Literature DB >> 28666890

Protection against mosquito vectors Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquefasciatus using a novel insect repellent, ethyl anthranilate.

Johirul Islam1, Kamaruz Zaman2, Varun Tyagi3, Sanjukta Duarah3, Sunil Dhiman4, Pronobesh Chattopadhyay5.   

Abstract

Growing concern on the application of synthetic mosquito repellents in the recent years has instigated the identification and development of better alternatives to control different mosquito-borne diseases. In view of above, present investigation evaluates the repellent activity of ethyl anthranilate (EA), a non-toxic, FDA approved volatile food additive against three known mosquito vectors namely, Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquefasciatus under laboratory conditions following standard protocols. Three concentration levels (2%, 5% and 10% w/v) of EA were tested against all the three selected mosquito species employing K & D module and arm-in-cage method to determine the effective dose (ED50) and complete protection time (CPT), respectively. The repellent activity of EA was further investigated by modified arm-in-cage method to determine the protection over extended spatial ranges against all mosquito species. All behavioural situations were compared with the well-documented repellent N,N-diethylphenyl acetamide (DEPA) as a positive control. The findings demonstrated that EA exhibited significant repellent activity against all the three mosquitoes species. The ED50 values of EA, against Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquefasciatus were found to be 0.96%, 5.4% and 3.6% w/v, respectively. At the concentration of 10% w/v, it provided CPTs of 60, 60 and 30min, respectively, against Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. Again in spatial repellency evaluation, EA was found to be extremely effective in repelling all the three tested species of mosquitoes. Ethyl anthranilate provided comparable results to standard repellent DEPA during the study. Results have concluded that the currently evaluated chemical, EA has potential repellent activity against some well established mosquito vectors. The study emphasizes that repellent activity of EA could be exploited for developing effective, eco-friendly, acceptable and safer alternative to the existing harmful repellents for personal protection against different hematophagous mosquito species.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arbovirus; Dengue; Ethyl anthranilate; Malaria; Mosquito repellent; Zika fever

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28666890     DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


  9 in total

1.  Visual test for the presence of the illegal additive ethyl anthranilate by using a photonic crystal test strip.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Zhenkai Jin; Qingsong Zeng; Yanmei Huang; Hang Gu; Jiahua He; Yangyang Liu; Shili Chen; Hui Sun; Jiaping Lai
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  Methyl N-methylanthranilate: major compound in the defensive secretion of Typhloiulus orpheus (Diplopoda, Julida).

Authors:  Michaela Bodner; Boyan Vagalinski; Slobodan E Makarov; Günther Raspotnig
Journal:  Chemoecology       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 1.725

3.  Soluble expression of recombinant midgut zymogen (native propeptide) proteases from the Aedes aegypti Mosquito Utilizing E. coli as a host.

Authors:  James T Nguyen; Jonathan Fong; Daniel Fong; Timothy Fong; Rachael M Lucero; Jamie M Gallimore; Olive E Burata; Kamille Parungao; Alberto A Rascón
Journal:  BMC Biochem       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.059

4.  Development of a validated RP-HPLC/DAD method for the quantitative determination of methyl jasmonate in an insect repellent semi-solid formulation.

Authors:  Johirul Islam; Saurav Phukan; Pronobesh Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-21

Review 5.  Mosquito-repellent controlled-release formulations for fighting infectious diseases.

Authors:  António B Mapossa; Walter W Focke; Robert K Tewo; René Androsch; Taneshka Kruger
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Cost-effectiveness of malaria elimination in Sampov Loun Operational District, Cambodia.

Authors:  Ir Por; Siv Sovannaroth; Alexander Moran; Lek Dysoley; Sokomar Nguon; Om Bunthy; May Sak Meas; Lawrence Barat; Rida Slot; Sharon Thangadurai; Bryan K Kapella; Saad El-Din Hassan; Ly Po; Sen Sam An; John E Gimnig; Mary McDowell; Michael Thigpen; Jennifer Armistead; Hala Jassim AlMossawi; Soy Ty Kheang; Neeraj Kak
Journal:  Malariaworld J       Date:  2020-04-01

7.  The fabrication and assessment of mosquito repellent cream for outdoor protection.

Authors:  Hemanga Hazarika; Harshita Krishnatreyya; Varun Tyagi; Johirul Islam; Neelutpal Gogoi; Danswrang Goyary; Pronobesh Chattopadhyay; Kamaruz Zaman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mosquito Olfactory Response Ensemble enables pattern discovery by curating a behavioral and electrophysiological response database.

Authors:  Abhishek Gupta; Swikriti S Singh; Aarush M Mittal; Pranjul Singh; Shefali Goyal; Karthikeyan R Kannan; Arjit K Gupta; Nitin Gupta
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-17

9.  Natural Repellents as a Method of Preventing Ant Damage to Microirrigation Systems.

Authors:  Luis de Pedro; Juan Antonio Sanchez
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.139

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.