| Literature DB >> 28664116 |
Shahin Gavanji1, Sayed R Zaker2, Zahra G Nejad3, Azizollah Bakhtari4, Elham S Bidabadi5, Behrouz Larki1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Candida species are the most important factors of fungal infections in humans and animals. It is necessary to prepare antifungal or antimicrobial drugs because of increasing drug resistance. The natural treatment of diseases of bacterial origin using medicinal plants is important. In this study the effect of antimicrobial medicinal herbal essential oils and conventional antifungal drugs were evaluated on Candida albicans in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: Candida albicans; disc diffusion assay; gas chromatograph–mass spectroscopy; herbal essential oil; microbroth dilution method
Year: 2015 PMID: 28664116 PMCID: PMC5481788 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2015.01.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Med Res ISSN: 2213-4220
Fig. 1Comparison of the effects of the herbal essential oils and antibiotics on the Candida albicans fungus using the disc method. The data are expressed as the mean ± the standard error. Different letters in each column indicate significant differences (p < 0.0001). The data are separately compared for 24 hours and 48 hours.
Antifungal activity of different concentrations of herbal essential oils using the disc diffusion method (i.e., zone of inhibition)
| Concentration (μg/mL) | 24 | 48 | 24 | 48 | 24 | 48 | 24 | 48 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a |
| 1.25 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a |
| 2.50 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a |
| 5 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.17 ± 0.17 a | 0.17 ± 0.17 a |
| 10 | 0.07 ± 0.07 a | 0.07 ± 0.07 a | 0.17 ± 0.17 a | 0.40 ± 0.21 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 1.23 ± 0.20 a | 2.47 ± 0.44 a,b |
| 20 | 0.70 ± 0.21 a,b | 1.40 ± 0.23 a,b | 0.93 ± 0.18 a | 1.63 ± 0.32 a,b | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 3.17 ± 0.44 a,b | 4.43 ± 0.42 b |
| 40 | 1.10 ± 0.10 a,b | 1.93 ± 0.12 b | 1.77 ± 0.23 a | 3.67 ± 0.48 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 4.87 ± 0.13 b | 8.20 ± 0.61 c |
| 60 | 2.23 ± 0.28 b,c | 3.60 ± 0.32 c | 4.70 ± 0.70 b | 6.70 ± 0.30 c | 0.23 ± 0.12 a | 0.23 ± 0.12 a | 9.83 ± 0.44 c | 11.80 ± 0.76 d |
| 80 | 4.20 ± 0.20 cd | 6.40 ± 0.23 d | 6.90 ± 0.38 b,c | 10.57 ± 0.38 d | 1.07 ± 0.12 a | 1.50 ± 0.29 a,b | 14.00 ± 0.29 d | 16.40 ± 0.38 e |
| 100 | 5.60 ± 0.38 d | 8.13 ± 0.47 e | 8.67 ± 0.42 c | 12.37 ± 0.35 d | 2.40 ± 0.21 b | 3.77 ± 0.28 c | 20.23 ± 1.48 e | 23.37 ± 0.33 f |
| 200 | 8.00 ± 0.21 e | 12.30 ± 0.47 f | 13.50 ± 0.81 d | 16.20 ± 0.61 e | 3.67 ± 0.49 c | 6.73 ± 0.27 d | 20.20 ± 0.64 e | 25.87 ± 0.58 f,g |
| 300 | 11.33 ± 0.70 f | 14.57 ± 0.2 g | 16.80 ± 0.15 e | 20.43 ± 0.73 f | 7.20 ± 0.25 d | 8.80 ± 0.42 e | 22.57 ± 1.33 ef | 27.70 ± 1.8 g,h |
| 400 | 12.80 ± 0.40 f | 17.27 ± 0.50 h | 20.20 ± 0.40 f | 24.43 ± 0.6 g | 10.50 ± 0.29 e | 12.40 ± 0.61f | 25.60 ± 0.7 f,g | 29.80 ± 0.40 h |
| 500 | 15.83 ± 1.1 g | 20.83 ± 0.44 i | 23.87 ± 0.9 g | 28.30 ± 1.33 h | 11.17 ± 0.49 e | 14.33 ± 0.4 g | 26.37 ± 0.6 g | 34.87 ± 0.73 i |
Data are presented as mean ± SE.
a-i Different letters on every column represent meaningful difference (p < 0.0001).
Fig. 2Comparison of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum lethal concentration (MFC) of herbal essential oils and antibiotics on the fungus Candida. The data are expressed as the mean ± the standard error. Different letters in each column indicate significant differences (p < 0.0001). The data are separately compared for 24 hours and 48 hours.
