Literature DB >> 28664426

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery is a feasible treatment procedure for intraluminal gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors compared to endoscopic intragastric surgery.

Toshiyasu Ojima1, Masaki Nakamura1, Mikihito Nakamori1, Katsunari Takifuji1, Keiji Hayata1, Masahiro Katsuda1, Yoh Takei1, Hiroki Yamaue2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic wedge resection of the stomach is an ideal procedure if the gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are located in the extraluminal stomach. When the tumor is located in the intraluminal stomach, two minimally invasive surgical procedures involving laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) or endoscopic intragastric surgery (EIGS) are frequently performed. To date, there have been no comparative studies of LECS and EIGS in patients with intraluminal gastric GISTs regarding short-term and long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and feasibility of LECS and EIGS in patients with intraluminal gastric GISTs.
METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of 46 consecutive patients with intraluminal gastric GISTs who underwent minimally invasive surgery. LECS (n = 21) was performed between 2013 and 2015 and EIGS (n = 26) was performed between 2001 and 2013.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of perioperative complications was significantly higher in the EIGS group than in the LECS group (40 vs 4.8%; P = 0.006). In the EIGS group, three patients with intraoperative gastric mucosal injury were followed-up throughout surgical repair (12%). An esophageal tear was found in one patient during oral removal of tumor (4%). Postoperative gastric hemorrhage occurred in three patients (12%) and superficial surgical site infection was observed in three patients (12%). In the LECS group, anastomotic leakage requiring additional drainage was observed in one patient (4.8%). EIGS had less favorable results regarding median time to resumption of first oral intake (2 vs 1 days; P = 0.005). Two of 46 patients (4.3%), including one patient who underwent LECS and one patient who underwent EIGS developed recurrence. No cause-specific deaths were observed.
CONCLUSION: LECS is a feasible and safe procedure for intraluminal gastric GISTs with regard to both short-term surgical and long-term oncological outcomes. Registration number: UMIN000026631.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic intragastric surgery; Gastrointestinal stromal tumors; Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery; Minimally invasive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28664426     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5683-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival.

Authors:  R P DeMatteo; J J Lewis; D Leung; S S Mudan; J M Woodruff; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Minimally invasive surgery for gastric stromal cell tumors: intermediate follow-up results.

Authors:  I-Rue Lai; Wei-Jei Lee; Sen-Chang Yu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Surgical management of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach.

Authors:  Makoto Iwahashi; Katsunari Takifuji; Toshiyasu Ojima; Masaki Nakamura; Mikihito Nakamori; Yoshihiro Nakatani; Kentaro Ueda; Koichiro Ishida; Teiji Naka; Kazuo Ono; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Intragastric approach for submucosal tumors located near the Z-line: a hybrid laparoscopic and endoscopic technique.

Authors:  Jung Ho Shim; Han Hong Lee; Han Mo Yoo; Hae Myung Jeon; Cho Hyun Park; Jun Gi Kim; Kyo Young Song
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Yuri W Novitsky; Kent W Kercher; Ronald F Sing; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Various features of laparoscopic tailored resection for gastric submucosal tumors: a single institution's results for 168 patients.

Authors:  Chang In Choi; Si Hak Lee; Sun Hwi Hwang; Dae Hwan Kim; Tae Yong Jeon; Dong Heon Kim; Do Youn Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu; Aki Vehtari; Jaakko Riihimäki; Toshirou Nishida; Sonja E Steigen; Peter Brabec; Lukas Plank; Bengt Nilsson; Claudia Cirilli; Chiara Braconi; Andrea Bordoni; Magnus K Magnusson; Zdenek Linke; Jozef Sufliarsky; Massimo Federico; Jon G Jonasson; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach.

Authors:  Mikihito Nakamori; Makoto Iwahashi; Masaki Nakamura; Katsuyoshi Tabuse; Kazunari Mori; Katsutoshi Taniguchi; Yozo Aoki; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Combined endoscopic/laparoscopic intragastric resection of gastric stromal tumors.

Authors:  R Matthew Walsh; Jeffrey Ponsky; Fred Brody; Brent D Matthews; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Low-Risk Tumors of the Duodenum.

Authors:  Toshiyasu Ojima; Mikihito Nakamori; Masaki Nakamura; Keiji Hayata; Masahiro Katsuda; Katsunari Takifuji; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Yuyong Tan; Linna Tan; Jiaxi Lu; Jirong Huo; Deliang Liu
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-19

3.  Surgical Resection Is Still Better Than Endoscopic Resection for Patients With 2-5 cm Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Han Li; Qinfeng Xu; Liang Shang; Ronghua Zhang; Chen Li; Mengdi Fu; Wandi Xu; Jianfeng Chen; Jin Liu; Leping Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric tumors: Perspective for actual practice and oncological benefits.

Authors:  Yuki Aisu; Daiki Yasukawa; Yusuke Kimura; Tomohide Hori
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-11-15

5.  Clinical feasibility and safety of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors dissection : A new surgical technique for treating gastric GISTs.

Authors:  Feiyu Shi; Yingchao Li; Yanglin Pan; Qi Sun; Guanghui Wang; Tianyu Yu; Chengxin Shi; Yaguang Li; Hongping Xia; Junjun She
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection for treating small tumors originating from the muscularis propria in the gastric fundus: An improvement in technique over 15 years.

Authors:  Nan Ge; Jin-Long Hu; Fei Yang; Fan Yang; Si-Yu Sun
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-11-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.