Literature DB >> 28665062

Metabolic Complications among Korean Patients with HIV Infection: The Korea HIV/AIDS Cohort Study.

Dong Hyun Oh1, Jin Young Ahn1, Sang Il Kim2, Min Ja Kim3, Jun Hee Woo4, Woo Joo Kim3, Ji Hyeon Baek5, Shin Woo Kim6, Bo Youl Choi7,8, Mi Hwa Lee7, Ju Yeon Choi9, Myung Guk Han9, Chun Kang9, June Myung Kim10, Jun Yong Choi11.   

Abstract

Currently, metabolic complications are the most common problem among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, with a high incidence. However, there have been very few studies regarding metabolic abnormalities published in Asia, especially in Korea. This cross-sectional study was performed to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for metabolic abnormalities in 1,096 HIV-infected patients of the Korea HIV/AIDS cohort study enrolled from 19 hospitals between 2006 and 2013. Data at entry to cohort were analyzed. As a result, the median age of the 1,096 enrolled subjects was 46 years, and most patients were men (92.8%). The metabolic profiles of the patients were as follows: median weight was 63.8 kg, median body mass index (BMI) was 22.2 kg/m², and 16.4% of the patients had a BMI over 25 kg/m². A total of 5.5% of the patients had abdominal obesity (waist/hip ratio ≥ 1 in men, ≥ 0.85 in women). Increased levels of fasting glucose, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides were present in 10.4%, 6.0%, 5.5%, and 32.1% of the patients. Decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were observed in 44.2% of the patients. High systolic blood pressure was present in 14.3% of the patients. In multivariate analysis, high BMI and the use of protease inhibitors (PIs) were risk factors for dyslipidemia in HIV-infected patients. In conclusion, proper diagnosis and management should be offered for the prevalent metabolic complications of Korean HIV-infected patients. Further studies on risk factors for metabolic complications are needed.
© 2017 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dyslipidemia; HIV Infection; Metabolic Complication; Protease Inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28665062      PMCID: PMC5494325          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


INTRODUCTION

The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection changed the characteristics of HIV infection, from a fatal disease to a chronic manageable infectious disease (1). However, as the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients increased, lifestyle-related comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, and hyperlipidemia began to emerge as a problematic issue and challenge in the treatment of HIV infection. Furthermore, antiretroviral drugs have the potential to induce many adverse drug reactions as well as drug-drug interactions with medications administered for the treatment of other comorbidities (2). Long-term metabolic complications induced by antiretroviral drugs include osteoporosis, lipodystrophy, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome, among others. These complications may be risk factors for cerebral vascular disease and coronary artery disease, and may contribute to the morbidity and mortality of these diseases. Recent studies have reported a higher prevalence of these diseases in HIV-infected patients than in the general population (34). Differences in the prevalence of these long-term metabolic complications have been observed across previous studies, because each of the studies was performed in a different population and used different diagnostic criteria (5). Choe et al. (6) published a study evaluating the incidence of metabolic complications in a Korean population of HIV-infected patients in 2004. The study analyzed 66 HIV-infected patients and found an incidence of metabolic complications of 20.3%. In detail, the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, hyperglycemia, and diabetes was 12.3%, 5.8%, 1.4%, and 4.3%, respectively. To date, several studies have investigated the prevalence of metabolic complications in HIV-infected patients in Korea. However, these studies were limited by small sample sizes, and each study did not analyze metabolic parameters comprehensively (67891011). The purpose of the present study was to identify the prevalence of and evaluate the risk factors for metabolic complications in HIV-infected patients in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population and design

Participants in this prospective cross-sectional study were HIV-infected subjects who visited 19 hospitals affiliated with the Korean HIV/AIDS Cohort from December 2006 to July 2013. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each of the participating hospitals. All participants were older than 18 years and provided informed consent prior to enrollment. Data at entry to cohort were used for analyses. The prevalence of metabolic abnormalities was calculated, and the rates of metabolic abnormalities were compared with data reported for the general population. The rates of metabolic abnormalities were compared between treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced subjects. In addition, a case-control study was performed to identify risk factors for dyslipidemia.

