Literature DB >> 28663344

Gene2Function: An Integrated Online Resource for Gene Function Discovery.

Yanhui Hu1, Aram Comjean1, Stephanie E Mohr1, Norbert Perrimon2,3,4.   

Abstract

One of the most powerful ways to develop hypotheses regarding the biological functions of conserved genes in a given species, such as humans, is to first look at what is known about their function in another species. Model organism databases and other resources are rich with functional information but difficult to mine. Gene2Function addresses a broad need by integrating information about conserved genes in a single online resource.
Copyright © 2017 Hu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data mining; functional genomics; human genetic disease; model organism databases; orthologs

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28663344      PMCID: PMC5555488          DOI: 10.1534/g3.117.043885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)        ISSN: 2160-1836            Impact factor:   3.154


The availability of full-genome sequences has uncovered a striking level of conservation among genes from single-celled organisms such as yeast, invertebrates such as flies or nematode worms, and vertebrates such as fish, mice, and humans. This conservation is not limited to amino acid identity or structure, or RNA sequence. Indeed, gene conservation often extends to conservation of biochemical function (e.g., common enzymatic functions); cellular function (e.g., specific role in intracellular signal transduction); and function at the organ, tissue, and whole-organism levels (e.g., control of organ formation, tissue homeostasis, or behavior). Researchers applying small- or large-scale approaches in any common model organism often come across genes that are poorly characterized in their species of interest. A common and powerful way to develop an hypothesis regarding the function of a gene poorly characterized in one species—or newly implicated in some processes in that species—is to ask whether the gene is conserved and, if so, find out what is known about the functions of its orthologs in other species. This commonly applied approach gains importance when the poorly characterized gene is implicated in a human disease; in many cases, what we know about human gene function is largely based on what was first uncovered for orthologs in other species. Despite the importance and broad application of this approach among biologists and biomedical researchers, there are barriers to applying the approach to its fullest. First, ortholog mapping is not straightforward. Over the years, many approaches and algorithms have been applied to mapping of orthologs. The results do not always agree and, at a practical level, the use of different genome annotation versions, as well as different gene or protein identifiers, can make it difficult to identify or have confidence in an ortholog relationship. Second, even after one or more orthologs in common model species have been identified, it is not easy to quickly assess in which species the orthologs have been studied and determine what functional information was gained. Model organism databases (MODs) and human gene databases provide relevant, expertly curated information. Although InterMine (Smith ) provides a mechanism for batch search of standardized information, and NCBI Gene provides information about individual genes in a standardized format, it remains a challenge to navigate, access, and integrate information about all of the orthologs of a given gene in well-studied organisms. As a result, useful information can be missed, contributing to inefficiency and needless delay in reaching the goal of functional annotation of genes, including genes relevant to human disease. Clearly, there is a need for an integrated resource that facilitates the identification of orthologs and mining of information regarding ortholog function, in particular, in common genetic model organisms supported by MODs. Previously, we developed approaches for integration of various types of gene- or protein-related information, including ortholog predictions [DRSC Integrative Ortholog Prediction Tool (DIOPT); Hu ], disease–gene mapping based on various sources [DIOPT–Diseases and Traits (DIOPT–DIST); Hu ], and transcriptomics data [Drosophila Gene Expression Tool (DGET); Hu ]. Importantly, these can serve as individual components of a more comprehensive, integrated resource. Indeed, our DIOPT approach to identification of high-confidence ortholog predictions is now used in other contexts, including at FlyBase (Gramates ) and at MARRVEL for mining information starting with human gene variant information (Wang ; www.marrvel.org). To address the broad need for an integrated resource, we developed Gene2Function (G2F; www.gene2function.org), an online resource that maps orthologs among human genes and common genetic model species supported by MODs, and displays summary information for each ortholog. G2F makes it easy to survey the wealth of information available for orthologs and navigate from one species to another, and connects users to detailed reports and information at individual MODs and other sources. The integration approach and set of information sources are outlined in Figure 1 and Table 1, and described in the Supplemental Material, File S1 (Supplemental Methods).
Figure 1

Overview of the Gene2Function (G2F) online resource. For detailed information about the database, logic flow, and information sources, see File S1.

