Parveen Ahlawat1, Sheh Rawat2, Anjali Kakria1, Bharti Devnani3, Inderjit Kaur Wahi1, David K Simson4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi 110085, India. 2. Dharamshila Hospital and Research Centre, Vasundhara Enclave, New Delhi 110096, India. 3. Department of Radiotherapy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India. 4. Action Cancer Hospital, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi, 110063, India.
Abstract
AIM: To study and explores the feasibility and efficacy of re-irradiation (Re-RT) for locally recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) and second primary (SP) malignancies. BACKGROUND: The most common form of treatment failure after radiotherapy (RT) for HNC is loco-regional recurrence (LRR), and around 20-50% of patients develop LRR. Re-irradiation (Re-RT) has been the primary standard of care in the last decade for unresectable locally recurrent/SP HNC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis in which we reviewed the medical records of 51 consecutive patients who had received Re-RT to the head and neck region at our institute between 2006 and 2015. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included for assessment of acute and late toxicities, response evaluation at 3 months post Re-RT, and analyses of locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). The median LRC was 11.2 months, and at 2 and 5 years the LRC rates were 41% and 21.2%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed two factors: initial surgical resection performed prior to Re-RT, and achievement of CR at 3 months after completion of Re-RT to be significantly associated with a better median LRC. The median OS was 28.2 months, and at 1, 2, and 5 years, OS were 71.1%, 55.9% and 18%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed initial surgical resection performed prior to Re-RT, and achievement of CR at 3 months post completion of Re-RT being only two factors significantly associated with a better median OS. Acute toxicity reports showed that no patients developed grade 5 toxicity, and 2 patients developed grade 4 acute toxicities. CONCLUSION: Re-RT for the treatment of recurrent/SP head and neck tumors is feasible and effective, with acceptable toxicity. However, appropriate patient selection criteria are highly important in determining survival and treatment outcomes.
AIM: To study and explores the feasibility and efficacy of re-irradiation (Re-RT) for locally recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) and second primary (SP) malignancies. BACKGROUND: The most common form of treatment failure after radiotherapy (RT) for HNC is loco-regional recurrence (LRR), and around 20-50% of patients develop LRR. Re-irradiation (Re-RT) has been the primary standard of care in the last decade for unresectable locally recurrent/SP HNC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis in which we reviewed the medical records of 51 consecutive patients who had received Re-RT to the head and neck region at our institute between 2006 and 2015. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included for assessment of acute and late toxicities, response evaluation at 3 months post Re-RT, and analyses of locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). The median LRC was 11.2 months, and at 2 and 5 years the LRC rates were 41% and 21.2%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed two factors: initial surgical resection performed prior to Re-RT, and achievement of CR at 3 months after completion of Re-RT to be significantly associated with a better median LRC. The median OS was 28.2 months, and at 1, 2, and 5 years, OS were 71.1%, 55.9% and 18%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed initial surgical resection performed prior to Re-RT, and achievement of CR at 3 months post completion of Re-RT being only two factors significantly associated with a better median OS. Acute toxicity reports showed that no patients developed grade 5 toxicity, and 2 patients developed grade 4 acute toxicities. CONCLUSION: Re-RT for the treatment of recurrent/SP head and neck tumors is feasible and effective, with acceptable toxicity. However, appropriate patient selection criteria are highly important in determining survival and treatment outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Head neck; Intensity modulated radiotherapy; Recurrent; Reirradiation; Salvage
Authors: Jordan Kharofa; Nicholas Choong; Dian Wang; Selim Firat; Christopher Schultz; Chitra Sadasiwan; Stuart Wong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: John P Kostrzewa; William P Lancaster; Tim A Iseli; Renee A Desmond; William R Carroll; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Nadeem Riaz; Julian C Hong; Eric J Sherman; Luc Morris; Matthew Fury; Ian Ganly; Tony J C Wang; Weji Shi; Suzanne L Wolden; Andrew Jackson; Richard J Wong; Zhigang Zhang; Shyam D Rao; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Matthew C Biagioli; Mark Harvey; Eloy Roman; Luis E Raez; Aaron H Wolfson; Subhakar Mutyala; Hyo S Han; Arnold Markoe Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Corey J Langer; Jonathan Harris; Eric M Horwitz; Nicos Nicolaou; Merrill Kies; Walter Curran; Stuart Wong; Kian Ang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R De Crevoisier; J Bourhis; C Domenge; P Wibault; S Koscielny; A Lusinchi; G Mamelle; F Janot; M Julieron; A M Leridant; P Marandas; J P Armand; G Schwaab; B Luboinski; F Eschwege Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mateusz Szewczyk; Paweł Golusiński; Jakub Pazdrowski; Piotr Pieńkowski; Sławomir Marszałek; Jacek Sygut; Wojciech Golusiński Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2018-06-23