Data collection

Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained for all participants. Biologic data such as age, sex, race, body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist/hip ratio, and blood pressure were collected. Regarding comorbidities, history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, CVD, smoking history, and family history were collected. In terms of history related to HIV infection, sexual habits, history of exposure route of HIV, time of entry to cohort, time of diagnosis, clinical classification guided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, baseline CD4+ T-cell counts, baseline HIV viral loads, antiviral treatment status, and antiretroviral regimen were collected. Laboratory data related to metabolic complications such as fasting glucose, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and triglycerides were evaluated. To assess cardiovascular risk, the Framingham risk score (FRS) was calculated (12).

Definitions

Hyperglycemia is defined as serum fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL (13). Hypercholesterolemia is defined as serum total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL. Hypoalphalipoproteinemia is defined as serum HDL-cholesterol < 40 mg/dL. Hyper LDL-cholesterolemia is defined as serum LDL-cholesterol ≥ 160 mg/dL. Hypertriglyceridemia is defined as serum triglycerides ≥ 200 mg/dL (14). High and low BMI are defined as BMI > 25 and < 18.5, respectively (15). Dyslipidemia was defined as the presence of one or more of hypercholesterolemia, hyper LDL-cholesterolemia, hypoalphalipoproteinemia, and hypertriglyceridemia (16). Lipodystrophy was defined as the presence of peripheral lipoatrophy or central fat accumulation subjectively measured by standardized physical examination procedure (17). The FRS is the most commonly used tool for prediction of cardiovascular risk, and is calculated using variables including age, sex, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, hypertension, hypertension treatment, diabetes mellitus, and current smoking. Subjects were classified as having a very low, low, moderate, or high 10-year coronary risk in accordance with the Framingham equation (< 10%, 10%–15%, 16%–20%, and > 20%, respectively) (18).

Data analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean or median (interquartile range) and compared using Student's t-test if the variables followed a normal distribution. Continuous variables with skewed distribution were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test. Variables with a P value less than 0.05 on univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression model for multivariate analysis for predicting risk factors for dyslipidemia. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Yonsei University Health System Clinical Trial Center and proceeded with getting informed consent from all patients participating in the study (Study No. 4-2006-0158).

RESULTS

A total of 1,096 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study. The median age of participants was 46 years, and the proportion of men was 92.8%. Almost all participants were Korean (99.1%), and the most frequent exposure route of HIV infection was sexual contact (87%). The proportion of intravenous drug use was 0.4%. The median baseline CD4+ T-cell count of participants was 235 cells/μL, and the proportion of treatment-naïve patients was 35.5%. The most commonly used antiretroviral regimen was a protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen (40.4%) (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of HIV-infected patients in this study

VariablesHIV-infected patients (n = 1,096)
Age at entry to cohort, yr
 Median (range)46 (20–83)
 20–2996 (8.8)
 30–39266 (24.3)
 40–49325 (29.7)
 50–59260 (23.7)
 ≥ 60149 (13.6)
Sex
 Male1,017 (92.8)
Race
 Korean1,086 (99.1)
 Asian10 (0.9)
Reported exposure category
 Sexual contact953 (87.0)
 Reception of blood/product25 (2.3)
 IDU4 (0.4)
 Other61 (5.6)
Sexual habit
 Homosexual353/958 (36.8)
 Heterosexual368/958 (44.6)
 Bisexual83/958 (8.6)
 Other154/958 (16.0)
First year diagnosed with HIV
 Before 19914/1,029 (0.4)
 1991–199519/1,029 (1.8)
 1996–200050/1,029 (4.9)
 2001–2005276/1,029 (26.8)
 2006–2010560/1,029 (54.4)
 After 2010120/1,029 (11.7)
CDC clinical classification for HIV infection
 Category A398/1,095 (36.5)
 Category B286/1,095 (26.1)
 Category C311/1,095 (28.4)
Baseline CD4+ T-cell count, cells/µL
 Median (range)235 (1–1,699)
 < 50198/750 (26.4)
 50–199186/750 (24.8)
 200–499278/750 (37.1)
 ≥ 50088/750 (11.7)
Baseline HIV viral loads, copies/mL
 Median (range)3.9 × 105 (0–7.5 × 107)
 Not detected33/745 (4.4)
 < 400333/745 (44.7)
 400–9,99957/745 (7.7)
 10,000–99,999146/745 (19.6)
 ≥ 100,000176/745 (23.6)
Treatment
 Treatment-naïve387/1,091 (35.5)
 Treatment-experienced704/1,091 (64.5)
Antiretroviral treatment at entry to cohort
 Not on treatment416/1,084 (38.4)
 2 NRTIs + PI438/1,084 (40.4)
 2 NRTIs + NNRTI196/1,084 (18.1)
 2 NRTIs + II7/1,084 (0.6)
 3 NRTIs1/1,084 (0.1)
 Combinations without NRTIs4/1,084 (0.4)
 Other22/1,084 (2.0)