Table 1

Summary of disease and gene reports displayed in Gene2Function (G2F)

Column HeaderContentSource of Content
Disease report
 Gene symbol humanOfficial gene symbolNCBI gene
 Gene ID humanNCBI gene IDNCBI gene
 Count disease termsNumber of disease termsOMIM, EBI GWAS
 Disease termsDisease termsOMIM, EBI GWAS
 Ortholog overviewLink to G2F gene reportInternal
Gene report
 NCBI gene IDNCBI gene IDNCBI gene
 SymbolOfficial gene symbolNCBI gene
 Human disease countsNumber of disease terms; link to MARRVELaOMIM, EBI GWAS
 Species nameSpecies name
 Species-specific gene IDSpecies-specific gene IDLinks to HGNC or MOD gene reportb
 Species-specific databaseRelevant database nameLinks to HGNC or MOD home page
 DIOPT scoreDIOPT scorecDIOPT
 Best scoreYes or no, this pair has best score at DIOPTDIOPT
 Best score reverseYes or no, this pair has best score if opposite searchDIOPT
 ConfidenceDIOPT confidencedDIOPT
 Publication countNumber of publications on the orthologNCBI gene2pubmed
 GO component countsNumber of cellular component GO terms assigned to the orthologNCBI gene2go
 GO function countsNumber of molecular function GO terms assigned to the orthologNCBI gene2go
 GO process countsNumber of biological processes GO terms assigned to the orthologNCBI gene2go
 Protein interaction countsNumber of protein interactions assigned to the orthologBioGrid
 Genetic interaction countsNumber of genetic interactions assigned to the orthologBioGrid
 Mine phenotype dataNumber of phenotype entries from MineseHumanMine, MouseMine, XenMine, ZebrafishMine, FlyMine, WormBase, SGD
 Mine expression dataNumber of expression entries from MineseHumanMine, MouseMine, XenMine, ZebrafishMine, FlyMine, WormBase, SGD
 Mine disruption phenotypeNumber of disruption phenotype entriesUniProt
 3D structureNumber of 3D structures available for the orthologProtein data bank
 ORF clonesNumber of ORF clonesPlasmID clone repositoryf
 Protein alignmentMultiple or pairwise alignment of orthologsDIOPT

OMIM, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man; EBI, European Bioinformatics Institute; GWAS, genome-wide association study; HGNC, HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee; MOD, model organism database; DIOPT, DRSC Integrative Ortholog Prediction Tool; GO, gene ontology; SGD, Saccharomyces Genome Database; ORF, open reading frame.

MARRVEL, Model organism Aggregated Resources for Rare Variant ExpLoration (Wang ).

The databases included at G2F are MGI (Blake ), RGD (Shimoyama ), Xenbase (Karpinka ), ZFIN (Howe ), FlyBase (Gramates ), WormBase (Howe ), SGD (Cherry ), and PomBase (McDowall ).

DIOPT score, number of ortholog prediction tools included at DIOPT (Hu ) that cover both species and predict the displayed ortholog match.

In this column, “High” indicates that the ortholog pair has the best score among all pairs with both a forward and a reverse direction score and a DIOPT ≥ 2; “Moderate” indicates that the ortholog pair has the best score with the forward or the reverse search and a DIOPT ≥ 2, or has a DIOPT score ≥ 4 but is not the best score with either a forward or reverse search; and “Low” includes all other predicted ortholog pairs.

Mines (or MODs serving that function): HumanMine, MouseMine, XenMine, ZebrafishMine, FlyMine, WormBase, and SGD (Cherry ; Smith ; Howe ).

Links provided for one of several repositories in the United States and overseas that have ORF clones, many of which are from the ORFeome Collaboration (2016).

