Literature DB >> 28661217

A comprehensive framework for evaluating the environmental health and safety implications of engineered nanomaterials.

William K Boyes1, Brittany Lila M Thornton1, Souhail R Al-Abed2, Christian P Andersen3, Dermont C Bouchard4, Robert M Burgess5, Elaine A Cohen Hubal1, Kay T Ho5, Michael F Hughes1, Kirk Kitchin1, Jay R Reichman3, Kim R Rogers6, Jeffrey A Ross1, Paul T Rygiewicz3, Kirk G Scheckel2, Sheau-Fung Thai1, Richard G Zepp4, Robert M Zucker1.   

Abstract

Engineered nanomaterials (ENM) are a growing aspect of the global economy, and their safe and sustainable development, use, and eventual disposal requires the capability to forecast and avoid potential problems. This review provides a framework to evaluate the health and safety implications of ENM releases into the environment, including purposeful releases such as for antimicrobial sprays or nano-enabled pesticides, and inadvertent releases as a consequence of other intended applications. Considerations encompass product life cycles, environmental media, exposed populations, and possible adverse outcomes. This framework is presented as a series of compartmental flow diagrams that serve as a basis to help derive future quantitative predictive models, guide research, and support development of tools for making risk-based decisions. After use, ENM are not expected to remain in their original form due to reactivity and/or propensity for hetero-agglomeration in environmental media. Therefore, emphasis is placed on characterizing ENM as they occur in environmental or biological matrices. In addition, predicting the activity of ENM in the environment is difficult due to the multiple dynamic interactions between the physical/chemical aspects of ENM and similarly complex environmental conditions. Others have proposed the use of simple predictive functional assays as an intermediate step to address the challenge of using physical/chemical properties to predict environmental fate and behavior of ENM. The nodes and interactions of the framework presented here reflect phase transitions that could be targets for development of such assays to estimate kinetic reaction rates and simplify model predictions. Application, refinement, and demonstration of this framework, along with an associated knowledgebase that includes targeted functional assay data, will allow better de novo predictions of potential exposures and adverse outcomes.

Keywords:  Engineered nanomaterials; adverse outcome pathway; ecotoxicity; environmental fate and transport; exposure; human health; inflammation; life cycle; nanoparticles; nanotoxicity; oxidative stress; transformations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28661217     DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2017.1328400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  13 in total

1.  Size, composition, morphology, and health implications of airborne incidental metal-containing nanoparticles.

Authors:  Natalia I Gonzalez-Pech; Larissa V Stebounova; Irem B Ustunol; Jae Hong Park; T Renee Anthony; Thomas M Peters; Vicki H Grassian
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Minimum information reporting in bio-nano experimental literature.

Authors:  Matthew Faria; Mattias Björnmalm; Kristofer J Thurecht; Stephen J Kent; Robert G Parton; Maria Kavallaris; Angus P R Johnston; J Justin Gooding; Simon R Corrie; Ben J Boyd; Pall Thordarson; Andrew K Whittaker; Molly M Stevens; Clive A Prestidge; Christopher J H Porter; Wolfgang J Parak; Thomas P Davis; Edmund J Crampin; Frank Caruso
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  The Adverse Outcome Pathway: A Multifaceted Framework Supporting 21st Century Toxicology.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Stephen W Edwards
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  Focused Microbiome Shifts in Reconstructed Wetlands Correlated with Elevated Copper Concentrations Originating from Micronized Copper Azole-Treated Wood.

Authors:  Jay R Reichman; Mark G Johnson; Paul T Rygiewicz; Bonnie M Smith; Michael A Bollman; Marjorie J Storm; George A King; Christian P Andersen
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.218

5.  Assessing the Environmental Effects Related to Quantum Dot Structure, Function, Synthesis and Exposure.

Authors:  Marissa Giroux; Zahra Zahra; Omobayo A Salawu; Robert M Burgess; Kay T Ho; Adeyemi S Adeleye
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2022-03-01

6.  Douglas-Fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) Transcriptome Profile Changes Induced by Diesel Emissions Generated with CeO2 Nanoparticle Fuel Borne Catalyst.

Authors:  Jay R Reichman; Paul T Rygiewicz; Mark G Johnson; Michael A Bollman; Bonnie M Smith; Q Todd Krantz; Charly J King; Kasey D Kovalcik; Christian P Andersen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Neurotoxicology of Nanomaterials.

Authors:  William K Boyes; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  Transformation and release of micronized Cu used as a wood preservative in treated wood in wetland soil.

Authors:  M G Johnson; T P Luxton; P T Rygiewicz; J R Reichman; M A Bollman; G A King; M J Storm; M S Nash; C P Andersen
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 9.988

Review 9.  Hazard Assessment of Polymeric Nanobiomaterials for Drug Delivery: What Can We Learn From Literature So Far.

Authors:  Sandra Jesus; Mélanie Schmutz; Claudia Som; Gerrit Borchard; Peter Wick; Olga Borges
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-23

10.  Impact of an Engineered Copper-Titanium Dioxide Nanocomposite and Parent Substrates on the Bacteria Viability, Antioxidant Enzymes and Fatty Acid Profiling.

Authors:  Oliwia Metryka; Daniel Wasilkowski; Anna Nowak; Małgorzata Adamczyk-Habrajska; Agnieszka Mrozik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.