HIV = human immunodeficiency virus, IDU = intravenous drug use, CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NRTI = nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, PI = protease inhibitor, NNRTI = non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, II = integrase inhibitor.

HIV = human immunodeficiency virus, IDU = intravenous drug use, CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NRTI = nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, PI = protease inhibitor, NNRTI = non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, II = integrase inhibitor. The prevalence of metabolic complications in all HIV-infected patients in the cohort was as follows. The prevalence of obesity based on BMI, obesity based on waist/hip ratio (waist/hip ratio ≥ 1 in men, ≥ 0.85 in women), hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, hypoalphalipoproteinemia, hyper LDL-cholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia were 16.4%, 19.0%, 10.4%, 6.0%, 44.2%, 5.5%, and 32.1%, respectively (Table 1). Among metabolic parameters, median serum total cholesterol (155 [48-297] vs. 176 [11-364] mg/dL; P < 0.001), HDL-cholesterol (38 [4-137] vs. 45 [10-177] mg/dL; P < 0.001), and triglycerides (155 [14-636] vs. 202 [18-1,040] mg/dL; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in treatment-experienced patients (Table 2). Additionally, the proportion of hypercholesterolemia (2.7% vs. 7.7%; P = 0.008) and hypertriglyceridemia (23.7% vs. 37.2%; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in treatment-experienced patients than in treatment naïve patients. Other metabolic parameters did not show statistically significant differences between the 2 patient groups.
Table 2

Comparisons of metabolic parameters between treatment-naïve patients and treatment-experienced patients