Overview of the Gene2Function (G2F) online resource. For detailed information about the database, logic flow, and information sources, see File S1. OMIM, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man; EBI, European Bioinformatics Institute; GWAS, genome-wide association study; HGNC, HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee; MOD, model organism database; DIOPT, DRSC Integrative Ortholog Prediction Tool; GO, gene ontology; SGD, Saccharomyces Genome Database; ORF, open reading frame. MARRVEL, Model organism Aggregated Resources for Rare Variant ExpLoration (Wang ). The databases included at G2F are MGI (Blake ), RGD (Shimoyama ), Xenbase (Karpinka ), ZFIN (Howe ), FlyBase (Gramates ), WormBase (Howe ), SGD (Cherry ), and PomBase (McDowall ). DIOPT score, number of ortholog prediction tools included at DIOPT (Hu ) that cover both species and predict the displayed ortholog match. In this column, “High” indicates that the ortholog pair has the best score among all pairs with both a forward and a reverse direction score and a DIOPT ≥ 2; “Moderate” indicates that the ortholog pair has the best score with the forward or the reverse search and a DIOPT ≥ 2, or has a DIOPT score ≥ 4 but is not the best score with either a forward or reverse search; and “Low” includes all other predicted ortholog pairs. Mines (or MODs serving that function): HumanMine, MouseMine, XenMine, ZebrafishMine, FlyMine, WormBase, and SGD (Cherry ; Smith ; Howe ). Links provided for one of several repositories in the United States and overseas that have ORF clones, many of which are from the ORFeome Collaboration (2016). To demonstrate the utility of G2F, we focus on two use cases: (1) a search initiated with a single human or common model organism gene of interest, and (2) a search initiated with a single human disease term of interest. A gene search at G2F connects users to ortholog information and an overview of functional information for orthologs (Table 1). Specifically, starting with a search of a human, mouse, frog, fish, fly, worm, or yeast gene, users reach a summary table of orthologs and information. Information displayed includes the number of gene ontology (GO) terms assigned based on experimental evidence; the number of publications; and the number of molecular and genetic interactions reported. When available, the table also includes links to expression pattern annotations, phenotype annotations, three-dimensional structure information (Rose ), and open reading frame (ORF) clones from the ORFeome collaboration consortium (Lamesch ; Hu ; ORFeome Collaboration 2016) which are available in a public repository (Zuo ). The summary allows a user to quickly (1) evaluate conservation across major model organisms based on DIOPT score, pairwise alignment of the query protein to another species, and multiple-sequence alignment; (2) assess in what species the query gene has been well studied based on original publications, annotation, and data; and (3) identify reagents for follow-up studies. The summary table also allows a user to view detailed reports and is hyperlinked to more detailed information at original sources, such as data on specific gene pages at MODs. A disease search at G2F first connects from disease terms to associated human genes, then uses the gene search results table format to display orthologs of the human gene and summary information (Table 1). After a search with a human disease term, users are first shown a page that helps to disambiguate terms, expanding or focusing the search, and also allows users to limit the results to disease–gene relationships curated in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database and/or based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) from the National Human Genome Research Institute–European Bioinformatics Institute GWAS Catalog (MacArthur ). Next, users access a table of human genes that match the subset of terms, along with summary information regarding the genes and associated disease terms. On the far right-hand side of the table, users can connect to the same single gene-level report that is described above for a gene search. Over the past two decades, GWAS have begun to reveal genetic risk factors for many common disorders (Wangler ). As of February 2017, the GWAS Catalog (MacArthur ) included 2385 publications, with 10,499 reported genes associated with 1682 diseases or traits. For some of the human genes, there are no publications or GO annotations. We used G2F to survey information in model organisms for this subset of genes and found many cases where one or more orthologous genes have been studied (File S1). The results of the ortholog studies appear in some cases to support the disease association, and the corresponding model systems could provide a foundation for follow-up studies (Table S1). The human gene SAMD10, for example, has been shown (using the iCOGS custom genotyping array) to be one of 23 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci (Eeles ), but there is no information about this human gene available, aside from sequence and genome location. The results of a G2F search show that the gene is conserved in the mouse, rat, fish, fly, and worm. The mutant phenotypes of the fly ortholog suggest that the gene is involved in compound eye photoreceptor cell differentiation, EGFR signaling, positive regulation of Ras signaling, and ERK signaling, providing starting points for the development of new hypotheses regarding the function of SAMD10. Several uncharacterized human genes associated by GWAS with schizophrenia, namely IGSF9B, NT5DC2, C2orf69, and ASPHD1 (Ripke ; Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium 2014), are expressed at higher levels in the nervous system than in other tissues in one or more model organisms, suggesting a potential role in the nervous system in these models and supporting the idea that the models might be appropriate for follow-up studies aimed at understanding human gene function. These examples are extreme in that they represent human genes for which there are no publications describing functional information. For a large number of human genes, limited information is available. Functional annotations in model systems, as accessed through G2F, can help in the development of new hypotheses regarding the functions of these genes, as well as help researchers to choose an appropriate model organism or organisms for further study of the conserved gene. Altogether, G2F provides a highly integrated resource that facilitates efficient use of existing gene function information by providing a big-picture view of the information landscape and building bridges between different islands of information, including MODs. This approach complements approaches designed for searches starting with long gene lists (e.g., InterMine; Smith ) or those based on a phenotype-centered model (e.g., the Monarch Initiative; Mungall ). The modular nature of the G2F resource makes it possible to easily update the information sources (e.g., replace a module) and add new types of information (e.g., an expanded summary of reagents or new types of experimental data).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material is available online at www.g3journal.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1534/g3.117.043885/-/DC1. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  23 in total

