Literature DB >> 28664980

Experimental test of genetic rescue in isolated populations of brook trout.

Zachary L Robinson1, Jason A Coombs2, Mark Hudy3, Keith H Nislow2, Benjamin H Letcher4, Andrew R Whiteley1.   

Abstract

Genetic rescue is an increasingly considered conservation measure to address genetic erosion associated with habitat loss and fragmentation. The resulting gene flow from facilitating migration may improve fitness and adaptive potential, but is not without risks (e.g., outbreeding depression). Here, we conducted a test of genetic rescue by translocating ten (five of each sex) brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) from a single source to four nearby and isolated stream populations. To control for the demographic contribution of translocated individuals, ten resident individuals (five of each sex) were removed from each recipient population. Prior to the introduction of translocated individuals, the two smallest above-barrier populations had substantially lower genetic diversity, and all populations had reduced effective number of breeders relative to adjacent below-barrier populations. In the first reproductive bout following translocation, 31 of 40 (78%) translocated individuals reproduced successfully. Translocated individuals contributed to more families than expected under random mating and generally produced larger full-sibling families. We observed relatively high (>20%) introgression in three of the four recipient populations. The translocations increased genetic diversity of recipient populations by 45% in allelic richness and 25% in expected heterozygosity. Additionally, strong evidence of hybrid vigour was observed through significantly larger body sizes of hybrid offspring relative to resident offspring in all recipient populations. Continued monitoring of these populations will test for negative fitness effects beyond the first generation. However, these results provide much-needed experimental data to inform the potential effectiveness of genetic rescue-motivated translocations.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brook trout; extinction vortex; genetic rescue; habitat fragmentation; inbreeding

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28664980     DOI: 10.1111/mec.14225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  8 in total

1.  Genetic rescue in an inbred Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) population.

Authors:  Malin Hasselgren; Anders Angerbjörn; Nina E Eide; Rasmus Erlandsson; Øystein Flagstad; Arild Landa; Johan Wallén; Karin Norén
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Does gene flow aggravate or alleviate maladaptation to environmental stress in small populations?

Authors:  Sarah W Fitzpatrick; Brendan N Reid
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  The Laboratory Domestication of Zebrafish: From Diverse Populations to Inbred Substrains.

Authors:  Jaanus Suurväli; Andrew R Whiteley; Yichen Zheng; Karim Gharbi; Maria Leptin; Thomas Wiehe
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Recent evolutionary history predicts population but not ecosystem-level patterns.

Authors:  Madison L Miller; John A Kronenberger; Sarah W Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Using Reciprocal Transplants to Assess Local Adaptation, Genetic Rescue, and Sexual Selection in Newly Established Populations.

Authors:  Jacques Labonne; Aurélie Manicki; Louise Chevalier; Marin Tétillon; François Guéraud; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Genomic insights into the conservation status of the world's last remaining Sumatran rhinoceros populations.

Authors:  Johanna von Seth; Nicolas Dussex; David Díez-Del-Molino; Tom van der Valk; Verena E Kutschera; Marcin Kierczak; Cynthia C Steiner; Shanlin Liu; M Thomas P Gilbert; Mikkel-Holger S Sinding; Stefan Prost; Katerina Guschanski; Senthilvel K S S Nathan; Selina Brace; Yvonne L Chan; Christopher W Wheat; Pontus Skoglund; Oliver A Ryder; Benoit Goossens; Anders Götherström; Love Dalén
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Fitness consequences of targeted gene flow to counter impacts of drying climates on terrestrial-breeding frogs.

Authors:  Tabitha S Rudin-Bitterli; Jonathan P Evans; Nicola J Mitchell
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-10-18

8.  Population genomic monitoring provides insight into conservation status but no correlation with demographic estimates of extinction risk in a threatened trout.

Authors:  William Hemstrom; Daniel Dauwalter; Mary M Peacock; Douglas Leasure; Seth Wenger; Michael R Miller; Helen Neville
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.929

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.