VariablesTotal (n = 1,091)Treatment-naïve (n = 387)Treatment-experienced (n = 704)P value
Weight, kg
 Median (range)63.8 (36.4–122.5)64.4 (39–107)63.4 (36.4–122.5)0.190*
BMI, kg/m2
 Median (range)22.2 (14.5–37.8)22.2 (14.8–33.8)22.14 (14.5–37.8)0.817*
 > 25140/856 (16.4)56/318 (17.6)84/537 (15.6)0.452
WC, cm
 Median (range)82.0 (60.0–120.0)81.2 (65–118)82.4 (60.0–120.0)0.176*
 Abdominal obesity85/447 (19.0)28/154 (18.2)57/293 (19.5)0.745
Waist/hip ratio
 Median (range)0.87 (0.71–1.21)0.87 (0.73–1.21)0.88 (0.71–1.16)0.160*
 Abdominal obesity23/417 (5.5)7/146 (4.8)16/273 (5.9)0.648
Fasting glucose, mg/dL
 Median (range)103 (62–432)101 (62–346)104 (64–432)0.240*
 ≥ 12682/787 (10.4)22/265 (8.3)60/522 (11.5)0.166
Total cholesterol, mg/dL
 Median (range)169 (11–364)155 (48–297)176 (11–364)< 0.001*
 ≥ 28012/997 (1.2)2/332 (0.6)10/663 (1.5)0.008
 240–27948/997 (4.8)7/332 (2.1)41/663 (6.2)-
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL
 Median (range)43 (4–177)38 (4–137)45 (10–177)< 0.001*
 < 40337/763 (44.2)148/254 (58.3)189/507 (37.3)< 0.001
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL
 Median (range)101 (10–1,236)98 (10–623)103 (11–1,236)0.313*
 ≥ 19013/688 (1.9)3/230 (1.3)10/455 (2.2)0.593
 160–18925/688 (3.6)7/230 (3.0)18/455 (4.0)-
Triglycerides, mg/dL
 Median (range)186 (14–1,040)155 (14–636)202 (18–1,040)< 0.001*
 ≥ 50027/872 (2.5)2/279 (0.7)25/589 (4.2)< 0.001
 200–499258/872 (29.6)64/279 (22.9)194/589 (32.9)-
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg
 Median (range)124 (82–205)123 (82–173)125 (90–205)0.102*
 > 16021/742 (2.8)8/251 (3.2)13/491 (2.6)0.191
 140–15997/742 (11.5)22/251 (8.8)65/491 (13.2)-
Smoking history649/1,044 (62.2)238/366 (64.9)410/676 (60.4)0.239
 Current smoking466/1,044 (44.6)191/366 (52.2)274/676 (40.5)
Underlying disease
 Hypertension112/1,087 (10.3)37/383 (9.7)75/690 (10.9)0.535
  On antihypertensive treatment97/1,087 (8.9)33/383 (8.6)64/690 (9.3)
 Dyslipidemia96/1,081 (8.9)10/382 (2.6)86/686 (12.4)< 0.001
  On dyslipidemia treatment80/1,081 (7.4)8/382 (2.1)72/686 (10.5)
 Diabetes mellitus71/1,088 (6.5)23/383 (6.0)48/691 (6.9)0.552
  On diabetes treatment68/1,088 (6.2)23/383 (6.0)45/691 (6.5)
 Lipodystrophy28/1,089 (2.6)0/385 (0)28/693 (4.0)< 0.001
 CVD
  Angina pectoris3/1,064 (0.3)0/381 (0)3/678 (0.4)0.299
  Myocardial infarction3/1,064 (0.3)0/381 (0)3/678 (0.4)0.165
  Stroke12/1,064 (1.1)5/381 (1.3)8/678 (1.2)0.295
Family history
 Hypertension262/1,093 (23.9)87/386 (22.5)175/704 (24.9)0.525
 Diabetes mellitus213/1,093 (19.5)67/386 (17.4)146/704 (20.7)0.308
 Dyslipidemia12/1,093 (1.1)2/386 (0.5)10/704 (1.4)0.223
 Ischemic heart disease43/1,093 (3.9)10/386 (2.6)33/704(4.7)0.167
FRS
 Median7.13 (0–31)6.61 (0–31)7.4 (0–31)0.194*
 Low risk409/558 (87.3)147/192 (76.6)262/366 (71.6)0.419
 Moderate risk122/588 (11.1)36/192 (18.8)86/366 (23.5)-
 High risk27/558 (2.5)9/192 (4.7)18/366 (4.9)-

The data were expressed as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage).

BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, HDL = high-density lipoprotein, LDL = low-density lipoprotein, CVD = cardiovascular disease, FRS = Framingham risk score.

*Mann-Whitney U-test, median (interquartile range); †Pearson's χ2-test.

The data were expressed as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage). BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, HDL = high-density lipoprotein, LDL = low-density lipoprotein, CVD = cardiovascular disease, FRS = Framingham risk score. *Mann-Whitney U-test, median (interquartile range); †Pearson's χ2-test. To analyze the risk factors for dyslipidemia in HIV-infected patients, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Comparison of the patient group without dyslipidemia and the patient group with dyslipidemia showed that the dyslipidemia group had older age (47.1 vs. 44.5 years; P = 0.005), higher proportion of high CD4+ T-cell counts (P = 0.010) and low HIV viral loads (P < 0.001); higher proportion of PI-based regimen (64.0% vs. 47.9%; P < 0.001); higher BMI (23.42 vs. 21.76 kg/m2; P = 0.001); larger WC (85.2 vs. 79.7 cm; P < 0.001); and higher rate of obesity (9.0% vs. 2.8%; P = 0.014) and high systolic blood pressure (21.3% vs. 12.2%; P = 0.006) than the group without dyslipidemia. However, high BMI (odds ratio [OR], 6.839; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.673–17.495; P < 0.001) and the use of PI-based regimen (OR, 2.868; 95% CI, 1.419–5.797; P = 0.003) were significant risk factors for dyslipidemia in multivariate analysis (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison and multivariate analysis of risk factors for dyslipidemia in HIV-infected patients

