Literature DB >> 28662588

Utilization of multiple spinal cord stimulation (SCS) waveforms in chronic pain patients.

Anthony P Berg1, Nitzan Mekel-Bobrov2, Edward Goldberg3, Dat Huynh3, Roshini Jain3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have improved patient outcomes, leading to its increased utilization for chronic pain. Chronic pain is dynamic showing exacerbations, variable severity, and evolving pain patterns. Given this complexity, SCS systems that provide a broad range of stimulation waveforms may be valuable.
METHODS: The aim of this research was to characterize the usage pattern of stimulation waveforms and field shapes in chronic pain patients implanted with the Spectra System. A review of daily device usage in a cohort of 250 patients implanted for a minimum duration of one month was conducted.
RESULTS: With follow-ups ranging between 1 month and 1 year post-implant, 72.8% of patients used Standard Rate, 34.8% Anode Intensification, 23.2% Higher Rate, and 8.4% Burst stimulation waveforms. Collectively, 60% used 1 or more advanced waveforms, either exclusively or along with Standard Rate. A trend showed patients continuing to use up to 3 programs one year post-implant.
CONCLUSION: When given a choice, SCS patients often utilize a variety of waveforms, suggesting that patients may benefit from a single system that provides multiple waveforms and field shapes to customize therapy and improve efficacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; spectra; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28662588     DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1345621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  3 in total

1.  Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Real-World Evidence and Outcomes Data.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Rudy Malayil; Terje Kirketeig; Timothy Deer
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Outcomes of a Multicenter, Prospective, Crossover, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Subperception Spinal Cord Stimulation at ≤1.2 kHz in Previously Implanted Subjects.

Authors:  James North; Eric Loudermilk; Albert Lee; Harsh Sachdeva; Demetrios Kaiafas; Edward Washabaugh; Samir Sheth; James Scowcroft; Nagy Mekhail; Benjamin Lampert; Thomas Yearwood; Erik Shaw; Joseph Atallah; Carroll McLeod; John Han; Cong Yu; Mark Sedrak; Rene Lucas; Andrew Trobridge; Joseph Hegarty; Nathan Miller; Lilly Chen; Roshini Jain
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-07-02

3.  The Challenge of Converting "Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation Syndrome" Back to Clinical Success, Using SCS Reprogramming as Salvage Therapy, through Neurostimulation Adapters Combined with 3D-Computerized Pain Mapping Assessment: A Real Life Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Philippe Rigoard; Amine Ounajim; Lisa Goudman; Tania Banor; France Héroux; Manuel Roulaud; Etienne Babin; Bénédicte Bouche; Philippe Page; Bertille Lorgeoux; Sandrine Baron; Nihel Adjali; Kevin Nivole; Mathilde Many; Elodie Charrier; Delphine Rannou; Laure Poupin; Chantal Wood; Romain David; Maarten Moens; Maxime Billot
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.