Literature DB >> 28663840

Endoscope field of view measurement.

Quanzeng Wang1, Azadeh Khanicheh2, Dennis Leiner3, David Shafer4, Jurgen Zobel5.   

Abstract

The current International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard (ISO 8600-3: 1997 including Amendment 1: 2003) for determining endoscope field of view (FOV) does not accurately characterize some novel endoscopic technologies such as endoscopes with a close focus distance and capsule endoscopes. We evaluated the endoscope FOV measurement method (the FOVWS method) in the current ISO 8600-3 standard and proposed a new method (the FOVEP method). We compared the two methods by measuring the FOV of 18 models of endoscopes (one device for each model) from seven key international manufacturers. We also estimated the device to device variation of two models of colonoscopes by measuring several hundreds of devices. Our results showed that the FOVEP method was more accurate than the FOVWS method, and could be used for all endoscopes. We also found that the labelled FOV values of many commercial endoscopes are significantly overstated. Our study can help endoscope users understand endoscope FOV and identify a proper method for FOV measurement. This paper can be used as a reference to revise the current endoscope FOV measurement standard.

Keywords:  (120.0120) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology; (120.4800) Optical standards and testing

Year:  2017        PMID: 28663840      PMCID: PMC5480555          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.8.001441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  7 in total

1.  Development of a catadioptric endoscope objective with forward and side views.

Authors:  Roy Chih Chung Wang; M Jamal Deen; David Armstrong; Qiyin Fang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  High-definition and high-magnification endoscopes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  A wide field-of-view scanning endoscope for whole anal canal imaging.

Authors:  Chao Han; Jiangtao Huangfu; Lily L Lai; Changhuei Yang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  Capsule endoscopy: Present status and future expectation.

Authors:  Mahesh K Goenka; Shounak Majumder; Usha Goenka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Development of the local magnification method for quantitative evaluation of endoscope geometric distortion.

Authors:  Quanzeng Wang; Wei-Chung Cheng; Nitin Suresh; Hong Hua
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Field of view comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopy.

Authors:  Jamie J Van Gompel; Mark H Tabor; A Samy Youssef; Tsz Lau; Andrew P Carlson; Harry R van Loveren; Siviero Agazzi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  A multicenter randomized comparison of the Endocapsule and the Pillcam SB.

Authors:  David R Cave; David E Fleischer; Jonathan A Leighton; Douglas O Faigel; Russell I Heigh; Virender K Sharma; Christopher J Gostout; Elizabeth Rajan; Klaus Mergener; Anne Foley; Michael Lee; Kanishka Bhattacharya
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 9.427

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Electrically tunable fluidic lens imaging system for laparoscopic fluorescence-guided surgery.

Authors:  Davide Volpi; Iain D C Tullis; Paul R Barber; Edyta M Augustyniak; Sean C Smart; Katherine A Vallis; Borivoj Vojnovic
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Free-Form Deformation Approach for Registration of Visible and Infrared Facial Images in Fever Screening.

Authors:  Yedukondala Narendra Dwith Chenna; Pejhman Ghassemi; T Joshua Pfefer; Jon Casamento; Quanzeng Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  USB capsule endoscope for retrograde imaging of the esophagus.

Authors:  Ivan Martincek; Peter Banovcin; Matej Goraus; Martin Duricek
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.170

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.