VariablesPatients without dyslipidemia (n = 433)Patients with dyslipidemia (n = 247)P valueOR (95% CI); P value
Age, yr44.5 (20–82)47.1 (25–81)0.005*-
Male408/433 (94.2)230/247 (93.1)0.563-
Race
 Korean428/433 (98.8)246/247 (99.6)0.315-
 Asian5/433 (1.2)1/247 (0.4)--
CD4+ cell counts, cells/µL225 (1–1,584)261 (2–1,699)0.105*
 < 5019/349 (5.4)2/216 (0.9)0.010-
 50–19964/349 (18.3)37/216 (17.1)--
 200–499182/349 (52.1)106/216 (49.1)--
 ≥ 50084/349 (24.1)71/216 (32.9)--
HIV viral loads, copies/mL4.24 × 1053.07 × 1050.731
 Not detected17/339 (5.0)21/210 (10.0)< 0.001-
 < 400152/339 (44.8)122/210 (58.1)--
 400–9,99954/339 (15.9)25/210 (11.9)--
 10,000–99,99972/339 (21.2)22/210 (10.5)--
 > 100,00044/339 (13.0)20/210 (9.5)--
HAART regimen
 PI treatment198/413 (47.9)153/239 (64.0)< 0.0012.868 (1.419–5.797)§; 0.003
 NNRTI treatment212/424 (28.5)79/247 (32.0)0.347-
Smoking263/417 (63.1)152/236 (64.4)0.931-
BMI, kg/m221.76 (15.20–31.74)23.42 (16.40–37.80)< 0.001*
 > 2554/366 (14.8)55/210 (26.2)0.0016.839 (2.673–17.495)§; < 0.001
WC, cm79.7 (60–107)85.2 (68–120)< 0.001*-
Obesity (waist/hip ratio)6/211 (2.8)11/122 (9.0)0.014-
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg122 (92–181)128 (95–205)0.001*
 > 14040/327 (12.2)42/197 (21.3)0.006-
Fasting glucose, mg/dL102 (62–432)107 (70–358)0.060*
 ≥ 12628/349 (8.0)29/200 (14.5)0.017-
FRS5.81 (0–31)9.05 (0–31)< 0.001*
 Low risk255/320 (79.7)123/190 (64.7)< 0.001-
 Intermediate to high risk65/320 (20.3)67/190 (35.3)--

The data were expressed as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage) or mean.

HIV = human immunodeficiency virus, OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, HAART = highly active antiretroviral therapy, PI = protease inhibitor, NNRTI = non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, FRS = Framingham risk score.

*Mann-Whitney U-test, median (interquartile range); †Pearson's χ2-test; ‡Student's t-test; §Logistic regression analysis.

The data were expressed as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage) or mean. HIV = human immunodeficiency virus, OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, HAART = highly active antiretroviral therapy, PI = protease inhibitor, NNRTI = non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, FRS = Framingham risk score. *Mann-Whitney U-test, median (interquartile range); †Pearson's χ2-test; ‡Student's t-test; §Logistic regression analysis.

