| Literature DB >> 28661455 |
Lei Shi1,2, Yi-Yu Jiang3, Tao Jiang4, Wei Yin5,6, Jian-Ping Yang7,8, Man-Li Cao9,10, Yu-Qi Fang11, Hai-Yang Liu12.
Abstract
Two new water-solubleEntities:
Keywords: DNA; cytotoxicity; iron; manganese; porphyrin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28661455 PMCID: PMC6152243 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22071084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Molecular structures of porphyrin derivatives.
Figure 2The UV-Vis spectral changes of 2-Fe in 5 mM Tris-HCl/50 mM NaCl buffer at different pH. Inset: enlarged Q bands.
Figure 3Absorption spectra of (a) 2-Mn (30 μM) and (c) 2-Fe (5 μM) upon the addition of ct-DNA in buffer I at 298 K and pH = 7.2. The arrow shows the intensity changes upon increasing the ct-DNA concentration; (b,d) are the plots of [DNA]/(εa − εf) versus [DNA]. The ccom corresponding to 0.0, 6.0, 12.0, 18.0, 24.0, 30.0, 36.0, 42.0, 48.0 (mM) from a to i.
Figure 4Fluorescence quenching spectra of EB (5 mM) bound to ct-DNA (30 mM) by 2-Mn (a) and 2-Fe (c) in buffer I at 298 K and pH = 7.2. The arrow shows the intensity changes upon increasing the porphyrins concentration; (b,d) are the plots of F0/F versus [porphyrins] at three different temperatures. The ccom corresponding to 0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, 7.5, 9.0, 10.5, 12 (mM) from a to i.
Stern-Volmer quenching constants for the interaction of 2-Mn and 2-Fe with ct-DNA at three different temperatures and pH = 7.2.
| Compound | Ksv/L·mol−1 | Kq/L·mol−1·s−1 | R | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 298 | 3.33 × 104 | 3.35 × 1012 | 0.9977 | |
| 303 | 2.84 × 104 | 2.85 × 1012 | 0.9985 | |
| 308 | 2.48× 104 | 2.48 × 1012 | 0.9986 | |
| 298 | 2.89 × 104 | 2.89 × 1012 | 0.9990 | |
| 303 | 2.46× 104 | 2.46 × 1012 | 0.9979 | |
| 308 | 2.18 × 104 | 2.18 × 1012 | 0.9980 |
Figure 5Effect of increasing amounts of the complexes and ethidium bromide on the relative viscosity of ct-DNA (100 mM) in buffer I at 30 ± 0.01 °C and pH = 7.2. [complex]/[DNA] = 0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10.
Figure 6CD spectra of ct-DNA (100 mM) in the absence and presence of (a) 2-Mn and (b) 2-Fe in buffer I at 25 °C and pH = 7.2. r = [complex]/[DNA] = 0, 0.2, 0.5.
Figure 7Agarose gel electrophoresis patterns showing the cleavage of supercoiled pBR322 DNA (0.1 mg) by various concentrations of (a) 2-Mn and (b) 2-Fe in the presence of H2O2 (20 mM) in buffer II (pH = 7.2) for 30 min. lane 1: supercoiled pBR322 DNA alone; lane 2: DNA + H2O2; lane 3: DNA + porphyrin; lane 4–8: DNA + H2O2 + 5, 15, 30, 45, 60 μM porphyrin, respectively.
Figure 8Agarose gel electrophoresis patterns showing the cleavage of supercoiled pBR 322 DNA (0.1 mg) by (a) 2-Mn and (b) 2-Fe in the presence of H2O2 and additives in buffer II (pH = 7.2) for 30 min. lane 1: supercoiled pBR322 DNA alone; lane 2: DNA + 20 mM H2O2; lane 3: DNA + 20 μM porphyrin; lanes 4–9: DNA + 20 mM H2O2 + 20 μM porphyrin + 0, NaN3 (50 mM), DABCO (50 mM), l-histidine (50 mM), DMSO (50 mM), tert-BuOH (50 mM), respectively.
The cytotoxic activity of 2, 2-Mn and 2-Fe against selected cell lines in the same conditions.
| Compound | IC50 Value /(μM/L) (Dark) | IC50 Value/(μM/L) (Light) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCF-7 | Hep G2 | Hela | BEAS-2B | MCF-7 | Hep G2 | Hela | BEAS-2B | |
| 174.4 ± 4.9 | 306.7 ± 36.4 | >320 | >320 | >320 | 49.1 ± 13.8 | 74.9 ± 19.6 | 89.4 ± 15.2 | |
| >320 | 100.5 ± 4.7 | 61.7 ± 3.9 | 226.2 ± 15.7 | >320 | 19.0 ± 2.5 | 54.2 ± 4.2 | 245.3 ± 13.9 | |
| >320 | 175.5 ± 7.4 | >320 | >320 | 139.9 ± 7.7 | 137.5 ± 8.9 | >320 | >320 | |
| 177.1 ± 19.5 | 129.3 ± 16.2 | 168.3 ± 24.9 | 180.5 ± 17.4 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | |
The activity of meta-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorine (mTHPC, Foscan) was also obtained under the same experimental conditions.
Figure 9(A) Fluorescence microscopic images of Hoechst-33342 and PI stained Hep G2 cells after treatment with 2-Mn (20 μM) and 2-Fe (20 μM). Red arrow the early apoptosis cell, yellow arrow the late apoptosis cell; (B) Effect of 2-Mn (20 μM) and 2-Fe (20 μM) on the MMP decrease in Hep G2 cells.
Figure 10The morphological changes of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in the absence and presence of 2-Mn and 2-Fe with/without light.
Figure 11(A) Intracellular ROS detection in Hep G2 cells after treatment with 2-Mn by DCFH-DA, NAC (a free radical scavenger) with/without light, ** p < 0.01, significantly different compared with the control by t-test, n = 3; (B) Superoxide and hydroxyl radical detection of 2-Mn with/without light by EPR.