The composition of Cuminum cyminum and Zataria multiflora Boiss
| No. | Composition | % | RI | No | Composition | % | RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | α-Thujene | 0.39 | 929 | 1 | α-Thujene | 0.34 | 931 |
| 2 | α-Pinene | 1.04 | 941 | 2 | α-Pinene | 3.88 | 937 |
| 3 | Sabinene | 1.13 | 974 | 3 | Camphene | 0.18 | 951 |
| 4 | β-Pinene | 15.94 | 978 | 4 | Verbenene | 0.02 | 956 |
| 5 | β-Myrcene | 1.11 | 988 | 5 | Sabinene | 0.02 | 974 |
| 6 | α-Phellandrene | 0.96 | 1006 | 6 | β-Pinene | 0.68 | 979 |
| 7 | Δ-3-Carene | 0.06 | 1011 | 7 | β-Myrcene | 0.68 | 993 |
| 8 | α-Terpinene | 0.23 | 1016 | 8 | α-Phellandrene | 0.11 | 1007 |
| 9 | 6.22 | 1028 | 9 | Δ-3-Carene | 0.04 | 1012 | |
| 10 | 1,8-Cineole | 0.2 | 1030 | 10 | 1.32 | 1016 | |
| 11 | β-Phellandrene | 0.84 | 1032 | 11 | 11.34 | 1025 | |
| 12 | γ-Terpinene | 25.32 | 1056 | 12 | Limonene | 0.67 | 1032 |
| 13 | α-Terpinolene | 0.08 | 1082 | 13 | 1,8-Cineole | 0.55 | 1030 |
| 14 | Linalool | 0.11 | 1098 | 14 | γ-Terpinene | 4.73 | 1057 |
| 15 | cis-Sabinene hydrate | 0.06 | 1100 | 15 | 0.27 | 1087 | |
| 16 | Terpin-4-ol | 0.22 | 1173 | 16 | Linalool | 1.46 | 1098 |
| 17 | α-Terpienol | 0.05 | 1186 | 17 | Borneol | 0.37 | 1162 |
| 18 | Cuminic aldehyde | 11.15 | 1225 | 18 | Terpinen-4-ol | 0.82 | 1186 |
| 19 | Safranal | 2.91 | 1274 | 19 | α-Terpineol | 0.67 | 1191 |
| 20 | Cuminic alcohol | 30.32 | 1282 | 20 | Carvacrol methyl ether | 0.77 | 1239 |
| 21 | γ-Elemene | 0.09 | 1394 | 21 | Carvol | 0.77 | 1239 |
| 22 | Myrtenol | 0.14 | 1402 | 22 | 2.46 | 1281 | |
| 23 | β-Caryophyllene | 0.08 | 1412 | 23 | Thymol | 33.05 | 1285 |
| 24 | trans-β-Farnesene | 0.1 | 1427 | 24 | Carvacrol | 25.88 | 1297 |
| 25 | Thymyl acetate | 1.03 | 1311 | ||||
| 26 | Carvacryl acetate | 0.69 | 1371 | ||||
| 27 | β-Caryophyllene | 1.83 | 1412 | ||||
| 28 | Aromadendrene | 0.84 | 1437 | ||||
| 29 | 0.09 | 1443 | |||||
| 30 | Germacrene- | 0.13 | 1473 | ||||
| 31 | Ledene | 0.77 | 1491 | ||||
| 32 | 0.09 | 1537 | |||||
| 33 | (+) spathulenol | 0.24 | 1579 | ||||
| 34 | Caryophyllene oxide | 0.15 | 1589 | ||||
| Total 98.75 | Total 96.94 | ||||||
RI, Retention Index.
The composition of Foeniculum vulgare Mill and Satureja hortensis L
| No. | Composition | % | RI | No. | Composition | % | RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | α-Thujene | 0.08 | 931 | 1 | α-Thujene | 0.88 | 931 |
| 2 | Camphene | 0.15 | 951 | 2 | α-Pinene | 1.32 | 937 |
| 3 | Sabinene | 0.33 | 974 | 3 | Camphene | 0.14 | 951 |
| 4 | β-Pinene | 0.09 | 979 | 4 | Sabinene | 0.07 | 974 |
| 5 | β-Myrcene | 0.53 | 993 | 5 | β-Pinene | 0.57 | 979 |
| 6 | α-Phellandrene | 0.23 | 1007 | 6 | β-Myrcene | 1.45 | 993 |
| 7 | α-Terpinene | 0.14 | 1016 | 7 | α-Phellandrene | 0.39 | 1007 |
| 8 | 0.28 | 1025 | 8 | Δ-3-Carene | 0.1 | 1012 | |
| 9 | Limonene | 6.3 | 10.32 | 9 | α-Terpinene | 4.31 | 1016 |
| 10 | β-Ocimene Z | 0.91 | 10.38 | 10 | p-Cymene | 6.62 | 1025 |
| 11 | γ-Terpinene | 1.35 | 10.57 | 11 | Limonene | 1.63 | 1032 |
| 12 | Fenchone | 12.08 | 1089 | 12 | 1,8-Cineole | 0.25 | 1030 |
| 13 | Camphor | 0.27 | 1143 | 13 | β-Ocimene Z | 0.15 | 1038 |
| 14 | Anisole, | 3.76 | 1200 | 14 | γ-Terpinene | 31.96 | 1057 |
| 15 | Fenchyl acetate | 0.15 | 1216 | 15 | α-Thujone | 2.17 | 1087 |
| 16 | Anethole | 68.62 | 1251 | 16 | Borneol | 0.3 | 1062 |
| 17 | Thymol | 1.81 | 1285 | 17 | α-Terpineol | 0.22 | 1086 |
| 18 | Thymol | 9.96 | 1285 | ||||
| 19 | Carvacrol | 32.38 | 1285 | ||||
| 20 | β-Caryophyllene | 0.26 | 1412 | ||||
| Total 97.94 | Total 94.25 | ||||||
RI, Retention Index.