1.  MARRVEL: Integration of Human and Model Organism Genetic Resources to Facilitate Functional Annotation of the Human Genome.

Authors:  Julia Wang; Rami Al-Ouran; Yanhui Hu; Seon-Young Kim; Ying-Wooi Wan; Michael F Wangler; Shinya Yamamoto; Hsiao-Tuan Chao; Aram Comjean; Stephanie E Mohr; Norbert Perrimon; Zhandong Liu; Hugo J Bellen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Approaching a complete repository of sequence-verified protein-encoding clones for Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Yanhui Hu; Andreas Rolfs; Bhupinder Bhullar; Tellamraju V S Murthy; Cong Zhu; Michael F Berger; Anamaria A Camargo; Fontina Kelley; Seamus McCarron; Daniel Jepson; Aaron Richardson; Jacob Raphael; Donna Moreira; Elena Taycher; Dongmei Zuo; Stephanie Mohr; Michael F Kane; Janice Williamson; Andrew Simpson; Martha L Bulyk; Edward Harlow; Gerald Marsischky; Richard D Kolodner; Joshua LaBaer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast.

Authors:  J Michael Cherry; Eurie L Hong; Craig Amundsen; Rama Balakrishnan; Gail Binkley; Esther T Chan; Karen R Christie; Maria C Costanzo; Selina S Dwight; Stacia R Engel; Dianna G Fisk; Jodi E Hirschman; Benjamin C Hitz; Kalpana Karra; Cynthia J Krieger; Stuart R Miyasato; Rob S Nash; Julie Park; Marek S Skrzypek; Matt Simison; Shuai Weng; Edith D Wong
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  The Rat Genome Database 2015: genomic, phenotypic and environmental variations and disease.

Authors:  Mary Shimoyama; Jeff De Pons; G Thomas Hayman; Stanley J F Laulederkind; Weisong Liu; Rajni Nigam; Victoria Petri; Jennifer R Smith; Marek Tutaj; Shur-Jen Wang; Elizabeth Worthey; Melinda Dwinell; Howard Jacob
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 19.160

5.  FlyBase at 25: looking to the future.

Authors:  L Sian Gramates; Steven J Marygold; Gilberto Dos Santos; Jose-Maria Urbano; Giulia Antonazzo; Beverley B Matthews; Alix J Rey; Christopher J Tabone; Madeline A Crosby; David B Emmert; Kathleen Falls; Joshua L Goodman; Yanhui Hu; Laura Ponting; Andrew J Schroeder; Victor B Strelets; Jim Thurmond; Pinglei Zhou
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-10-30       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Mouse Genome Database (MGD)-2017: community knowledge resource for the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Judith A Blake; Janan T Eppig; James A Kadin; Joel E Richardson; Cynthia L Smith; Carol J Bult
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Drosophila and genome-wide association studies: a review and resource for the functional dissection of human complex traits.

