Literature DB >> 28664243

Optimal go/no-go ratios to maximize false alarms.

Michael E Young1, Steven C Sutherland2, Anthony W McCoy3.   

Abstract

Despite the ubiquity of go/no-go tasks in the study of behavioral inhibition, there is a lack of evidence regarding the impact of key design characteristics, including the go/no-go ratio, intertrial interval, and number of types of go stimuli, on the production of different response classes of central interest. In the present study we sought to empirically determine the optimal conditions to maximize the production of a rare outcome of considerable interest to researchers: false alarms. As predicted, the shortest intertrial intervals (450 ms), intermediate go/no-go ratios (2:1 to 4:1), and the use of multiple types of go stimuli produced the greatest numbers of false alarms. These results are placed within the context of behavioral changes during learning.

Keywords:  EEG; Inhibition; Optimal design; Self-control; Signal detection theory; go/no-go

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28664243     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0923-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  14 in total

1.  Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2019-03-29

2.  Selective enhancement of neural coding in V1 underlies fine-discrimination learning in tree shrew.

Authors:  Joseph W Schumacher; Matthew K McCann; Katherine J Maximov; David Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 10.900

3.  Time-frequency dynamics of error monitoring in childhood: An EEG study.

Authors:  Santiago Morales; Maureen E Bowers; Stephanie C Leach; George A Buzzell; William Fifer; Amy J Elliott; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.531

4.  Processing of Task-Irrelevant Race Information is Associated with Diminished Cognitive Control in Black and White Individuals.

Authors:  Estée Rubien-Thomas; Nia Berrian; Alessandra Cervera; Binyam Nardos; Alexandra O Cohen; Ariel Lowrey; Natalie M Daumeyer; Nicholas P Camp; Brent L Hughes; Jennifer L Eberhardt; Kim A Taylor-Thompson; Damien A Fair; Jennifer A Richeson; B J Casey
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  The interplay of resting and inhibitory control-related theta-band activity depends on age.

Authors:  Charlotte Pscherer; Annet Bluschke; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Dissociable Catecholaminergic Modulation of Visual Attention: Differential Effects of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase and Dopamine Beta-Hydroxylase Genes on Visual Attention.

Authors:  Nir Shalev; Signe Vangkilde; Matt J Neville; Elizabeth M Tunbridge; Anna C Nobre; Magdalena Chechlacz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Task-irrelevant odours affect both response inhibition and response readiness in fast-paced Go/No-Go task: the case of valence.

Authors:  Javier Albayay; Umberto Castiello; Valentina Parma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Demonstrating and disrupting well-learned habits.

Authors:  Ahmet O Ceceli; Catherine E Myers; Elizabeth Tricomi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Coping Using Sex During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Steven M Gillespie; Andrew Jones; Kasia Uzieblo; Carlo Garofalo; Eric Robinson
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.937

10.  Do shorter inter-stimulus intervals in the go/no-go task enable better assessment of response inhibition?

Authors:  Akira Hasegawa; Noboru Matsumoto; Yuko Yamashita; Keisuke Tanaka; Jun Kawaguchi; Tetsuya Yamamoto
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2020-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.