Literature DB >> 28666601

Impact of a cardiac intensivist on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Soo Jin Na1, Taek Kyu Park2, Ga Yeon Lee2, Yang Hyun Cho3, Chi Ryang Chung1, Kyeongman Jeon4, Gee Young Suh4, Joong Hyun Ahn5, Keumhee C Carriere6, Young Bin Song2, Jin-Oh Choi2, Joo-Yong Hahn2, Seung-Hyuk Choi2, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon2, Jeong Hoon Yang7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the association between high-intensity staffing by a dedicated cardiac intensivist and clinical outcomes in CS.
METHODS: We enrolled 2923 consecutive patients admitted to a cardiac care unit (CCU) from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2015. In January 2013, the CCU changed from a low-intensity to high-intensity staffing unit managed by a dedicated cardiac intensivist. Patients were eligible if they required inotropes or vasopressors to maintain a systolic blood pressure>90mmHg, and had serum lactate≥2.0mmol/L. Eligible patients (n=513) were treated by low-intensity CCU (n=352) or high-intensity CCU (n=161). The primary outcome was CCU mortality.
RESULTS: CCU mortality occurred in 49 patients (30.6%) of the low-intensity group versus 62 patients (17.6%) of the high-intensity group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.75, p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the groups (33.1% vs 24.4%, aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.43-1.29, p=0.29). Among 135 patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the high-intensity model was associated with lower CCU mortality (54.5% vs 22.5%, aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.77, p=0.02) and in-hospital mortality (57.6% vs 29.4%, aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.81, p=0.02).
CONCLUSION: High-intensity staffed CCU managed by a dedicated cardiac intensivist was associated with a significant reduction of CS-related mortality.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac intensivist; Cardiogenic shock; High-intensity staffing; Intensive care unit

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28666601     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

Review 1.  'Combat' Approach to Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Alexander G Truesdell; Behnam Tehrani; Ramesh Singh; Shashank Desai; Patricia Saulino; Scott Barnett; Stephen Lavanier; Charles Murphy
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

2.  Diabetes mellitus, revascularization and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Miquel Gual; Ariza Albert-Solé; Marí Garcaí Maárquez; Cristina Fernández; José L Bernal; Francesc Formiga; María-Isabel Barrionuevo; José C Sánchez-Salado; Victòria Lorente; Júlia Pascual; Isaac Llaó; Oriol Alegre; Angel Cequier; Javier Elola
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Usefulness of Impella support in different clinical settings in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  María Isabel Barrionuevo-Sánchez; Albert Ariza-Solé; Daniel Ortiz-Berbel; José González-Costello; Joan Antoni Gómez-Hospital; Victòria Lorente; Oriol Alegre; Isaac Llaó; José Carlos Sánchez-Salado; Josep Gómez-Lara; Arnau Blasco-Lucas; Josep Comin-Colet
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  External validation and comparison of two delirium prediction models in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sung Eun Kim; Ryoung-Eun Ko; Soo Jin Na; Chi Ryang Chung; Ki Hong Choi; Darae Kim; Taek Kyu Park; Joo Myung Lee; Young Bin Song; Jin-Oh Choi; Joo-Yong Hahn; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Jeong Hoon Yang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.