Authors:  Michael F Wangler; Yanhui Hu; Joshua M Shulman
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.758

8.  Genome-wide association analysis identifies 13 new risk loci for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Stephan Ripke; Colm O'Dushlaine; Kimberly Chambert; Jennifer L Moran; Anna K Kähler; Susanne Akterin; Sarah E Bergen; Ann L Collins; James J Crowley; Menachem Fromer; Yunjung Kim; Sang Hong Lee; Patrik K E Magnusson; Nick Sanchez; Eli A Stahl; Stephanie Williams; Naomi R Wray; Kai Xia; Francesco Bettella; Anders D Borglum; Brendan K Bulik-Sullivan; Paul Cormican; Nick Craddock; Christiaan de Leeuw; Naser Durmishi; Michael Gill; Vera Golimbet; Marian L Hamshere; Peter Holmans; David M Hougaard; Kenneth S Kendler; Kuang Lin; Derek W Morris; Ole Mors; Preben B Mortensen; Benjamin M Neale; Francis A O'Neill; Michael J Owen; Milica Pejovic Milovancevic; Danielle Posthuma; John Powell; Alexander L Richards; Brien P Riley; Douglas Ruderfer; Dan Rujescu; Engilbert Sigurdsson; Teimuraz Silagadze; August B Smit; Hreinn Stefansson; Stacy Steinberg; Jaana Suvisaari; Sarah Tosato; Matthijs Verhage; James T Walters; Douglas F Levinson; Pablo V Gejman; Kenneth S Kendler; Claudine Laurent; Bryan J Mowry; Michael C O'Donovan; Michael J Owen; Ann E Pulver; Brien P Riley; Sibylle G Schwab; Dieter B Wildenauer; Frank Dudbridge; Peter Holmans; Jianxin Shi; Margot Albus; Madeline Alexander; Dominique Campion; David Cohen; Dimitris Dikeos; Jubao Duan; Peter Eichhammer; Stephanie Godard; Mark Hansen; F Bernard Lerer; Kung-Yee Liang; Wolfgang Maier; Jacques Mallet; Deborah A Nertney; Gerald Nestadt; Nadine Norton; Francis A O'Neill; George N Papadimitriou; Robert Ribble; Alan R Sanders; Jeremy M Silverman; Dermot Walsh; Nigel M Williams; Brandon Wormley; Maria J Arranz; Steven Bakker; Stephan Bender; Elvira Bramon; David Collier; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro; Jeremy Hall; Conrad Iyegbe; Assen Jablensky; Rene S Kahn; Luba Kalaydjieva; Stephen Lawrie; Cathryn M Lewis; Kuang Lin; Don H Linszen; Ignacio Mata; Andrew McIntosh; Robin M Murray; Roel A Ophoff; John Powell; Dan Rujescu; Jim Van Os; Muriel Walshe; Matthias Weisbrod; Durk Wiersma; Peter Donnelly; Ines Barroso; Jenefer M Blackwell; Elvira Bramon; Matthew A Brown; Juan P Casas; Aiden P Corvin; Panos Deloukas; Audrey Duncanson; Janusz Jankowski; Hugh S Markus; Christopher G Mathew; Colin N A Palmer; Robert Plomin; Anna Rautanen; Stephen J Sawcer; Richard C Trembath; Ananth C Viswanathan; Nicholas W Wood; Chris C A Spencer; Gavin Band; Céline Bellenguez; Colin Freeman; Garrett Hellenthal; Eleni Giannoulatou; Matti Pirinen; Richard D Pearson; Amy Strange; Zhan Su; Damjan Vukcevic; Peter Donnelly; Cordelia Langford; Sarah E Hunt; Sarah Edkins; Rhian Gwilliam; Hannah Blackburn; Suzannah J Bumpstead; Serge Dronov; Matthew Gillman; Emma Gray; Naomi Hammond; Alagurevathi Jayakumar; Owen T McCann; Jennifer Liddle; Simon C Potter; Radhi Ravindrarajah; Michelle Ricketts; Avazeh Tashakkori-Ghanbaria; Matthew J Waller; Paul Weston; Sara Widaa; Pamela Whittaker; Ines Barroso; Panos Deloukas; Christopher G Mathew; Jenefer M Blackwell; Matthew A Brown; Aiden P Corvin; Mark I McCarthy; Chris C A Spencer; Elvira Bramon; Aiden P Corvin; Michael C O'Donovan; Kari Stefansson; Edward Scolnick; Shaun Purcell; Steven A McCarroll; Pamela Sklar; Christina M Hultman; Patrick F Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  WormBase 2016: expanding to enable helminth genomic research.