DISCUSSION

As the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients is increasing, metabolic complications are emerging as an issue of concern in managing HIV infections. This study evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of metabolic complications in HIV-infected Koreans. As mentioned above, the prevalence of obesity based on BMI, obesity based on waist/hip ratio, hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, hypoalphalipoproteinemia, hyper LDL-cholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia were 16.4%, 19.0%, 10.4%, 6.0%, 44.2%, 5.5%, and 32.1%, respectively. These results are similar to the findings of a recent study conducted in an Asian population (19), but, compared to a previous Korean study (6), the prevalence of metabolic complications was relatively high. This difference seems to be the result of the difference in the study period between our study and the former study. Over a decade, there have been many changes in treatment trends; therefore, characteristics of HIV-infected patients have changed. When comparing the metabolic parameters between patient groups depending on the presence or absence of antiretroviral treatment, median total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were high among patients who received antiretroviral therapy. Furthermore, the prevalence of dyslipidemia and lipodystrophy among comorbidities were also significantly high in the patients receiving antiretroviral treatment. This result is similar to previous study findings. Jantarapakde et al. (19) reported a higher prevalence of lipodystrophy and median total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides in patients who had received antiretroviral therapy. Moreover, increases in mean total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were observed as the duration of antiretroviral therapy increased in previous studies in Asian patients (2021). Therefore, in consideration of these studies, it can be presumed that antiretroviral therapy influenced the prevalence of metabolic complications. This is thought to be the result of the combination of the catabolic characteristics of HIV infection, lipodystrophy due to antiretroviral treatment, and the effects on metabolic profiles of antiretroviral therapy. In this cohort, 38.4% of the patients were not undergoing treatment for HIV infection at entry into the cohort, but some antiretroviral regimens such as PIs could cause dyslipidemia. In comparison of the patient groups depending on the presence or absence of dyslipidemia, high BMI and the use of a PI-based regimen as antiretroviral therapy were significant risk factors for dyslipidemia on multivariate analysis. BMI is associated with the prevalence of dyslipidemia; and a Japanese study conducted by Ishikawa-Takata et al. (22) showed Japanese had a higher prevalence of dyslipidemia than Caucasian, even with low BMI. Since this study was also conducted on Asian, the results can also be referred to the Japanese study. The association between metabolic syndrome and PI exposure was frequently mentioned in previous studies (2324). In addition, dyslipidemia might be associated with lipodystrophy in HIV-infected patients. Fat accumulation, a type of lipodystrophy, can be induced by PI treatment (25). However, the results of a recently reported randomized controlled study indicated that there was no difference in the appearance of fat accumulation between treatment with PIs and other classes of antiretroviral drugs (26). In our cohort, other classes of antiretroviral drug such as non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) did not show a significant correlation with the appearance of dyslipidemia. However, because about 40% of HIV-infected patients were receiving PI-based regimens, and the percentage of those receiving ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (22.1%), which is well known to induce dyslipidemia, was relatively high, the difference between the previous study and this study can be explained through this factor (data not shown). CVD is an important predictor of mortality in the general population, and dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for the occurrence of CVD (27). In a previous cohort study of 4,061 patients, dyslipidemia in HIV-infected patients was found to be a major risk factor for CVD (28). Therefore, dyslipidemia caused by HIV infection and antiretroviral agents increases long-term mortality by increasing the risk of CVD. Additionally, HIV infection itself is a risk factor for the development of CVD (3). This study has some limitations. First, the number of patients was small, and it limits our study results. Second, because of the cross-sectional design of this study, we could not evaluate the incidence of and associated factors for metabolic complications. Third, the distribution of antiretroviral regimens was not even because of the observational study design. Additionally, because we analyzed data from 2006 to 2013, this study could not reflect the current situation of Korea. Especially, single tablet regimens with integrase strand transfer inhibitor are introduced into Korea in 2014, and HAART regimens including integrase strand transfer inhibitor are more commonly used. That might change the prevalence of metabolic complications in Korea since 2014. Finally, there were significant missing values for some important variables such as FRS, smoking history, and so on. In conclusion, HIV-infected Koreans had higher serum triglyceride levels compared to the general population; however, the prevalence of other metabolic abnormalities was not high. Analysis of patient groups based on the presence or absence of dyslipidemia revealed that antiretroviral therapy contributed to abnormality of lipid profiles; in particular, high BMI and the use of a PI-based regimen were statistically significant risk factor in multivariate analysis. To improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes in HIV-infected Koreans, clinicians should be vigilant regarding the proper management of metabolic abnormalities in these patients.
  26 in total

1.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among HIV patients.

Authors:  Carmine Gazzaruso; Paolo Sacchi; Adriana Garzaniti; Pietro Fratino; Raffaele Bruno; Gaetano Filice
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Screening for Lipid Disorders in Children and Adolescents: Recommendation Statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  Metabolic syndrome among HIV-infected Taiwanese patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: prevalence and associated factors.

