Literature DB >> 28665773

Implementing and Sustaining Team-Based Telecare for Bipolar Disorder: Lessons Learned from a Model-Guided, Mixed Methods Analysis.

Mark S Bauer1,2, Lois Krawczyk2, Kathy Tuozzo3,4, Cara Frigand1, Sally Holmes1, Christopher J Miller1,2, Erica Abel3, David N Osser2, Aleda Franz3, Cynthia Brandt3, Meghan Rooney5, Jerry Fleming2, Eric Smith1,6, Linda Godleski3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telemental health interventions have empirical support from clinical trials and structured demonstration projects. However, their implementation and sustainability under less structured clinical conditions are not well demonstrated.
INTRODUCTION: We conducted a follow-up analysis of the implementation and sustainability of a clinical video teleconference-based collaborative care model for individuals with bipolar disorder treated in the Department of Veterans Affairs to (a) characterize the extent of implementation and sustainability of the program after its establishment and (b) identify barriers and facilitators to implementation and sustainability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods program evaluation, assessing quantitative aspects of implementation according to the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance implementation framework. We conducted qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with 16 of the providers who submitted consults, utilizing the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in the Health Services implementation framework.
RESULTS: The program demonstrated linear growth in sites (n = 35) and consults (n = 915) from late 2011 through mid-2016. Site-based analysis indicated statistically significant sustainability beyond the first year of operation. Qualitative analysis identified key facilitators, including consult content, ease of use via electronic health record, and national infrastructure. Barriers included availability of telehealth space, equipment, and staff at the sites, as well as the labor-intensive nature of scheduling. DISCUSSION: The program achieved continuous growth over almost 5 years due to (1) successfully filling a need perceived by providers, (2) developing in a supportive context, and (3) receiving effective facilitation by national and local infrastructure.
CONCLUSION: Clinical video teleconference-based interventions, even multicomponent collaborative care interventions for individuals with complex mental health conditions, can grow vigorously under appropriate conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bipolar disorder; chronic care model; collaborative care; implementation; quality; sustainability; sustainment; telehealth

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28665773     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  9 in total

1.  Survey Response Rate and Quality in a Mental Health Clinic Population: Results from a Randomized Survey Comparison.

Authors:  Kelly Stolzmann; Mark Meterko; Christopher J Miller; Lindsay Belanger; Marjorie Nealon Seibert; Mark S Bauer
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Facility and state-level factors associated with telemental health (TMH) adoption among mental health facilities in the United States.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhao; Kim E Innes; Sandipan Bhattacharjee; Nilanjana Dwibedi; Traci M LeMasters; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 6.184

3.  Barriers and facilitators of videoconferencing psychotherapy implementation in veteran mental health care environments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel D Muir; Kathleen de Boer; Maja Nedeljkovic; Denny Meyer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Spread, Scale-up, and Sustainability of Video Consulting in Health Care: Systematic Review and Synthesis Guided by the NASSS Framework.

Authors:  Hannah M James; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Joseph Wherton; Trisha Greenhalgh; Sara E Shaw
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Use of Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine to Access Mental Health Services.

Authors:  Jessica A Hohman; Kathryn A Martinez; Amit Anand; Mark Rood; Trejeeve Martyn; Susannah Rose; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 6.  A systematic review of the literature on telepsychiatry for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Abigail Farrell; Nevita George; Selen Amado; Janet Wozniak
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Rapid Adoption and Implementation of Telehealth Group Psychotherapy During COVID 19: Practical Strategies and Recommendations.

Authors:  Ajeng J Puspitasari; Dagoberto Heredia; Melanie Gentry; Craig Sawchuk; Bernie Theobald; Wendy Moore; Michael Tiede; Christine Galardy; Kathryn Schak; Mayo Clinic
Journal:  Cogn Behav Pract       Date:  2021-06-24

8.  Practical lessons learned for assessing and treating bipolar disorder via telehealth modalities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Claire Burgess; Christopher J Miller; Aleda Franz; Erica A Abel; Laszlo Gyulai; David Osser; Eric G Smith; Samantha L Connolly; Lois Krawczyk; Mark Bauer; Linda Godleski
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.345

9.  Videoconferencing Psychotherapy in the Public Sector: Synthesis and Model for Implementation.

Authors:  Samuel David Muir; Kathleen de Boer; Neil Thomas; Elizabeth Seabrook; Maja Nedeljkovic; Denny Meyer
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2020-01-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.