Authors:  Kevin L Howe; Bruce J Bolt; Scott Cain; Juancarlos Chan; Wen J Chen; Paul Davis; James Done; Thomas Down; Sibyl Gao; Christian Grove; Todd W Harris; Ranjana Kishore; Raymond Lee; Jane Lomax; Yuling Li; Hans-Michael Muller; Cecilia Nakamura; Paulo Nuin; Michael Paulini; Daniela Raciti; Gary Schindelman; Eleanor Stanley; Mary Ann Tuli; Kimberly Van Auken; Daniel Wang; Xiaodong Wang; Gary Williams; Adam Wright; Karen Yook; Matthew Berriman; Paul Kersey; Tim Schedl; Lincoln Stein; Paul W Sternberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Model organism data evolving in support of translational medicine.

Authors:  Douglas G Howe; Judith A Blake; Yvonne M Bradford; Carol J Bult; Brian R Calvi; Stacia R Engel; James A Kadin; Thomas C Kaufman; Ranjana Kishore; Stanley J F Laulederkind; Suzanna E Lewis; Sierra A T Moxon; Joel E Richardson; Cynthia Smith
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 12.625

2.  Functional Studies of Genetic Variants Associated with Human Diseases in Notch Signaling-Related Genes Using Drosophila.

Authors:  Sheng-An Yang; Jose L Salazar; David Li-Kroeger; Shinya Yamamoto
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila.

Authors:  J Michael Harnish; Samantha L Deal; Hsiao-Tuan Chao; Michael F Wangler; Shinya Yamamoto
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Exacerbating and reversing lysosomal storage diseases: from yeast to humans.

Authors:  Tamayanthi Rajakumar; Andrew B Munkacsi; Stephen L Sturley
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2017-08-25

5.  Advances and Applications in the Quest for Orthologs.

Authors:  Natasha Glover; Christophe Dessimoz; Ingo Ebersberger; Sofia K Forslund; Toni Gabaldón; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Maria-Jesus Martin; Matthieu Muffato; Mateus Patricio; Cécile Pereira; Alan Sousa da Silva; Yan Wang; Erik Sonnhammer; Paul D Thomas
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Human gene and disease associations for clinical-genomics and precision medicine research.

Authors:  Zeeshan Ahmed; Saman Zeeshan; Dinesh Mendhe; XinQi Dong
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

7.  The H3K9 methyltransferase SETDB1 maintains female identity in Drosophila germ cells.

Authors:  Anne E Smolko; Laura Shapiro-Kulnane; Helen K Salz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  FlyBase 2.0: the next generation.

Authors:  Jim Thurmond; Joshua L Goodman; Victor B Strelets; Helen Attrill; L Sian Gramates; Steven J Marygold; Beverley B Matthews; Gillian Millburn; Giulia Antonazzo; Vitor Trovisco; Thomas C Kaufman; Brian R Calvi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Cisplatin treatment of testicular cancer patients introduces long-term changes in the epigenome.

Authors:  Cecilie Bucher-Johannessen; Christian M Page; Trine B Haugen; Marcin W Wojewodzic; Sophie D Fosså; Tom Grotmol; Hege S Haugnes; Trine B Rounge
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 6.551

Review 10.  The Alliance of Genome Resources: Building a Modern Data Ecosystem for Model Organism Databases.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.