Authors:  Pei-Ying Wu; Chien-Ching Hung; Wen-Chun Liu; Chia-Yin Hsieh; Hsin-Yun Sun; Ching-Lan Lu; Hsiu Wu; Kuo-Liong Chien
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Recognition and management of significant drug interactions in HIV patients: challenges in using available data to guide therapy.

Authors:  A K Pau; S D Boyd
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  A syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia and insulin resistance in patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors.

Authors:  A Carr; K Samaras; S Burton; M Law; J Freund; D J Chisholm; D A Cooper
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1998-05-07       Impact factor: 4.177

8.  Body Composition Changes After Initiation of Raltegravir or Protease Inhibitors: ACTG A5260s.

Authors:  Grace A McComsey; Carlee Moser; Judith Currier; Heather J Ribaudo; Pawel Paczuski; Michael P Dubé; Theodoros Kelesidis; Jennifer Rothenberg; James H Stein; Todd T Brown
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Serum retinol-binding protein 4 correlates with obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia in HIV-infected subjects receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Han; Bum Sik Chin; Han Sung Lee; Su Jin Jeong; Hee Kyoung Choi; Chang Oh Kim; Jun Yong Choi; Young Goo Song; Hyun Chul Lee; June Myung Kim
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 8.694

10.  Obesity, weight change and risks for hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolemia in Japanese men.

Authors:  K Ishikawa-Takata; T Ohta; K Moritaki; T Gotou; S Inoue
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  10 in total

1.  Diabetes, mortality and glucose monitoring rates in the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database Low Intensity Transfer (TAHOD-LITE) study.

Authors:  R Bijker; N Kumarasamy; S Kiertiburanakul; S Pujari; L Penh Sun; O T Ng; M P Lee; J Y Choi; K V Nguyen; Y J Chan; T P Merati; C D Do; J Ross; M Law
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.180

2.  Dyslipidemia and Associated Factors Among Adult Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy in Armed Force Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Adnan Kemal; Melese Sinaga Teshome; Kalkidan Hassen Abate; Mohammed Ahmed; Meseret Molla; Tabarak Malik; Jemmal Mohammed
Journal:  HIV AIDS (Auckl)       Date:  2020-07-02

Review 3.  Prevalence of cardiometabolic syndrome in HIV-infected persons: a systematic review.

Authors:  Minyahil Woldu; Omary Minzi; Ephrem Engidawork
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2020-06-09

4.  Korea HIV/AIDS Cohort Study: study design and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Bo Youl Choi; Jun Yong Choi; Sang Hoon Han; Sang Il Kim; Mee-Kyung Kee; Min Ja Kim; Shin-Woo Kim; Sung Soon Kim; Yu-Mi Kim; Nam Su Ku; Jin-Soo Lee; Joo-Shil Lee; Yunsu Choi; Kyong Sil Park; Joon Young Song; Jun Hee Woo; Moon Won Kang; June Kim
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2018-06-06

5.  Estimation of the Number of HIV Infections and Time to Diagnosis in the Korea.

Authors:  Eunyoung Lee; Jungmee Kim; Jin Yong Lee; Ji Hwan Bang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 6.  History of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome in Korea.

Authors:  June Myung Kim; Nam Joong Kim; Jun Yong Choi; Bum Sik Chin
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2020-06

Review 7.  Weight Gain and Metabolic Syndrome in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patients.

Authors:  Hyun-Ha Chang
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2022-05-31

8.  Renal Disease in Persons Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Korea.

Authors:  Pyoeng Gyun Choe
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2017-09

Review 9.  HIV, Antiretroviral Therapy and Metabolic Alterations: A Review.

Authors:  Huseyin Ekin Ergin; Evelyn E Inga; Tun Zan Maung; Mehwish Javed; Safeera Khan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-11

10.  Hypertension Risk with Abacavir Use among HIV-Infected Individuals: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jungmee Kim; Ji Hwan Bang; Ju Young Shin; Bo Ram Yang; Joongyub Lee; Byung Joo Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.759

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.