| Travel costs | |
| Time away from employment/main activity | |
| Quality of life | EuroQol-Five Dimensions-Five Levels Questionnaire |